Chemokines and Motor Symptoms in First-Episode Psychosis: Are We Overlooking One of the Puzzle Pieces in Understanding the Neurological Immune Mechanisms behind Them?

IF 3.7 4区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychobiology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-22 DOI:10.1159/000549183
Alejandro Ballesteros, Maria Flores-Lopez, Ana Sánchez-Torres, Antonia Serrano, Eloi Giné-Servén, Ana L Gavito, Fernándo Rodríguez de Fonseca, Manuel J Cuesta
{"title":"Chemokines and Motor Symptoms in First-Episode Psychosis: Are We Overlooking One of the Puzzle Pieces in Understanding the Neurological Immune Mechanisms behind Them?","authors":"Alejandro Ballesteros, Maria Flores-Lopez, Ana Sánchez-Torres, Antonia Serrano, Eloi Giné-Servén, Ana L Gavito, Fernándo Rodríguez de Fonseca, Manuel J Cuesta","doi":"10.1159/000549183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of chemokines in motor abnormalities (MAs) in first-episode psychosis (FEP) is underexplored. Investigating immune biomarker levels in FEP, their association with MAs, and their differences with individuals without FEP may reveal therapeutic targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight patients and thirty-four controls were included. Primary outcomes assessed group differences in chemokines related immune whole blood biomarkers, including innate (CCL2, CCL3, and CCL11), compensatory (PPARα, CXCL1, and CB2), natural immune chemotaxis biomarkers (CXCL2 and CXCR4), and growth factors (LPAR2, brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]). Our secondary aim was to examine their association with the total score of five motor scales: the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES), Simpson Angus Scale (SAS), catatonia symptom of the Comprehensive Assessment of Symptoms and History (CASH), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found significantly higher levels of protein markers (CCL2, VEGF, and CXCL12) and mRNA expression (CXCR4, PPARα, CB2, and LPAR2) in FEP patients compared to the control group. We only observed positive and significant results for CCL2-UPDRS total and CXCR4-SAS associations in post hoc multivariate analyses (β = 0.401, p = 0.036 and β = 0.58, p = 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated levels of potential neurotoxic (CCL2) and neuroprotective (PPARα and CB2) biomarkers were seen in FEP patients when compared to controls. Moreover, CCL2 levels seem to be directly associated with Parkinsonism in FEP patients, while CXCR4 may be protective against extrapyramidal symptoms. Further research should clarify immune differences between FEP and non-FEP groups, especially in chemotaxis and endocannabinoid pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":19239,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychobiology","volume":" ","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The role of chemokines in motor abnormalities (MAs) in first-episode psychosis (FEP) is underexplored. Investigating immune biomarker levels in FEP, their association with MAs, and their differences with individuals without FEP may reveal therapeutic targets.

Methods: Thirty-eight patients and thirty-four controls were included. Primary outcomes assessed group differences in chemokines related immune whole blood biomarkers, including innate (CCL2, CCL3, and CCL11), compensatory (PPARα, CXCL1, and CB2), natural immune chemotaxis biomarkers (CXCL2 and CXCR4), and growth factors (LPAR2, brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]). Our secondary aim was to examine their association with the total score of five motor scales: the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES), Simpson Angus Scale (SAS), catatonia symptom of the Comprehensive Assessment of Symptoms and History (CASH), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS).

Results: We found significantly higher levels of protein markers (CCL2, VEGF, and CXCL12) and mRNA expression (CXCR4, PPARα, CB2, and LPAR2) in FEP patients compared to the control group. We only observed positive and significant results for CCL2-UPDRS total and CXCR4-SAS associations in post hoc multivariate analyses (β = 0.401, p = 0.036 and β = 0.58, p = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions: Elevated levels of potential neurotoxic (CCL2) and neuroprotective (PPARα and CB2) biomarkers were seen in FEP patients when compared to controls. Moreover, CCL2 levels seem to be directly associated with Parkinsonism in FEP patients, while CXCR4 may be protective against extrapyramidal symptoms. Further research should clarify immune differences between FEP and non-FEP groups, especially in chemotaxis and endocannabinoid pathways.

趋化因子和首发精神病的运动症状:我们是否忽视了理解它们背后的神经免疫机制的一个难题?
背景:趋化因子在首发精神病(FEP)患者运动异常(MAs)中的作用尚不清楚。研究FEP中的免疫生物标志物水平、它们与MAs的关联,以及它们与非FEP个体的差异,可能会揭示治疗靶点。方法:纳入38例患者和34例对照组。主要结果评估了各组趋化因子相关免疫全血生物标志物的差异,包括先天(CCL2、CCL3和CCL11)、代偿(PPARα、CXCL1和CB2)、天然免疫趋化生物标志物(CXCL2和CXCR4)和生长因子(LPAR2、BDNF和VEGF)。我们的第二个目的是检查它们与五个运动量表的总分的关系:神经学评估量表(NES)、辛普森安格斯量表(SAS)、症状和病史综合评估的紧张症症状(CASH)、巴恩斯运动障碍评定量表和统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)。结果:我们发现FEP患者的蛋白质标志物(CCL2、VEGF和CXCL12)和mRNA表达(CXCR4、PPARα、CB2和LPAR2)水平明显高于对照组。在事后多变量分析中,我们只观察到CCL2-UDPRS总量和CXCR4-SAS的阳性和显著结果(β = 0.401, p = 0.036和β = 0.58, p = 0.001)。结论:与对照组相比,FEP患者的潜在神经毒性(CCL2)或神经保护性(PPARα和CB2)生物标志物水平升高。此外,CCL2水平似乎与FEP患者的帕金森病直接相关,而CXR4可能对锥体外系症状有保护作用。进一步的研究应该阐明FEP组和非FEP组之间的免疫差异,特别是在趋化性和内源性大麻素途径上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychobiology
Neuropsychobiology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The biological approach to mental disorders continues to yield innovative findings of clinical importance, particularly if methodologies are combined. This journal collects high quality empirical studies from various experimental and clinical approaches in the fields of Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology. It features original, clinical and basic research in the fields of neurophysiology and functional imaging, neuropharmacology and neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and neuroimmunology, genetics and their relationships with normal psychology and psychopathology. In addition, the reader will find studies on animal models of mental disorders and therapeutic interventions, and pharmacoelectroencephalographic studies. Regular reviews report new methodologic approaches, and selected case reports provide hints for future research. ''Neuropsychobiology'' is a complete record of strategies and methodologies employed to study the biological basis of mental functions including their interactions with psychological and social factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书