Balancing creativity and pragmatism: insights from a curriculum for interprofessional learning at Linköping University.

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Maria Kvarnström, Susanne Kvarnström, Elin A Karlsson
{"title":"Balancing creativity and pragmatism: insights from a curriculum for interprofessional learning at Linköping University.","authors":"Maria Kvarnström, Susanne Kvarnström, Elin A Karlsson","doi":"10.5116/ijme.6931.a9c2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explores the application of the current curriculum, launched in 2016, for interprofessional learning (IPL) at the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences at Linköping University, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Perceptions from students, teachers and key persons (n=19) were investigated with focus groups and individual interviews. The interviews explored perceptions of curriculum design, implementation, and interprofessional learning activities. A four-dimensional framework for curriculum development and evaluation constituted the theoretical lens for the analysis. Specifically, a qualitative directed content analysis was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four overarching categories were identified. 1) \"Aiming towards high quality healthcare professionals working together naturally\", included the arguments for IPL within healthcare and why the curriculum revision was conducted. 2) \"Comprehending how to work in a group, a team, and an interprofessional team\", related to the desired learning outcomes and competencies. 3) \"All on board? - The search for meaningful learning activities for students and teachers that the programs embrace\", reflected on how learning activities were designed and experienced. 4) \"Enhancing legitimacy and the provision of organizational prerequisites for the curriculum\", described the organisational structures for enhancing the legitimacy of the IPL curriculum, as well as the role of teachers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasizes balancing pedagogical innovation with pragmatic considerations for successful curriculum application. The findings highlight the need for experienced teachers, organisational support, and meaningful learning activities that align with both program-specific and interprofessional outcomes. Despite challenges, the current curriculum at Linköping University shows potential as a model for integrating interprofessional learning into health professions education.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"16 ","pages":"192-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12756881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.6931.a9c2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study explores the application of the current curriculum, launched in 2016, for interprofessional learning (IPL) at the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences at Linköping University, Sweden.

Methods: Perceptions from students, teachers and key persons (n=19) were investigated with focus groups and individual interviews. The interviews explored perceptions of curriculum design, implementation, and interprofessional learning activities. A four-dimensional framework for curriculum development and evaluation constituted the theoretical lens for the analysis. Specifically, a qualitative directed content analysis was used.

Results: Four overarching categories were identified. 1) "Aiming towards high quality healthcare professionals working together naturally", included the arguments for IPL within healthcare and why the curriculum revision was conducted. 2) "Comprehending how to work in a group, a team, and an interprofessional team", related to the desired learning outcomes and competencies. 3) "All on board? - The search for meaningful learning activities for students and teachers that the programs embrace", reflected on how learning activities were designed and experienced. 4) "Enhancing legitimacy and the provision of organizational prerequisites for the curriculum", described the organisational structures for enhancing the legitimacy of the IPL curriculum, as well as the role of teachers.

Conclusions: This study emphasizes balancing pedagogical innovation with pragmatic considerations for successful curriculum application. The findings highlight the need for experienced teachers, organisational support, and meaningful learning activities that align with both program-specific and interprofessional outcomes. Despite challenges, the current curriculum at Linköping University shows potential as a model for integrating interprofessional learning into health professions education.

平衡创造力和实用主义:来自Linköping大学跨专业学习课程的见解。
目的:本研究探讨了2016年启动的现行课程在瑞典Linköping大学医学与健康科学学院跨专业学习(IPL)中的应用。方法:采用焦点小组和个别访谈的方法,对19名学生、教师和关键人物的认知进行调查。访谈探讨了对课程设计、实施和跨专业学习活动的看法。课程开发与评价的四维框架构成了分析的理论视角。具体来说,使用了定性定向内容分析。结果:确定了四个主要类别。1)“旨在培养高质量的医疗保健专业人员自然地合作”,包括在医疗保健中进行IPL的论点以及为什么要进行课程修订。2)“理解如何在团队、团队和跨专业团队中工作”,与期望的学习成果和能力相关。“都上船了吗?”-为学生和教师寻找有意义的学习活动”,反思学习活动是如何设计和体验的。4)“提高课程的合法性和提供课程的组织先决条件”,描述了提高IPL课程合法性的组织结构,以及教师的作用。结论:本研究强调平衡教学创新与课程成功应用的实用考量。研究结果强调了对经验丰富的教师、组织支持和有意义的学习活动的需求,这些活动与特定项目和跨专业成果相一致。尽管面临挑战,Linköping大学目前的课程显示出将跨专业学习纳入卫生专业教育的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书