Hypertension Medication Changes in Patients Prescribed Remote Monitoring.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Calvin J Winkler, Lucia C Petito, Yaw Peprah, Ji Young Lee, Hironori Sato, Stephen D Persell
{"title":"Hypertension Medication Changes in Patients Prescribed Remote Monitoring.","authors":"Calvin J Winkler, Lucia C Petito, Yaw Peprah, Ji Young Lee, Hironori Sato, Stephen D Persell","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote patient monitoring (RPM) includes home blood pressure (BP) measurement with readings sent directly to the electronic health record (EHR). We hypothesize that RPM facilitates quicker, more frequent, more appropriate antihypertensive medication changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with hypertension in 6 primary care clinics were prescribed RPM between November 2020 and August 2021 (N = 288) and matched to 4 control patients (N = 1152). Office and RPM BP readings and medication data over 18 months were extracted from the EHR. RPM patients were classified as baseline-controlled (office and RPM <130/<80 mmHg), sustained (office and RPM ≥130 and/or ≥80), white-coat (office ≥130 and/or ≥80, RPM <130/<80), or masked hypertension (office <130/<80, RPM ≥130 and/or ≥80).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RPM patients had earlier first antihypertensive medication changes, with half of RPM patients having ≥1 change by 228 days versus 530 days for controls. RPM patients had more total medication changes, with 25% of RPM patients having ≥4 (median 1; 25th-75th percentiles 0-4) changes versus ≥2 (median 1; 0-2) changes in controls. Compared to baseline sustained hypertension RPM users, white-coat hypertension users were less likely to have ≥1 medication increase (24% [N = 11] versus 53% [N = 74], P = .001) within 12 months. Compared to baseline-controlled RPM users, masked hypertension users were less likely to have ≥1 medication decrease (0% [N = 0] versus 44% [N = 8]; P = .003) within 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even without additional staff dedicated to medication adjustment, RPM facilitated quicker medication changes, more total changes, and differential prescribing decisions for white-coat and masked hypertension patients supporting RPM use in primary care.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05562921.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"563-569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) includes home blood pressure (BP) measurement with readings sent directly to the electronic health record (EHR). We hypothesize that RPM facilitates quicker, more frequent, more appropriate antihypertensive medication changes.

Methods: Patients with hypertension in 6 primary care clinics were prescribed RPM between November 2020 and August 2021 (N = 288) and matched to 4 control patients (N = 1152). Office and RPM BP readings and medication data over 18 months were extracted from the EHR. RPM patients were classified as baseline-controlled (office and RPM <130/<80 mmHg), sustained (office and RPM ≥130 and/or ≥80), white-coat (office ≥130 and/or ≥80, RPM <130/<80), or masked hypertension (office <130/<80, RPM ≥130 and/or ≥80).

Results: RPM patients had earlier first antihypertensive medication changes, with half of RPM patients having ≥1 change by 228 days versus 530 days for controls. RPM patients had more total medication changes, with 25% of RPM patients having ≥4 (median 1; 25th-75th percentiles 0-4) changes versus ≥2 (median 1; 0-2) changes in controls. Compared to baseline sustained hypertension RPM users, white-coat hypertension users were less likely to have ≥1 medication increase (24% [N = 11] versus 53% [N = 74], P = .001) within 12 months. Compared to baseline-controlled RPM users, masked hypertension users were less likely to have ≥1 medication decrease (0% [N = 0] versus 44% [N = 8]; P = .003) within 12 months.

Conclusions: Even without additional staff dedicated to medication adjustment, RPM facilitated quicker medication changes, more total changes, and differential prescribing decisions for white-coat and masked hypertension patients supporting RPM use in primary care.

Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05562921.

远程监测患者高血压用药的变化。
背景:远程患者监测(RPM)包括家庭血压(BP)测量,读数直接发送到电子健康记录(EHR)。我们假设RPM促进更快,更频繁,更适当的抗高血压药物的改变。方法:在2020年11月至2021年8月期间,6家初级保健诊所的高血压患者(N = 288)开了RPM处方,并与4名对照患者(N = 1152)匹配。从电子病历中提取办公室和RPM血压读数以及18个月的用药数据。RPM患者被分为基线对照(办公室和RPM)。结果:RPM患者有较早的首次降压药物改变,其中一半RPM患者在228天内有≥1次药物改变,而对照组为530天。RPM患者的总药物变化更多,25%的RPM患者发生≥4次(中位数为1;25 -75百分位数为0-4)变化,而对照组发生≥2次(中位数为1;0-2)变化。与基线持续高血压RPM使用者相比,白大褂高血压使用者在12个月内用药增加≥1次的可能性较小(24% [N = 11]对53% [N = 74], p = 0.001)。与基线对照的RPM使用者相比,蒙面高血压使用者在12个月内药物减少≥1次的可能性较小(0% [N = 0]对44% [N = 8]; p = 0.003)。结论:即使没有额外的人员专门负责药物调整,RPM也有助于在初级保健中支持使用RPM的白大褂和蒙面高血压患者更快地进行药物变化,更多地进行总变化和差异处方决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书