An alternative view on the ethics of synthetic biology: an Indian Hindu perspective.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2025.2518798
Varsha Aravind Paleri
{"title":"An alternative view on the ethics of synthetic biology: an Indian Hindu perspective.","authors":"Varsha Aravind Paleri","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2025.2518798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Synthetic Biology (SynBio) is a rapidly advancing interdisciplinary field that holds immense potential to address pressing global issues, including food insecurity, medical innovation, and environmental sustainability. Yet, the ethical discourse surrounding its development has often struggled to keep pace with its scientific progress. This stagnation, I argue, arises largely from the persistence of dualistic frameworks - such as \"natural\" versus \"artificial\" or \"human\" versus \"machine\" - that dominate bioethical inquiry. These dichotomies limit the scope of moral reflection and hinder the development of more holistic ethical frameworks. This paper seeks to reframe these debates by drawing upon the non-dualistic worldview of <i>Sanātana Dharma</i>, the foundation of Indian Hindu philosophy. Through this lens, I propose a different perspective that emphasizes interconnectedness, responsibility, and reverence for all forms of life, natural and synthetic alike, offering a more inclusive and holistic approach to evaluate emerging biotechnologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":"36 1","pages":"2518798"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12716465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2025.2518798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synthetic Biology (SynBio) is a rapidly advancing interdisciplinary field that holds immense potential to address pressing global issues, including food insecurity, medical innovation, and environmental sustainability. Yet, the ethical discourse surrounding its development has often struggled to keep pace with its scientific progress. This stagnation, I argue, arises largely from the persistence of dualistic frameworks - such as "natural" versus "artificial" or "human" versus "machine" - that dominate bioethical inquiry. These dichotomies limit the scope of moral reflection and hinder the development of more holistic ethical frameworks. This paper seeks to reframe these debates by drawing upon the non-dualistic worldview of Sanātana Dharma, the foundation of Indian Hindu philosophy. Through this lens, I propose a different perspective that emphasizes interconnectedness, responsibility, and reverence for all forms of life, natural and synthetic alike, offering a more inclusive and holistic approach to evaluate emerging biotechnologies.

合成生物学伦理的另一种观点:印度教徒的观点。
合成生物学(SynBio)是一个快速发展的跨学科领域,在解决紧迫的全球问题方面具有巨大的潜力,包括粮食不安全、医疗创新和环境可持续性。然而,围绕其发展的伦理话语往往难以跟上其科学进步的步伐。我认为,这种停滞在很大程度上源于二元框架的持续存在——比如“自然”与“人工”或“人类”与“机器”——这些二元框架主导着生物伦理研究。这些二分法限制了道德反思的范围,阻碍了更全面的伦理框架的发展。本文试图通过借鉴Sanātana达摩(印度印度教哲学的基础)的非二元论世界观来重新构建这些辩论。通过这个视角,我提出了一个不同的观点,强调相互联系、责任和对所有形式的生命的尊重,无论是自然的还是合成的,提供了一个更具包容性和整体性的方法来评估新兴的生物技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书