Perturbance and Animation

IF 1.2 4区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Marcello Barison
{"title":"Perturbance and Animation","authors":"Marcello Barison","doi":"10.1007/s10699-025-10011-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay interrogates the Freudian conception of the <jats:italic>Unheimliche</jats:italic> by reinterpreting it through the dual categories of perturbance and animation. Taking Roger Corman’s <jats:italic>X: The Man with the X-Ray Eyes</jats:italic> as a privileged site of analysis, it argues that the film not only stages but radically exposes the very dimension that Freud’s text systematically dissimulates: the nexus between ocularity, animation, and the death drive. Whereas Freud sublimates the perturbing into the castration complex, Corman dramatizes its irreducible link with blinding, thereby rendering visible the removed of psychoanalysis. The essay proposes “Perturbance” as the ontological oscillation immanent to beings, the universal radiation that makes them appear mysteriously alive. From this perspective, psychoanalysis is constituted precisely by its removal of perturbance, whereas cinema, by externalizing psychic nexuses in representation, fulfills the repressed possibility of psychoanalysis without removal. Through a dialogue between Freud, Hoffmann’s <jats:italic>Sandman</jats:italic> , the Oedipal paradigm, and Corman’s visionary film, the study delineates a psychophysical ontology in which animation is no longer confined to the living subject but revealed as the fundamental energetic quality of all that is.","PeriodicalId":55146,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Science","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-025-10011-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay interrogates the Freudian conception of the Unheimliche by reinterpreting it through the dual categories of perturbance and animation. Taking Roger Corman’s X: The Man with the X-Ray Eyes as a privileged site of analysis, it argues that the film not only stages but radically exposes the very dimension that Freud’s text systematically dissimulates: the nexus between ocularity, animation, and the death drive. Whereas Freud sublimates the perturbing into the castration complex, Corman dramatizes its irreducible link with blinding, thereby rendering visible the removed of psychoanalysis. The essay proposes “Perturbance” as the ontological oscillation immanent to beings, the universal radiation that makes them appear mysteriously alive. From this perspective, psychoanalysis is constituted precisely by its removal of perturbance, whereas cinema, by externalizing psychic nexuses in representation, fulfills the repressed possibility of psychoanalysis without removal. Through a dialogue between Freud, Hoffmann’s Sandman , the Oedipal paradigm, and Corman’s visionary film, the study delineates a psychophysical ontology in which animation is no longer confined to the living subject but revealed as the fundamental energetic quality of all that is.
摄动与动画
本文通过对扰动和动画的双重范畴的重新诠释,对弗洛伊德的无意识概念进行了质疑。以罗杰·科曼的《X: X光眼睛的男人》为例,它认为这部电影不仅展示了,而且从根本上揭示了弗洛伊德的文本系统地掩盖的维度:视觉、动画和死亡驱动之间的联系。弗洛伊德将不安升华为阉割情结,而科曼将其与致盲的不可还原的联系戏剧化,从而使精神分析的移除变得可见。本文认为“扰动”是存在内在的本体论振荡,是使存在神秘地活着的普遍辐射。从这个角度来看,精神分析正是通过消除干扰而构成的,而电影通过在表现中外化精神联系,在没有移除的情况下实现了精神分析被压抑的可能性。通过弗洛伊德、霍夫曼的睡魔、俄狄浦斯范式和科曼的梦幻电影之间的对话,这项研究描绘了一种心理物理本体论,在这种本体论中,动画不再局限于活生生的主体,而是作为一切存在的基本能量品质被揭示出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foundations of Science
Foundations of Science HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Foundations of Science focuses on methodological and philosophical topics of foundational significance concerning the structure and the growth of science. It serves as a forum for exchange of views and ideas among working scientists and theorists of science and it seeks to promote interdisciplinary cooperation. Since the various scientific disciplines have become so specialized and inaccessible to workers in different areas of science, one of the goals of the journal is to present the foundational issues of science in a way that is free from unnecessary technicalities yet faithful to the scientific content. The aim of the journal is not simply to identify and highlight foundational issues and problems, but to suggest constructive solutions to the problems. The editors of the journal admit that various sciences have approaches and methods that are peculiar to those individual sciences. However, they hold the view that important truths can be discovered about and by the sciences and that truths transcend cultural and political contexts. Although properly conducted historical and sociological inquiries can explain some aspects of the scientific enterprise, the editors believe that the central foundational questions of contemporary science can be posed and answered without recourse to sociological or historical methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书