Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Bibliometric Review and Clinical Implications.

IF 5.7 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiac Failure Review Pub Date : 2025-12-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.15420/cfr.2025.27
Tianzong Li, Yiran Luo, Lina Zhao, Fangfang Lu, Bei Zhang
{"title":"Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Bibliometric Review and Clinical Implications.","authors":"Tianzong Li, Yiran Luo, Lina Zhao, Fangfang Lu, Bei Zhang","doi":"10.15420/cfr.2025.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure remains a growing global health burden, and early disruptions in ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) contribute to its pathogenesis, particularly in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We conducted an integrative bibliometric and thematic review of Web of Science records (search on 1 March 2025; coverage through December 2024) to map how VAC has evolved from a mechanistic construct to a clinically actionable framework in HFpEF. Output accelerated since 2006, with four core clusters spanning haemodynamics, right ventricle- pulmonary artery coupling, arterial stiffness, and clinical imaging. VAC has steadily moved physiological constructs toward clinical risk stratification, especially in HFpEF and right ventricular dysfunction. Important gaps include non-standardised assessment and limited prospective validation of VAC-targeted interventions. This review synthesises mechanistic and clinical evidence across the left atrial, left ventricular, and right ventricle-pulmonary artery axes and, on that basis, sets practical priorities for measurement standardisation and prospective validation within a whole-heart perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":33741,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac Failure Review","volume":"11 ","pages":"e32"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12723819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac Failure Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2025.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart failure remains a growing global health burden, and early disruptions in ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) contribute to its pathogenesis, particularly in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We conducted an integrative bibliometric and thematic review of Web of Science records (search on 1 March 2025; coverage through December 2024) to map how VAC has evolved from a mechanistic construct to a clinically actionable framework in HFpEF. Output accelerated since 2006, with four core clusters spanning haemodynamics, right ventricle- pulmonary artery coupling, arterial stiffness, and clinical imaging. VAC has steadily moved physiological constructs toward clinical risk stratification, especially in HFpEF and right ventricular dysfunction. Important gaps include non-standardised assessment and limited prospective validation of VAC-targeted interventions. This review synthesises mechanistic and clinical evidence across the left atrial, left ventricular, and right ventricle-pulmonary artery axes and, on that basis, sets practical priorities for measurement standardisation and prospective validation within a whole-heart perspective.

保留射血分数的心力衰竭的心室-动脉耦合:文献计量学回顾和临床意义。
心力衰竭仍然是一个日益严重的全球健康负担,心室-动脉耦合(VAC)的早期中断有助于其发病机制,特别是在保留射血分数(HFpEF)的心力衰竭中。我们对Web of Science记录(检索时间为2025年3月1日,覆盖时间为2024年12月)进行了综合文献计量学和专题综述,以描绘VAC如何从HFpEF的机械结构演变为临床可操作的框架。自2006年以来,输出加速,四个核心集群跨越血流动力学,右心室-肺动脉耦合,动脉硬度和临床影像学。VAC已逐步将生理结构推向临床风险分层,特别是HFpEF和右室功能障碍。重要的空白包括针对vaca的干预措施的非标准化评估和有限的前瞻性验证。本综述综合了左心房、左心室和右心室-肺动脉轴的机制和临床证据,并在此基础上,为全心脏视角下的测量标准化和前瞻性验证设定了实际优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书