[Cognitive-Behavioral therapy for patients with disability associated with chronic pain: systematic review of clinical trials]

Q3 Medicine
Lilian Granizo Lara, Vanessa Carvajal Granizo, Ángel Reyes Izurieta
{"title":"[Cognitive-Behavioral therapy for patients with disability associated with chronic pain: systematic review of clinical trials]","authors":"Lilian Granizo Lara, Vanessa Carvajal Granizo, Ángel Reyes Izurieta","doi":"10.31053/1853.0605.v82.n4.48710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically assess the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) in reducing disability associated with chronic pain, identifying the most effective therapeutic approaches, key components of the interventions, and clinical conditions that exhibit the greatest improvements</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The systematic review followed the PRISMA methodology. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect to identify clinical trials evaluating disability associated with chronic pain in patients treated with CBT, published between January 2019 and January 2024, in English or Spanish. Due to data heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible, and a narrative synthesis was employed to present the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were analyzed, incorporating various CBT modalities (in-person, digital, and combined with other therapies). 84% of the interventions demonstrated significant improvements in disability related to chronic pain. The most effective modalities included in-person CBT, digital CBT, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). The key components identified were psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, graded activity, relaxation techniques, emotional regulation, an interdisciplinary approach, and the use of technology. Conditions showing the greatest improvements included chronic low back pain, generalized chronic pain, migraine with comorbid depression, and chronic pain in patients with prolonged opioid use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBT is effective in reducing disability in patients with chronic pain, with greater benefits observed when combined with other strategies. Its implementation in primary care settings could enhance initial pain management and prevent the chronicity of disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":38814,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas de Cordoba","volume":"82 4","pages":"882-901"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12863394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas de Cordoba","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v82.n4.48710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically assess the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) in reducing disability associated with chronic pain, identifying the most effective therapeutic approaches, key components of the interventions, and clinical conditions that exhibit the greatest improvements

Materials and methods: The systematic review followed the PRISMA methodology. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect to identify clinical trials evaluating disability associated with chronic pain in patients treated with CBT, published between January 2019 and January 2024, in English or Spanish. Due to data heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible, and a narrative synthesis was employed to present the results.

Results: Nineteen studies were analyzed, incorporating various CBT modalities (in-person, digital, and combined with other therapies). 84% of the interventions demonstrated significant improvements in disability related to chronic pain. The most effective modalities included in-person CBT, digital CBT, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). The key components identified were psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, graded activity, relaxation techniques, emotional regulation, an interdisciplinary approach, and the use of technology. Conditions showing the greatest improvements included chronic low back pain, generalized chronic pain, migraine with comorbid depression, and chronic pain in patients with prolonged opioid use.

Conclusion: CBT is effective in reducing disability in patients with chronic pain, with greater benefits observed when combined with other strategies. Its implementation in primary care settings could enhance initial pain management and prevent the chronicity of disability.

Abstract Image

[认知行为疗法治疗慢性疼痛相关残疾患者:临床试验的系统回顾]
目的:系统评估认知行为疗法(CBT)在减少慢性疼痛相关残疾方面的有效性,确定最有效的治疗方法、干预措施的关键组成部分以及表现出最大改善的临床条件。材料和方法:系统评价采用PRISMA方法。在PubMed、Embase和ScienceDirect中进行了检索,以确定在2019年1月至2024年1月期间以英语或西班牙语发表的评估CBT治疗患者与慢性疼痛相关的残疾的临床试验。由于数据的异质性,meta分析是不可行的,并采用叙事综合来呈现结果。结果:我们分析了19项研究,纳入了各种CBT模式(面对面、数字化和联合其他疗法)。84%的干预措施显示与慢性疼痛相关的残疾有显著改善。最有效的方式包括面对面的CBT、数字CBT和接受与承诺治疗(ACT)。确定的关键组成部分是心理教育,认知重组,分级活动,放松技巧,情绪调节,跨学科方法和技术的使用。表现出最大改善的情况包括慢性腰痛、全身性慢性疼痛、伴有抑郁症的偏头痛以及长期使用阿片类药物患者的慢性疼痛。结论:CBT可有效减少慢性疼痛患者的残疾,与其他策略联合使用效果更佳。它在初级保健机构的实施可以加强最初的疼痛管理和预防残疾的慢性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Faculty of Medical Sciences is a scientific publication of the Secretariat of Science and Technology of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the National University of Cordoba. Its objective is to disseminate and promote research work related to Medical and Biological Sciences. It publishes scientific works of national and international professionals on different topics related to health sciences from the field of medicine, nursing, kinesiology, diagnostic imaging, phonoaudiology, nutrition, public health, chemical sciences, dentistry and related.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书