Share pledging by controlling shareholders and firm investment efficiency: Evidence from China

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Global Finance Journal Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101228
Yuanqi Zhou , Ya Zhang , Zhenghua Shuai , Yu-en Lin
{"title":"Share pledging by controlling shareholders and firm investment efficiency: Evidence from China","authors":"Yuanqi Zhou ,&nbsp;Ya Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhenghua Shuai ,&nbsp;Yu-en Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Share pledging is not strictly regulated in emerging markets, making it into a mechanism for controlling shareholders to cash out financing. Using data from Chinese listed companies (2008–2020), this study examines the relationship between controlling shareholder share pledging and corporate investment efficiency by incorporating the reinvestment behavior of pledged funds into an analytical framework. Results reveal a significant negative correlation between share pledging and investment efficiency by reducing information transparency, weakening corporate social responsibility(CSR), and damaging the effectiveness of internal control. However, pledged fund inflow can alleviate financing constraints and function as a reservoir to improve investment efficiency. When pledged funds flow into the enterprise, the <em>reservoir effect</em> becomes dominant, particularly in firms experiencing underinvestment issues. In this scenario, share pledges alleviate financing constraints, improve corporate investment efficiency. In contrast, when pledged funds flow out of the enterprise, weakened corporate governance from equity pledges triggers the tunneling effect, which exacerbates agency conflicts and reduces investment efficiency. Further analysis reveals that the <em>tunneling effect</em> is weaker for companies with high audit quality, strong media attention, and check-and-balance ownership. These findings, which remain robust after a series of tests including instrumental variable method(IV), propensity score matching(PSM), and alternative variable measurements, contribute to understanding share pledges' actual impact and mechanisms on firm-level resource allocation, yielding significant theoretical and practical insights for improving corporate governance and regulatory systems in emerging markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46907,"journal":{"name":"Global Finance Journal","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101228"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028325001553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Share pledging is not strictly regulated in emerging markets, making it into a mechanism for controlling shareholders to cash out financing. Using data from Chinese listed companies (2008–2020), this study examines the relationship between controlling shareholder share pledging and corporate investment efficiency by incorporating the reinvestment behavior of pledged funds into an analytical framework. Results reveal a significant negative correlation between share pledging and investment efficiency by reducing information transparency, weakening corporate social responsibility(CSR), and damaging the effectiveness of internal control. However, pledged fund inflow can alleviate financing constraints and function as a reservoir to improve investment efficiency. When pledged funds flow into the enterprise, the reservoir effect becomes dominant, particularly in firms experiencing underinvestment issues. In this scenario, share pledges alleviate financing constraints, improve corporate investment efficiency. In contrast, when pledged funds flow out of the enterprise, weakened corporate governance from equity pledges triggers the tunneling effect, which exacerbates agency conflicts and reduces investment efficiency. Further analysis reveals that the tunneling effect is weaker for companies with high audit quality, strong media attention, and check-and-balance ownership. These findings, which remain robust after a series of tests including instrumental variable method(IV), propensity score matching(PSM), and alternative variable measurements, contribute to understanding share pledges' actual impact and mechanisms on firm-level resource allocation, yielding significant theoretical and practical insights for improving corporate governance and regulatory systems in emerging markets.
控股股东股权质押与企业投资效率:来自中国的证据
在新兴市场,股权质押并未受到严格监管,这使其成为控股股东套现融资的一种机制。本文利用2008-2020年中国上市公司的数据,将质押资金的再投资行为纳入分析框架,考察了控股股东股权质押与公司投资效率之间的关系。结果表明,股权质押与投资效率之间存在显著的负相关关系,降低了信息透明度,削弱了企业社会责任,损害了内部控制的有效性。而质押资金流入可以缓解融资约束,起到蓄水池的作用,提高投资效率。当质押资金流入企业时,蓄水池效应就占主导地位,特别是在遇到投资不足问题的公司。在这种情况下,股权质押缓解了融资约束,提高了企业投资效率。而当质押资金流出企业时,股权质押导致的公司治理弱化引发了隧道效应,加剧了代理冲突,降低了投资效率。进一步分析发现,对于审计质量高、媒体关注度强、所有权制衡的公司,隧道效应较弱。这些发现在经过工具变量法(IV)、倾向得分匹配(PSM)和替代变量测量等一系列测试后仍然稳健,有助于理解股权质押对公司层面资源配置的实际影响和机制,为改善新兴市场的公司治理和监管体系提供重要的理论和实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Finance Journal
Global Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.50%
发文量
106
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Global Finance Journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and techniques among academicians and practitioners and, thereby, advances applied research in global financial management. Global Finance Journal publishes original, creative, scholarly research that integrates theory and practice and addresses a readership in both business and academia. Articles reflecting pragmatic research are sought in areas such as financial management, investment, banking and financial services, accounting, and taxation. Global Finance Journal welcomes contributions from scholars in both the business and academic community and encourages collaborative research from this broad base worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书