The potential effects of the implementation of the carbon border adjustment mechanism - the case of Indonesia

IF 5.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Development Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101375
Iwan Hermawan , Carunia Mulya Firdausy , Erwidodo , Reninta Dewi Nugraheni , Fadhlan Zuhdi , Khoiru Rizqy Rambe , Delima Hasri Azahari , Dian Dwi Laksani , Ferry Samuel Jacob
{"title":"The potential effects of the implementation of the carbon border adjustment mechanism - the case of Indonesia","authors":"Iwan Hermawan ,&nbsp;Carunia Mulya Firdausy ,&nbsp;Erwidodo ,&nbsp;Reninta Dewi Nugraheni ,&nbsp;Fadhlan Zuhdi ,&nbsp;Khoiru Rizqy Rambe ,&nbsp;Delima Hasri Azahari ,&nbsp;Dian Dwi Laksani ,&nbsp;Ferry Samuel Jacob","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is one of the European Union's most ambitious climate-related trade initiatives, designed to reshape global industrial competitiveness well beyond Europe's borders. Despite its significance, empirical evidence on its economic impacts, particularly on partner countries such as Indonesia, remains limited. This study aims to address two objectives: first, to examine the potential effects of CBAM tariffs on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of EU trading partners; and second, to assess their implications for trade flows, sectoral adjustment, investment, and employment in Indonesia. Employing a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) framework with the Global Trade Analysis Project Recursive Dynamic (GTAP-RD) model, the analysis provides evidence-based insights into how CBAM may reverberate through the Indonesian economy. The results show that while aggregate effects on partner countries' GDP are negligible, sectoral and distributional consequences are much more pronounced. In Indonesia, carbon-intensive industries, particularly iron and steel, face considerable adjustment pressures through declining labor demand and structural reallocation, whereas other sectors remain relatively resilient. This suggests that CBAM functions less as a macroeconomic shock than as a catalyst, exposing the vulnerability of specific industries to low-carbon trade regimes. These findings enrich ongoing policy debates by demonstrating that modest aggregate outcomes can mask substantial sectoral disruptions. For the EU, the study clarifies CBAM's external ramifications, while for Indonesia, it underscores the urgency of adaptive strategies, from technological upgrading to labor market policies, to transform potential risks into opportunities for sustainable industrial development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101375"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525002416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is one of the European Union's most ambitious climate-related trade initiatives, designed to reshape global industrial competitiveness well beyond Europe's borders. Despite its significance, empirical evidence on its economic impacts, particularly on partner countries such as Indonesia, remains limited. This study aims to address two objectives: first, to examine the potential effects of CBAM tariffs on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of EU trading partners; and second, to assess their implications for trade flows, sectoral adjustment, investment, and employment in Indonesia. Employing a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) framework with the Global Trade Analysis Project Recursive Dynamic (GTAP-RD) model, the analysis provides evidence-based insights into how CBAM may reverberate through the Indonesian economy. The results show that while aggregate effects on partner countries' GDP are negligible, sectoral and distributional consequences are much more pronounced. In Indonesia, carbon-intensive industries, particularly iron and steel, face considerable adjustment pressures through declining labor demand and structural reallocation, whereas other sectors remain relatively resilient. This suggests that CBAM functions less as a macroeconomic shock than as a catalyst, exposing the vulnerability of specific industries to low-carbon trade regimes. These findings enrich ongoing policy debates by demonstrating that modest aggregate outcomes can mask substantial sectoral disruptions. For the EU, the study clarifies CBAM's external ramifications, while for Indonesia, it underscores the urgency of adaptive strategies, from technological upgrading to labor market policies, to transform potential risks into opportunities for sustainable industrial development.
碳边界调整机制实施的潜在影响——以印度尼西亚为例
碳边界调整机制(CBAM)是欧盟最雄心勃勃的气候相关贸易倡议之一,旨在重塑欧洲以外的全球工业竞争力。尽管其意义重大,但关于其经济影响的经验证据仍然有限,特别是对印度尼西亚等伙伴国的影响。本研究旨在解决两个目标:第一,检查CBAM关税对欧盟贸易伙伴国内生产总值(GDP)的潜在影响;第二,评估它们对印尼贸易流动、部门调整、投资和就业的影响。该分析采用可计算一般均衡(CGE)框架和全球贸易分析项目递归动态(GTAP-RD)模型,为CBAM如何影响印尼经济提供了基于证据的见解。结果表明,尽管对伙伴国GDP的总体影响可以忽略不计,但部门和分配后果要明显得多。在印尼,碳密集型产业,特别是钢铁行业,由于劳动力需求下降和结构再分配,面临着相当大的调整压力,而其他行业则保持相对弹性。这表明,CBAM的作用与其说是一种宏观经济冲击,不如说是一种催化剂,它暴露了特定行业对低碳贸易体制的脆弱性。这些研究结果表明,适度的总体结果可以掩盖重大的部门干扰,从而丰富了正在进行的政策辩论。对于欧盟来说,该研究阐明了CBAM的外部影响,而对于印度尼西亚来说,它强调了适应性战略的紧迫性,从技术升级到劳动力市场政策,将潜在风险转化为可持续工业发展的机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书