Comparison of bending and tension tests for orthodontic wires

Mohammad Kazem Asgharnia D.M.D., M.S., M.S. , William A. Brantley Ph.D
{"title":"Comparison of bending and tension tests for orthodontic wires","authors":"Mohammad Kazem Asgharnia D.M.D., M.S., M.S. ,&nbsp;William A. Brantley Ph.D","doi":"10.1016/0002-9416(86)90037-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stainless steel, cobalt-chromium-nickel (Elgiloy), nitinol, and beta titanium wires with diameters from 0.010 to 0.040 inch and in rectangular sizes from 0.017 × 0.025 to 0.019 × 0.025 inch were evaluated with the American Dental Association specification no. 32 bending test and the conventional tension test. The modulus of elasticity (E) and yield strength (YS) obtained with the two mechanical testing procedures are reported for as-received wires and after heat treatment at 900° F for the stainless steel and selected Elgiloy wires. Measured values of E and YS in bending were almost invariably higher than the corresponding values obtained in tension. The only general agreement between the modulus of elasticity in bending and tension was for the 0.040-inch diameter stainless steel wires. Anomalously high values of E in bending were also found for most of the heat-treated stainless steel and Elgiloy groups. Difficulties with the bending test are attributed to loading effects at both ends of the test span and deviation of the bent specimen from a circular arc. Improved procedures are described for performing the tension test on the relatively small cross-section orthodontic wires.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75476,"journal":{"name":"American journal of orthodontics","volume":"89 3","pages":"Pages 228-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0002-9416(86)90037-0","citationCount":"83","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0002941686900370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

Abstract

Stainless steel, cobalt-chromium-nickel (Elgiloy), nitinol, and beta titanium wires with diameters from 0.010 to 0.040 inch and in rectangular sizes from 0.017 × 0.025 to 0.019 × 0.025 inch were evaluated with the American Dental Association specification no. 32 bending test and the conventional tension test. The modulus of elasticity (E) and yield strength (YS) obtained with the two mechanical testing procedures are reported for as-received wires and after heat treatment at 900° F for the stainless steel and selected Elgiloy wires. Measured values of E and YS in bending were almost invariably higher than the corresponding values obtained in tension. The only general agreement between the modulus of elasticity in bending and tension was for the 0.040-inch diameter stainless steel wires. Anomalously high values of E in bending were also found for most of the heat-treated stainless steel and Elgiloy groups. Difficulties with the bending test are attributed to loading effects at both ends of the test span and deviation of the bent specimen from a circular arc. Improved procedures are described for performing the tension test on the relatively small cross-section orthodontic wires.

正畸金属丝弯曲与拉力试验的比较
直径为0.010至0.040英寸,矩形尺寸为0.017 × 0.025至0.019 × 0.025英寸的不锈钢、钴铬镍(Elgiloy)、镍钛诺和β钛丝按照美国牙科协会规范编号进行评估。32 .弯曲试验和常规拉力试验。弹性模量(E)和屈服强度(YS)通过两种机械测试程序获得,报告了接收钢丝和900°F热处理后的不锈钢和选定的Elgiloy钢丝。弯曲时的E和YS的测量值几乎总是高于拉伸时的相应值。弯曲弹性模量和拉伸弹性模量之间唯一一致的是直径为0.040英寸的不锈钢丝。在大多数热处理不锈钢和Elgiloy组中也发现了异常高的弯曲E值。弯曲试验的困难是由于试验跨度两端的载荷效应和弯曲试样与圆弧的偏差。本文描述了在相对小的横截面正畸金属丝上进行张力测试的改进程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信