Bridging the Digital Divide in Diabetes Care: An Integrative Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Technology Use.

IF 2.2
Eric Peprah Osei, Sinead Campos, Pamela Martyn-Nemeth
{"title":"Bridging the Digital Divide in Diabetes Care: An Integrative Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Technology Use.","authors":"Eric Peprah Osei, Sinead Campos, Pamela Martyn-Nemeth","doi":"10.1177/26350106251397917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThe purpose of this integrative literature review was to assess barriers and facilitators to diabetes technology use among underrepresented racial and ethnic adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in the United States.MethodsThis integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's methodology. A systematic database search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception through December 2024. The inclusion criteria were English-language primary studies on diabetes technology targeting adolescents and young adults with T1DM from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups. Two independent reviewers identified articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed quality with the mixed-methods appraisal tool. The social ecological model guided thematic coding and deductive synthesis.ResultsOut of 1704 references, 8 articles met inclusion criteria. The most prevalent barriers to technology use were financial limitations, inadequate knowledge, limited patient-provider communication, insurance restrictions, lack of peer and family support, and cultural and psychosocial barriers. Facilitators included increased familiarity and support, positive experiences and involvement, effective communication, community-based education initiatives, and insurance and systemic advocacy.ConclusionThe review highlights persistent inequities in technology use among underrepresented racial-ethnic adolescents and young adults with T1DM. Actions should aim at preventing and reforming barriers, including racism and inequitable access, support for community-based interventions, and incentivize technological innovations for underrepresented individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":" ","pages":"88-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106251397917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this integrative literature review was to assess barriers and facilitators to diabetes technology use among underrepresented racial and ethnic adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in the United States.MethodsThis integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's methodology. A systematic database search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception through December 2024. The inclusion criteria were English-language primary studies on diabetes technology targeting adolescents and young adults with T1DM from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups. Two independent reviewers identified articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed quality with the mixed-methods appraisal tool. The social ecological model guided thematic coding and deductive synthesis.ResultsOut of 1704 references, 8 articles met inclusion criteria. The most prevalent barriers to technology use were financial limitations, inadequate knowledge, limited patient-provider communication, insurance restrictions, lack of peer and family support, and cultural and psychosocial barriers. Facilitators included increased familiarity and support, positive experiences and involvement, effective communication, community-based education initiatives, and insurance and systemic advocacy.ConclusionThe review highlights persistent inequities in technology use among underrepresented racial-ethnic adolescents and young adults with T1DM. Actions should aim at preventing and reforming barriers, including racism and inequitable access, support for community-based interventions, and incentivize technological innovations for underrepresented individuals.

弥合糖尿病护理中的数字鸿沟:技术使用障碍和促进因素的综合综述。
目的:本综合文献综述的目的是评估美国少数种族和民族青少年和年轻1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者使用糖尿病技术的障碍和促进因素。方法本综合综述采用Whittemore和Knafl的方法。系统检索了PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Scopus和Web of Science从成立到2024年12月的数据库。纳入标准是针对未被充分代表的种族和民族群体中患有T1DM的青少年和年轻人的糖尿病技术的英语初级研究。两名独立审稿人确定纳入的文章,提取数据,并使用混合方法评估工具评估质量。社会生态模式指导主题编码和演绎综合。结果1704篇文献中,8篇符合纳入标准。最普遍的技术使用障碍是资金限制、知识不足、患者与提供者沟通有限、保险限制、缺乏同伴和家庭支持以及文化和社会心理障碍。促进因素包括增加熟悉度和支持、积极的经验和参与、有效的沟通、基于社区的教育倡议、保险和系统的宣传。结论:该综述强调了在未被充分代表的种族-民族青少年和年轻的T1DM患者中持续存在的技术使用不平等。行动的目的应是防止和改革障碍,包括种族主义和不公平的机会,支持以社区为基础的干预措施,并鼓励为代表性不足的个人进行技术创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书