Soft-tissue and half-value windows outperform bone window in ureteral stone size measurements in non-enhanced computed tomography.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-23 DOI:10.1177/02841851251406451
Klara Sahlén, Anders Magnusson, Ulf Nyman, Marcin Popiolek, Lisa Wernroth, Mats Lidén, Johan Jendeberg
{"title":"Soft-tissue and half-value windows outperform bone window in ureteral stone size measurements in non-enhanced computed tomography.","authors":"Klara Sahlén, Anders Magnusson, Ulf Nyman, Marcin Popiolek, Lisa Wernroth, Mats Lidén, Johan Jendeberg","doi":"10.1177/02841851251406451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundInterreader variability in ureteral stone size measurements affect the predicted probability of spontaneous stone passage (SSP), especially in proximal ureteral stones. Window settings have been shown to influence interreader variability.PurposeTo investigate interreader variability of ureteral stone size measurements in four different window settings.Material and MethodsPatients with a unilateral proximal ureteral stone ≥2.0 mm detected during emergency computed tomography (CT) were included in this single-center study. Five observers measured each stone in three dimensions in a soft-tissue window, bone window, and two half-value windows (based on the mean [half-value MEAN] or maximum attenuation of the stone [half-value MAX]). Limits of agreement of the mean (LOAM) for stone size in each window setting were assessed. Logistic regression curves were created for predicted probability of SSP.ResultsIn total, 124 patients (87 men, 37 women; mean age = 52 years; age range = 22-82 years) were retrospectively evaluated. LOAM: bone window (±1.6 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.24-4.90), soft-tissue window (±0.4 mm, 95% CI=0.37-0.82), half-value MEAN window (±0.3 mm, 95% CI=0.24-0.40), half-value MAX window (±0.2 mm, 95% CI=0.14-0.30). Prediction curves aligned and shifted to the left as mean stone size decreased in the half-value window settings.ConclusionThe bone window is unsatisfactory for ureteral stone size measurements. The interreader variability in soft-tissue and half-value windows is on a sub-mm magnitude, with no expected impact on clinical decision-making. The half-value MAX window had the smallest interreader variability and should be considered for reproducible and semiautomated ureteral stone size measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"255-263"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12963466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251406451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundInterreader variability in ureteral stone size measurements affect the predicted probability of spontaneous stone passage (SSP), especially in proximal ureteral stones. Window settings have been shown to influence interreader variability.PurposeTo investigate interreader variability of ureteral stone size measurements in four different window settings.Material and MethodsPatients with a unilateral proximal ureteral stone ≥2.0 mm detected during emergency computed tomography (CT) were included in this single-center study. Five observers measured each stone in three dimensions in a soft-tissue window, bone window, and two half-value windows (based on the mean [half-value MEAN] or maximum attenuation of the stone [half-value MAX]). Limits of agreement of the mean (LOAM) for stone size in each window setting were assessed. Logistic regression curves were created for predicted probability of SSP.ResultsIn total, 124 patients (87 men, 37 women; mean age = 52 years; age range = 22-82 years) were retrospectively evaluated. LOAM: bone window (±1.6 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.24-4.90), soft-tissue window (±0.4 mm, 95% CI=0.37-0.82), half-value MEAN window (±0.3 mm, 95% CI=0.24-0.40), half-value MAX window (±0.2 mm, 95% CI=0.14-0.30). Prediction curves aligned and shifted to the left as mean stone size decreased in the half-value window settings.ConclusionThe bone window is unsatisfactory for ureteral stone size measurements. The interreader variability in soft-tissue and half-value windows is on a sub-mm magnitude, with no expected impact on clinical decision-making. The half-value MAX window had the smallest interreader variability and should be considered for reproducible and semiautomated ureteral stone size measurements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在非增强计算机断层扫描中,输尿管结石大小测量的软组织窗和半值窗优于骨窗。
背景:输尿管结石尺寸测量的解读差异影响自发性结石通过(SSP)的预测概率,尤其是输尿管近端结石。窗口设置已被证明会影响解读器的可变性。目的探讨输尿管结石尺寸测量在四种不同窗口设置下的解读变异性。材料与方法在急诊CT检查中发现单侧输尿管近端结石≥2.0 mm的患者纳入本单中心研究。五名观察员在软组织窗口、骨窗口和两个半值窗口(基于平均值[半值均值]或结石的最大衰减[半值MAX])中三维测量每个结石。评估了每个窗口设置中石材尺寸的平均一致性极限(LOAM)。对SSP的预测概率建立Logistic回归曲线。结果回顾性分析124例患者,其中男性87例,女性37例,平均年龄52岁,年龄范围22 ~ 82岁。LOAM:骨窗(±1.6 mm, 95%可信区间[CI]=1.24-4.90),软组织窗(±0.4 mm, 95% CI=0.37-0.82),半值MEAN窗(±0.3 mm, 95% CI=0.24-0.40),半值MAX窗(±0.2 mm, 95% CI=0.14-0.30)。在半值窗口设置中,随着平均结石大小的减小,预测曲线会对齐并向左移动。结论骨窗法测量输尿管结石大小效果不理想。软组织和半值窗口的解读器变异性在亚毫米量级,对临床决策没有预期的影响。半值MAX窗口具有最小的解读器可变性,应考虑用于可重复和半自动输尿管结石大小测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书