Innovative oncology trial designs: Time to act – A review with recommendations of the Cancer Drug Development Forum

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Cancer Policy Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100696
Rosa Giuliani , Nafsika Kronidou-Horst , Christina Yap , Aáron Sosa Mejia , Lada Leyens , Theodor Framke , Fergus Sweeney , Laurence Collette , Rachel Giles , Jan Bogaerts , Peter van de Ven , Stefan N. Symeonides
{"title":"Innovative oncology trial designs: Time to act – A review with recommendations of the Cancer Drug Development Forum","authors":"Rosa Giuliani ,&nbsp;Nafsika Kronidou-Horst ,&nbsp;Christina Yap ,&nbsp;Aáron Sosa Mejia ,&nbsp;Lada Leyens ,&nbsp;Theodor Framke ,&nbsp;Fergus Sweeney ,&nbsp;Laurence Collette ,&nbsp;Rachel Giles ,&nbsp;Jan Bogaerts ,&nbsp;Peter van de Ven ,&nbsp;Stefan N. Symeonides","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Clinical oncology trial design constantly adapts and evolves to meet the needs of all stakeholders, from patients to regulators. This evolution has however also led to an increase in the complexity of clinical development, and investigators are expected to invest more time and money in planning and running their studies and overall clinical and regulatory pathway.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Here we review recent innovations in trial designs, study endpoints, and relevant regulatory guidelines, before making recommendations to enhance the clinical trial ecosystem in the EU.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Innovative clinical study designs that go beyond traditional randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials often promise greater flexibility and efficiency in the conduct of oncology studies, but adoption has been slow. Furthermore, the increased complexity associated with innovative trials means that coordination between all relevant stakeholders is essential to every phase of clinical development. Despite recent advances, there is a risk that Europe is becoming seen as a less attractive location for clinical trials, and this article outlines initiatives and possible steps to improve patient access to medicines and processes across Europe.</div></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><div>Innovative trial designs promise more efficient, flexible, and inclusive clinical trials, but more needs to be done to encourage their adoption if the advantages outweigh the limitations. Partnership and coordination between all stakeholders, from patients to regulators, and at all phases, is more important than ever. Finally, effective action is needed to make Europe a more attractive destination for clinical research and to improve access to innovative medicines for patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538325001407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical oncology trial design constantly adapts and evolves to meet the needs of all stakeholders, from patients to regulators. This evolution has however also led to an increase in the complexity of clinical development, and investigators are expected to invest more time and money in planning and running their studies and overall clinical and regulatory pathway.

Methods

Here we review recent innovations in trial designs, study endpoints, and relevant regulatory guidelines, before making recommendations to enhance the clinical trial ecosystem in the EU.

Results

Innovative clinical study designs that go beyond traditional randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials often promise greater flexibility and efficiency in the conduct of oncology studies, but adoption has been slow. Furthermore, the increased complexity associated with innovative trials means that coordination between all relevant stakeholders is essential to every phase of clinical development. Despite recent advances, there is a risk that Europe is becoming seen as a less attractive location for clinical trials, and this article outlines initiatives and possible steps to improve patient access to medicines and processes across Europe.

Policy summary

Innovative trial designs promise more efficient, flexible, and inclusive clinical trials, but more needs to be done to encourage their adoption if the advantages outweigh the limitations. Partnership and coordination between all stakeholders, from patients to regulators, and at all phases, is more important than ever. Finally, effective action is needed to make Europe a more attractive destination for clinical research and to improve access to innovative medicines for patients.
创新肿瘤试验设计:癌症药物发展论坛建议的回顾。
(最多250个)前言:临床肿瘤试验设计不断适应和发展,以满足从患者到监管机构的所有利益相关者的需求。然而,这种演变也导致临床开发的复杂性增加,研究人员预计将投入更多的时间和金钱来规划和运行他们的研究以及整体临床和监管途径。方法:在本文中,我们回顾了最近在试验设计、研究终点和相关监管指南方面的创新,然后提出了加强欧盟临床试验生态系统的建议。结果:创新的临床研究设计超越了传统的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,通常承诺在肿瘤研究中具有更大的灵活性和效率,但采用速度缓慢。此外,与创新试验相关的复杂性增加意味着所有相关利益相关者之间的协调对于临床开发的每个阶段都至关重要。尽管最近取得了进展,但欧洲有可能成为临床试验的一个不那么有吸引力的地点,部分原因可能是监管挑战和操作复杂性。需要做更多的工作来改善整个欧洲患者获得药物和治疗的机会。政策摘要:创新的试验设计有望提高临床试验的效率、灵活性和包容性,但如果其优点大于局限性,则需要做更多的工作来鼓励采用这些试验。从患者到监管机构的所有利益攸关方之间在所有阶段的伙伴关系和协调比以往任何时候都更加重要。最后,如果欧洲不希望临床试验研究的专业知识和投资落后于世界其他地区,就迫切需要采取有效行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书