Development of sustainable tail grout through the utilization of shield muck and waste-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag

Yujun Du, Wei Liu, Peixin Shi, Wentao Li
{"title":"Development of sustainable tail grout through the utilization of shield muck and waste-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag","authors":"Yujun Du,&nbsp;Wei Liu,&nbsp;Peixin Shi,&nbsp;Wentao Li","doi":"10.1007/s42768-025-00263-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A huge amount of shield muck is generated during shield tunneling, and the reutilization of shield muck to produce tail grout has attracted growing attention, aiming to mitigate the environmental issues related to the transport and disposal of shield muck. However, conventional binders, such as cement, used in this technique are associated with high carbon emission. Therefore, this study investigates the use of low-carbon binder, i.e., carbide sludge (CS)-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), in shield muck treatment, aiming to achieve sustainable reutilization. Various commercial additives and phosphogypsum (PG), an industry waste, were added to further enhance the properties of treated shield muck. Results show that incorporating sulfate-containing additives to GGBS-CS-stabilized shield muck significantly reduced the setting time from 26.75 to 8.00–12.00 h, with Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and PG showing a relatively higher reducing rate. In addition, adding Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and PG to GGBS-CS-stabilized shield muck could enhance the 3-day strength by 67.0% and 37.0%, respectively, while their effects on improving the 28-day strength were marginal, yielding increases of just 16.0% and 0.4%. Results also indicated that additives led to a higher stone shrinkage rate of grout. Nonetheless, all additives posed negligible effects on the consistency and flowability. Microstructure analysis indicated that additives promoted the generation of ettringite (AFt) and aluminate ferrite monosulfate (AFm) phases. These phases consume free water and refine pores, leading to the higher stone shrinkage rate. Isothermal titration calorimetry highlighted that the additives affect the heat rate in the time interval of 4–50 h after mixing, and this should be the reason for the significant influence of additives on setting time and 3-day strength as well as limited impact on consistency and flowability. The findings confirmed the feasibility of using stabilized shield muck to produce tail grout, and PG is efficient in further enhancing its properties.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":807,"journal":{"name":"Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy","volume":"7 4","pages":"625 - 640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42768-025-00263-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A huge amount of shield muck is generated during shield tunneling, and the reutilization of shield muck to produce tail grout has attracted growing attention, aiming to mitigate the environmental issues related to the transport and disposal of shield muck. However, conventional binders, such as cement, used in this technique are associated with high carbon emission. Therefore, this study investigates the use of low-carbon binder, i.e., carbide sludge (CS)-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), in shield muck treatment, aiming to achieve sustainable reutilization. Various commercial additives and phosphogypsum (PG), an industry waste, were added to further enhance the properties of treated shield muck. Results show that incorporating sulfate-containing additives to GGBS-CS-stabilized shield muck significantly reduced the setting time from 26.75 to 8.00–12.00 h, with Na2SO4 and PG showing a relatively higher reducing rate. In addition, adding Na2SO4 and PG to GGBS-CS-stabilized shield muck could enhance the 3-day strength by 67.0% and 37.0%, respectively, while their effects on improving the 28-day strength were marginal, yielding increases of just 16.0% and 0.4%. Results also indicated that additives led to a higher stone shrinkage rate of grout. Nonetheless, all additives posed negligible effects on the consistency and flowability. Microstructure analysis indicated that additives promoted the generation of ettringite (AFt) and aluminate ferrite monosulfate (AFm) phases. These phases consume free water and refine pores, leading to the higher stone shrinkage rate. Isothermal titration calorimetry highlighted that the additives affect the heat rate in the time interval of 4–50 h after mixing, and this should be the reason for the significant influence of additives on setting time and 3-day strength as well as limited impact on consistency and flowability. The findings confirmed the feasibility of using stabilized shield muck to produce tail grout, and PG is efficient in further enhancing its properties.

Graphical Abstract

利用盾构渣土和废活化磨粒高炉矿渣开发可持续尾浆
盾构隧道开挖过程中产生了大量盾构泥,利用盾构泥生产尾浆的研究日益受到人们的关注,旨在缓解盾构泥运输和处置带来的环境问题。然而,在这种技术中使用的传统粘合剂,如水泥,与高碳排放有关。因此,本研究将碳化物污泥(CS)-活化矿渣(GGBS)作为低碳粘结剂应用于盾构渣土处理,实现可持续回用。为了进一步提高处理后的盾构泥的性能,加入了各种商业添加剂和工业废物磷石膏。结果表明:在ggbs - cs稳定的盾状土中加入含硫酸盐的添加剂,可显著缩短凝结时间,凝结时间由26.75 h缩短至8.00 ~ 12.00 h,其中Na2SO4和PG的还原速率相对较高;此外,在ggbs - cs稳定的盾构土中添加Na2SO4和PG可以分别提高3天强度67.0%和37.0%,而对28天强度的提高作用微不足道,产量仅增加16.0%和0.4%。结果还表明,添加物对灌浆石的收缩率有较大影响。尽管如此,所有添加剂对稠度和流动性的影响都可以忽略不计。显微组织分析表明,添加剂促进了钙矾石(AFt)相和单硫酸铝酸铁氧体(AFm)相的生成。这些相消耗游离水,细化孔隙,导致较高的石材收缩率。等温滴定量热法强调,添加剂在混合后4 ~ 50h的时间间隔内影响热速率,这应该是添加剂对凝固时间和3天强度影响显著,而对稠度和流动性影响有限的原因。研究结果证实了利用稳定盾构渣土生产尾浆的可行性,PG可有效地进一步提高其性能。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书