Autonomous fall risk assessment in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities using passive sensors: A feasibility study

IF 4.3
Experimental gerontology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-22 DOI:10.1016/j.exger.2025.113013
David Silvera-Tawil , Jane Li , Liesel Higgins , Deepa Prabhu , Jennifer Hewitt , Katie Packer , Wei Lu , Maggie Haertsch , Marlien Varnfield
{"title":"Autonomous fall risk assessment in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities using passive sensors: A feasibility study","authors":"David Silvera-Tawil ,&nbsp;Jane Li ,&nbsp;Liesel Higgins ,&nbsp;Deepa Prabhu ,&nbsp;Jennifer Hewitt ,&nbsp;Katie Packer ,&nbsp;Wei Lu ,&nbsp;Maggie Haertsch ,&nbsp;Marlien Varnfield","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2025.113013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Falls in residential aged care home (RAC) remain a critical issue in Australia, contributing to diminished quality of life and increased morbidity among older adults. This study investigates the feasibility of passive sensor technologies to proactively identify behavioural changes, such as reduced mobility and sleep disturbances, that may signal elevated fall risk. It also explores resident and staff acceptance of the technology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An open-label, non-randomized feasibility trial using a single-group, post-test mixed methods design was conducted with 24 residents at a RAC in Sydney, Australia. Ambient and wearable sensor data and clinical records were collected, alongside interviews with residents and staff. Data were analysed using quantitative and qualitative techniques to assess feasibility and user experience.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sensor data revealed diverse resident routines and rapid staff responses to alerts. Predictive analytics showed promise for identifying elevated fall risk, though further validation is needed. Qualitative feedback from 10 residents indicated residents found the system mostly unobtrusive but raised concerns around privacy and false alerts that triggered staff interventions. Despite this, many residents acknowledged its value, especially for individuals with higher vulnerability. Interviews with eight staff members echoed the system's potential to enhance monitoring and safety, but noted technical and training challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study demonstrates that sensor-based monitoring in RACs is technically feasible and generally acceptable. The findings support its integration into aged care as a proactive, person-centred approach to falls management, provided that implementation is supported by thoughtful design, clear communication, and staff training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 113013"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556525003420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Falls in residential aged care home (RAC) remain a critical issue in Australia, contributing to diminished quality of life and increased morbidity among older adults. This study investigates the feasibility of passive sensor technologies to proactively identify behavioural changes, such as reduced mobility and sleep disturbances, that may signal elevated fall risk. It also explores resident and staff acceptance of the technology.

Methods

An open-label, non-randomized feasibility trial using a single-group, post-test mixed methods design was conducted with 24 residents at a RAC in Sydney, Australia. Ambient and wearable sensor data and clinical records were collected, alongside interviews with residents and staff. Data were analysed using quantitative and qualitative techniques to assess feasibility and user experience.

Results

Sensor data revealed diverse resident routines and rapid staff responses to alerts. Predictive analytics showed promise for identifying elevated fall risk, though further validation is needed. Qualitative feedback from 10 residents indicated residents found the system mostly unobtrusive but raised concerns around privacy and false alerts that triggered staff interventions. Despite this, many residents acknowledged its value, especially for individuals with higher vulnerability. Interviews with eight staff members echoed the system's potential to enhance monitoring and safety, but noted technical and training challenges.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates that sensor-based monitoring in RACs is technically feasible and generally acceptable. The findings support its integration into aged care as a proactive, person-centred approach to falls management, provided that implementation is supported by thoughtful design, clear communication, and staff training.
澳大利亚住宅养老设施中使用被动传感器的自主跌倒风险评估:可行性研究。
背景:在澳大利亚,养老院(RAC)跌倒仍然是一个关键问题,导致老年人生活质量下降和发病率增加。这项研究调查了被动传感器技术的可行性,以主动识别行为变化,如活动能力下降和睡眠障碍,这可能预示着跌倒风险的增加。它还探讨了居民和工作人员对这项技术的接受程度。方法:对澳大利亚悉尼某RAC的24名居民进行了一项开放标签、非随机可行性试验,采用单组、试验后混合方法设计。收集环境和可穿戴传感器数据和临床记录,以及与居民和工作人员的访谈。使用定量和定性技术分析数据,以评估可行性和用户体验。结果:传感器数据揭示了不同的居民惯例和快速的工作人员对警报的反应。预测分析显示,尽管需要进一步验证,但仍有望识别出较高的跌倒风险。来自10位居民的定性反馈表明,居民们认为该系统大多不引人注目,但引发了对隐私和错误警报的担忧,引发了工作人员的干预。尽管如此,许多居民还是承认它的价值,尤其是对那些易受伤害的人。对8名工作人员的采访反映了该系统在加强监测和安全方面的潜力,但也指出了技术和培训方面的挑战。结论:本研究表明,基于传感器的rac监测在技术上是可行的,并且被普遍接受。研究结果支持将其作为一种主动的、以人为本的跌倒管理方法纳入老年护理,前提是实施过程中要有周到的设计、清晰的沟通和人员培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书