The role of regularity detection and prediction in the exploration of sense of agency

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Consciousness and Cognition Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103980
Kazuma Takada , Wen Wen , Shunichi Kasahara , Tom Froese
{"title":"The role of regularity detection and prediction in the exploration of sense of agency","authors":"Kazuma Takada ,&nbsp;Wen Wen ,&nbsp;Shunichi Kasahara ,&nbsp;Tom Froese","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Sense of Agency (SoA) refers to the subjective feeling of controlling one’s actions and outcomes. Both the predictive and retrospective processes are considered to contribute to this subjective feeling. The predictive process focuses on the consistency between the sensory prediction and the actual sensory input by the internal model, while the retrospective process emphasizes the detection of regularities between one’s action and sensory input. However, how the two types of processes contribute to the exploration of control remains unclear. In the present study, we tackled this question by examining the effect of updating the internal model on the SoA in a control detection task. Participants first adapted to a rotation of visual feedback while controlling a dot on the screen, then conducted free movements to choose the dot they felt they could control most effectively among five dots with different rotation angles. Experiment 1 used a tracking task for the motor adaptation, while Experiment 2 used a reaching task to replicate the result of Experiment 1. The results of the motor adaptation in both experiments did not have a significant effect on the control detection task. This indicates that updating the internal model appears to have little influence on the regularity detection. Accordingly, we suggest that participants’ SoA was more dependent on retrospective than predictive processes during exploration of the SoA. These findings provide important insights for understanding the SoA in the context of exploratory behaviors within novel environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103980"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810025001734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sense of Agency (SoA) refers to the subjective feeling of controlling one’s actions and outcomes. Both the predictive and retrospective processes are considered to contribute to this subjective feeling. The predictive process focuses on the consistency between the sensory prediction and the actual sensory input by the internal model, while the retrospective process emphasizes the detection of regularities between one’s action and sensory input. However, how the two types of processes contribute to the exploration of control remains unclear. In the present study, we tackled this question by examining the effect of updating the internal model on the SoA in a control detection task. Participants first adapted to a rotation of visual feedback while controlling a dot on the screen, then conducted free movements to choose the dot they felt they could control most effectively among five dots with different rotation angles. Experiment 1 used a tracking task for the motor adaptation, while Experiment 2 used a reaching task to replicate the result of Experiment 1. The results of the motor adaptation in both experiments did not have a significant effect on the control detection task. This indicates that updating the internal model appears to have little influence on the regularity detection. Accordingly, we suggest that participants’ SoA was more dependent on retrospective than predictive processes during exploration of the SoA. These findings provide important insights for understanding the SoA in the context of exploratory behaviors within novel environments.
规则检测与预测在代理感探索中的作用
代理感(SoA)是指控制自己行为和结果的主观感觉。预测过程和回顾过程都被认为有助于这种主观感觉。预测过程侧重于内部模型的感官预测与实际感官输入的一致性,而回顾过程则侧重于发现自己的行为与感官输入之间的规律性。然而,这两种类型的过程如何有助于探索控制尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们通过检查在控制检测任务中更新内部模型对SoA的影响来解决这个问题。参与者首先在控制屏幕上的一个点时适应视觉反馈的旋转,然后进行自由运动,在五个不同旋转角度的点中选择他们认为最有效控制的点。实验1采用跟踪任务进行运动适应,实验2采用伸手任务复制实验1的结果。两个实验的运动适应结果对控制检测任务没有显著影响。这表明内部模型的更新对规律性检测的影响不大。因此,我们建议参与者的SoA在探索SoA期间更多地依赖于回顾而不是预测过程。这些发现为在新环境中的探索性行为上下文中理解SoA提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书