Measurement Properties of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the PDAQ-15.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Núbia Isabela Macêdo Martins, Rodrigo Oliveira Mazza, Ana Elisa Lemos Silva, Daniel Weintraub, Vera Lúcia Santos de Britto, Clynton Lourenço Correa
{"title":"Measurement Properties of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the PDAQ-15.","authors":"Núbia Isabela Macêdo Martins, Rodrigo Oliveira Mazza, Ana Elisa Lemos Silva, Daniel Weintraub, Vera Lúcia Santos de Britto, Clynton Lourenço Correa","doi":"10.1177/08919887251408854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe Penn Parkinson's Daily Activities Questionnaire (PDAQ-15) assesses the difficulty in performing cognitive instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in people with Parkinson's disease (PD).ObjectivesTo translate, cross-culturally adapt and investigate measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the PDAQ-15 Knowledgeable Informant (KI) and Patient (PT).MethodsFollowing the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, face and content validity analyses; floor and ceiling effects, reliability (test-retest, inter-rater, internal consistency) and validity (convergent, divergent, discriminant) were evaluated in 50 persons with PD and their KI. The KI and Patient PDAQ-15 were rater-administered.ResultsThe translated and adapted KI and PT PDAQ-15 did not show floor or ceiling effects. They had appropriate internal consistency (PT = 0.825; KI = 0.923), excellent test-retest (PT = 0.97; KI = 0.99) and interrater reliability (PT = 0.92; KI = 0.99). PT and KI agreement was moderate, ICC = 0.58. The correlations with the Scales for Outcomes of Parkinson's disease - Cognition were: PT (rho = 0.50), KI (rho = 0.67); with the Direct Assessment of Functional Status: PT (rho = 0.66), KI (rho = 0.80); with Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II: PT (rho = -0.29), KI (rho = -0.30), all <i>P</i> < 0.05; and with UPDRS part III: PT (rho = -0.27), KI (rho = -0.27), <i>P</i> > 0.05. PT and KI PDAQ-15 discriminated between the mild and moderate/severe stages of the Hoehn & Yahr Scale (<i>P</i> = 0.03).ConclusionThe two Brazilian versions of the PDAQ-15 have acceptable measurement properties for assessing the cognitive IADL of persons with PD. For those with suspected or diagnosed cognitive impairment, the application of both versions is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"613-623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251408854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe Penn Parkinson's Daily Activities Questionnaire (PDAQ-15) assesses the difficulty in performing cognitive instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in people with Parkinson's disease (PD).ObjectivesTo translate, cross-culturally adapt and investigate measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the PDAQ-15 Knowledgeable Informant (KI) and Patient (PT).MethodsFollowing the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, face and content validity analyses; floor and ceiling effects, reliability (test-retest, inter-rater, internal consistency) and validity (convergent, divergent, discriminant) were evaluated in 50 persons with PD and their KI. The KI and Patient PDAQ-15 were rater-administered.ResultsThe translated and adapted KI and PT PDAQ-15 did not show floor or ceiling effects. They had appropriate internal consistency (PT = 0.825; KI = 0.923), excellent test-retest (PT = 0.97; KI = 0.99) and interrater reliability (PT = 0.92; KI = 0.99). PT and KI agreement was moderate, ICC = 0.58. The correlations with the Scales for Outcomes of Parkinson's disease - Cognition were: PT (rho = 0.50), KI (rho = 0.67); with the Direct Assessment of Functional Status: PT (rho = 0.66), KI (rho = 0.80); with Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II: PT (rho = -0.29), KI (rho = -0.30), all P < 0.05; and with UPDRS part III: PT (rho = -0.27), KI (rho = -0.27), P > 0.05. PT and KI PDAQ-15 discriminated between the mild and moderate/severe stages of the Hoehn & Yahr Scale (P = 0.03).ConclusionThe two Brazilian versions of the PDAQ-15 have acceptable measurement properties for assessing the cognitive IADL of persons with PD. For those with suspected or diagnosed cognitive impairment, the application of both versions is suggested.

巴西葡萄牙语版PDAQ-15的测量特性。
宾夕法尼亚大学帕金森日常活动问卷(PDAQ-15)评估帕金森病(PD)患者进行日常生活认知工具活动(IADL)的难度。目的翻译、跨文化适应和研究巴西版PDAQ-15知识灵通者(KI)和患者(PT)的测量特性。方法采用跨文化翻译、面孔分析和内容效度分析;对50例PD患者及其KI进行了地板效应和天花板效应、信度(重测、内部一致性、内部一致性)和效度(收敛性、发散性、判别性)评估。KI和患者PDAQ-15分级给药。结果KI和PT PDAQ-15的翻译和改编均不存在下限或上限效应。其内部一致性(PT = 0.825; KI = 0.923)、重测(PT = 0.97; KI = 0.99)和量表间信度(PT = 0.92; KI = 0.99)均较好。PT和KI一致性中等,ICC = 0.58。与帕金森病结局-认知量表的相关性为:PT (rho = 0.50)、KI (rho = 0.67);功能状态直接评价:PT (rho = 0.66)、KI (rho = 0.80);统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)第二部分:PT (rho = -0.29)、KI (rho = -0.30), P均< 0.05;UPDRS第三部分:PT (rho = -0.27), KI (rho = -0.27), P < 0.05。PT和KI PDAQ-15区分Hoehn & Yahr量表的轻度和中/重度(P = 0.03)。结论两种巴西版PDAQ-15对PD患者的认知性IADL具有可接受的测量特性。对于那些怀疑或诊断为认知障碍的人,建议使用这两种版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书