Eligibility criteria for the UK Winter Fuel Payment: are we targeting the right people?

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kai Wan, Jonathon Taylor, Marcos Quijal-Zamorano, Joan Ballester, Shakoor Hajat
{"title":"Eligibility criteria for the UK Winter Fuel Payment: are we targeting the right people?","authors":"Kai Wan, Jonathon Taylor, Marcos Quijal-Zamorano, Joan Ballester, Shakoor Hajat","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-224619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cold weather remains a serious health threat in the UK and elsewhere, particularly for older adults. The Winter Fuel Payment has been a key government strategy to mitigate health risks linked to cold homes in the UK, but recent policy shifts have raised questions about whether income-based eligibility criteria effectively identify those most at risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed cold-related mortality in adults aged ≥75 across 324 local authority districts in England (2007-2019) using distributed lag non-linear models in a spatial Bayesian framework. Multivariate meta-regression was used to evaluate modification of cold effects by deprivation, income-based pension credit uptake, home energy efficiency and fuel poverty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Areas in the highest quartile of fuel poverty had significantly greater cold-related mortality risk than those in the lowest quartile, with a 15.3% versus 13.1% increase in mortality risk at the first compared with the 50th percentile of wintertime temperature, ie, an absolute difference of 2.2% (p<0.001). This effect was stronger than the corresponding differences for energy efficiency (1.7%, p=0.04), income as indicated by pension credit uptake (0.6%, p=0.39) and deprivation-based measures, for which differences were minimal. Overall, an estimated 17% of cold-related deaths among people aged ≥75 were attributable to fuel poverty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fuel poverty, an indicator designed to capture both low-income and housing energy efficiency, is a stronger predictor of cold-related mortality than income (as indicated by pension credit update) or deprivation-based indicators alone. Winter energy support schemes should consider fuel poverty metrics in their targeting to more effectively reduce health risks associated with cold homes and improve equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"432-435"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-224619","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cold weather remains a serious health threat in the UK and elsewhere, particularly for older adults. The Winter Fuel Payment has been a key government strategy to mitigate health risks linked to cold homes in the UK, but recent policy shifts have raised questions about whether income-based eligibility criteria effectively identify those most at risk.

Methods: We analysed cold-related mortality in adults aged ≥75 across 324 local authority districts in England (2007-2019) using distributed lag non-linear models in a spatial Bayesian framework. Multivariate meta-regression was used to evaluate modification of cold effects by deprivation, income-based pension credit uptake, home energy efficiency and fuel poverty.

Results: Areas in the highest quartile of fuel poverty had significantly greater cold-related mortality risk than those in the lowest quartile, with a 15.3% versus 13.1% increase in mortality risk at the first compared with the 50th percentile of wintertime temperature, ie, an absolute difference of 2.2% (p<0.001). This effect was stronger than the corresponding differences for energy efficiency (1.7%, p=0.04), income as indicated by pension credit uptake (0.6%, p=0.39) and deprivation-based measures, for which differences were minimal. Overall, an estimated 17% of cold-related deaths among people aged ≥75 were attributable to fuel poverty.

Conclusion: Fuel poverty, an indicator designed to capture both low-income and housing energy efficiency, is a stronger predictor of cold-related mortality than income (as indicated by pension credit update) or deprivation-based indicators alone. Winter energy support schemes should consider fuel poverty metrics in their targeting to more effectively reduce health risks associated with cold homes and improve equity.

英国冬季燃料补贴的资格标准:我们的目标人群是否合适?
背景:在英国和其他地方,寒冷天气仍然是一个严重的健康威胁,尤其是对老年人。在英国,冬季燃料补贴一直是政府减轻与寒冷房屋相关的健康风险的一项关键战略,但最近的政策转变引发了人们的质疑,即基于收入的资格标准是否能有效地识别出风险最大的人群。方法:我们使用空间贝叶斯框架中的分布式滞后非线性模型分析了2007-2019年英国324个地方政府辖区≥75岁成年人的感冒相关死亡率。使用多元元回归来评估贫困、基于收入的养老金信贷吸收、家庭能源效率和燃料贫困对冷效应的修正。结果:燃料贫困最高四分位数的地区与寒冷相关的死亡风险明显高于最低四分位数的地区,与冬季温度的第50百分位数相比,第一次死亡风险增加了15.3%,13.1%,即绝对差异为2.2% (p)。燃料贫困是一个旨在反映低收入和住房能源效率的指标,它比收入(如养老金信贷更新所示)或仅以贫困为基础的指标更能预测与寒冷有关的死亡率。冬季能源支持计划应在确定目标时考虑燃料贫穷指标,以便更有效地减少与寒冷房屋有关的健康风险,并改善公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health is a leading international journal devoted to publication of original research and reviews covering applied, methodological and theoretical issues with emphasis on studies using multidisciplinary or integrative approaches. The journal aims to improve epidemiological knowledge and ultimately health worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书