Chemokines and Motor Symptoms in First-Episode Psychosis: Are We Overlooking One of the Puzzle Pieces in Understanding the Neurological Immune Mechanisms behind Them?
Alejandro Ballesteros, Maria Flores-Lopez, Ana Sánchez-Torres, Antonia Serrano, Eloi Giné-Servén, Ana L Gavito, Fernándo Rodríguez de Fonseca, Manuel J Cuesta
{"title":"Chemokines and Motor Symptoms in First-Episode Psychosis: Are We Overlooking One of the Puzzle Pieces in Understanding the Neurological Immune Mechanisms behind Them?","authors":"Alejandro Ballesteros, Maria Flores-Lopez, Ana Sánchez-Torres, Antonia Serrano, Eloi Giné-Servén, Ana L Gavito, Fernándo Rodríguez de Fonseca, Manuel J Cuesta","doi":"10.1159/000549183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of chemokines in motor abnormalities (MAs) in first-episode psychosis (FEP) is underexplored. Investigating immune biomarker levels in FEP, their association with MAs, and their differences with individuals without FEP may reveal therapeutic targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight patients and thirty-four controls were included. Primary outcomes assessed group differences in chemokines related immune whole blood biomarkers, including innate (CCL2, CCL3, and CCL11), compensatory (PPARα, CXCL1, and CB2), natural immune chemotaxis biomarkers (CXCL2 and CXCR4), and growth factors (LPAR2, brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]). Our secondary aim was to examine their association with the total score of five motor scales: the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES), Simpson Angus Scale (SAS), catatonia symptom of the Comprehensive Assessment of Symptoms and History (CASH), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found significantly higher levels of protein markers (CCL2, VEGF, and CXCL12) and mRNA expression (CXCR4, PPARα, CB2, and LPAR2) in FEP patients compared to the control group. We only observed positive and significant results for CCL2-UPDRS total and CXCR4-SAS associations in post hoc multivariate analyses (β = 0.401, p = 0.036 and β = 0.58, p = 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated levels of potential neurotoxic (CCL2) and neuroprotective (PPARα and CB2) biomarkers were seen in FEP patients when compared to controls. Moreover, CCL2 levels seem to be directly associated with Parkinsonism in FEP patients, while CXCR4 may be protective against extrapyramidal symptoms. Further research should clarify immune differences between FEP and non-FEP groups, especially in chemotaxis and endocannabinoid pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":19239,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychobiology","volume":" ","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The role of chemokines in motor abnormalities (MAs) in first-episode psychosis (FEP) is underexplored. Investigating immune biomarker levels in FEP, their association with MAs, and their differences with individuals without FEP may reveal therapeutic targets.
Methods: Thirty-eight patients and thirty-four controls were included. Primary outcomes assessed group differences in chemokines related immune whole blood biomarkers, including innate (CCL2, CCL3, and CCL11), compensatory (PPARα, CXCL1, and CB2), natural immune chemotaxis biomarkers (CXCL2 and CXCR4), and growth factors (LPAR2, brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]). Our secondary aim was to examine their association with the total score of five motor scales: the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES), Simpson Angus Scale (SAS), catatonia symptom of the Comprehensive Assessment of Symptoms and History (CASH), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS).
Results: We found significantly higher levels of protein markers (CCL2, VEGF, and CXCL12) and mRNA expression (CXCR4, PPARα, CB2, and LPAR2) in FEP patients compared to the control group. We only observed positive and significant results for CCL2-UPDRS total and CXCR4-SAS associations in post hoc multivariate analyses (β = 0.401, p = 0.036 and β = 0.58, p = 0.001, respectively).
Conclusions: Elevated levels of potential neurotoxic (CCL2) and neuroprotective (PPARα and CB2) biomarkers were seen in FEP patients when compared to controls. Moreover, CCL2 levels seem to be directly associated with Parkinsonism in FEP patients, while CXCR4 may be protective against extrapyramidal symptoms. Further research should clarify immune differences between FEP and non-FEP groups, especially in chemotaxis and endocannabinoid pathways.
期刊介绍:
The biological approach to mental disorders continues to yield innovative findings of clinical importance, particularly if methodologies are combined. This journal collects high quality empirical studies from various experimental and clinical approaches in the fields of Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology. It features original, clinical and basic research in the fields of neurophysiology and functional imaging, neuropharmacology and neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and neuroimmunology, genetics and their relationships with normal psychology and psychopathology. In addition, the reader will find studies on animal models of mental disorders and therapeutic interventions, and pharmacoelectroencephalographic studies. Regular reviews report new methodologic approaches, and selected case reports provide hints for future research. ''Neuropsychobiology'' is a complete record of strategies and methodologies employed to study the biological basis of mental functions including their interactions with psychological and social factors.