So-Young Oh, J. Burk-Rafel, I. Reinstein, R. Hatala, P. W. M. Van Gerven, F. W. J. M. Smeenk, M. V. Pusic
{"title":"The first step in visual diagnosis: a study of novices developing the ability to distinguish normal from abnormal cases","authors":"So-Young Oh, J. Burk-Rafel, I. Reinstein, R. Hatala, P. W. M. Van Gerven, F. W. J. M. Smeenk, M. V. Pusic","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10490-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Visual diagnosis training in medicine often struggles to efficiently build learners’ skill, with existing instructional approaches lacking consensus and showing variable effectiveness. This study introduces a two-phase conceptual framework for visual diagnosis training, using electrocardiogram interpretation as an example to explore how novices develop discriminatory skills and diagnostic certainty. Through a prospective cohort study involving 78 medical students and residents who completed at least 75 cases with demonstrated improvement, we applied a version of item-response modeling to analyze their learning trajectories. Findings showed that diagnostic cases could be represented on a continuous scale from normal to abnormal, with a “confusability zone” where cases are difficult to classify. Participants’ ability to calibrate diagnostic certainty improved modestly, reflected in more organized use of certainty ratings. Learning curves showed that the ability to distinguish normal from abnormal developed earlier and more rapidly than the capacity to assign specific diagnostic labels, with both skills improving over time but at different rates. These results suggest that visual diagnosis training could be structured in distinct phases, beginning with abnormality detection and progressing to detailed diagnostic classification. The framework supports targeted curriculum design, including the use of confusable cases for focused training and monitoring of diagnostic certainty as an educational assessment tool, with likely broad applicability across medical imaging domains.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"31 4","pages":"1153 - 1170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-025-10490-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Visual diagnosis training in medicine often struggles to efficiently build learners’ skill, with existing instructional approaches lacking consensus and showing variable effectiveness. This study introduces a two-phase conceptual framework for visual diagnosis training, using electrocardiogram interpretation as an example to explore how novices develop discriminatory skills and diagnostic certainty. Through a prospective cohort study involving 78 medical students and residents who completed at least 75 cases with demonstrated improvement, we applied a version of item-response modeling to analyze their learning trajectories. Findings showed that diagnostic cases could be represented on a continuous scale from normal to abnormal, with a “confusability zone” where cases are difficult to classify. Participants’ ability to calibrate diagnostic certainty improved modestly, reflected in more organized use of certainty ratings. Learning curves showed that the ability to distinguish normal from abnormal developed earlier and more rapidly than the capacity to assign specific diagnostic labels, with both skills improving over time but at different rates. These results suggest that visual diagnosis training could be structured in distinct phases, beginning with abnormality detection and progressing to detailed diagnostic classification. The framework supports targeted curriculum design, including the use of confusable cases for focused training and monitoring of diagnostic certainty as an educational assessment tool, with likely broad applicability across medical imaging domains.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.