Supplementation effects of feed additive containing eggshell, Schisandra chinensis by-products combined with multi-probiotics strains in laying hens.

IF 3.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Journal of Animal Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-30 DOI:10.5187/jast.2024.e119
Ah-Ran Lee, Sol-Hee Kim, Hangsul Cho, Yan-Qing Wang, Soo-Ki Kim
{"title":"Supplementation effects of feed additive containing eggshell, <i>Schisandra chinensis</i> by-products combined with multi-probiotics strains in laying hens.","authors":"Ah-Ran Lee, Sol-Hee Kim, Hangsul Cho, Yan-Qing Wang, Soo-Ki Kim","doi":"10.5187/jast.2024.e119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eggshell waste and <i>Schisandra chinensis</i> by-products are natural sources rich in beneficial nutrients and bioactive compounds. However, their combined effects with multi-probiotics on poultry productivity and health remain unexplored. This study assessed the immediate effects of a feed additive-eggshell waste (ES), <i>Schisandra chinensis</i> by-product (SC), and multi-probiotics (M)-administered for four weeks to aged laying hens before slaughter, evaluating the improvements of laying performance, egg quality, blood characteristics, visceral organs, tibia, and cecal microbiota. A total of 216 Hy-line Brown laying hens (70-week-old) were assigned to four dietary treatments consisting of 9 replicates of 6 birds in a completely randomized design. The combination of eggshell waste, <i>Schisandra chinensis</i> by-product, and multi-probiotics (ESM) of feed additive consisted of 40% eggshell, 5% SC, and 10<sup>9</sup>-10<sup>11</sup> CFU/g of multi-probiotic strains including <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>, <i>Bacillus licheniformis</i>, <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>, <i>Lactobacillus plantarum</i>, and supplemental nutrient premix. The treatment groups were as follows: corn-soybean meal-based basal diet (control); basal diet + 0.1% ESM; basal diet + 0.2% ESM, basal diet + 0.4% ESM. The total egg productivity rate during the experiment period tended to improve in ESM 0.2%, as compared with the control. The ESM 0.1% group increased egg weight (<i>p</i> < 0.05) while ESM 0.1% and ESM 0.2% tended to increase egg mass, compared to the control (<i>p</i> = 0.051). However, there was no significant difference in egg weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and egg quality among the treatments. Furthermore, blood characteristics did not differ between the treatments, except for the total cholesterol contents, which was higher in ESM 0.4% treatment than the control (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ESM 0.4% supplementation showed a tendency for higher calcium, compared to the control. ESM 0.4% supplementation showed higher bone mineral density (BMD) of the tibia neck than the control (<i>p</i> < 0.01). All three ESM groups demonstrated a significant decrease in the abundance of <i>Bacteroidaceae</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and an increase in the abundance of <i>Lactobaillaceae</i> at the family level (<i>p</i> < 0.01). In conclusion, ESM fed hens showed beneficial effects on the egg weight, egg mass, BMD of tibia neck, and cecal microbiota in laying hens.</p>","PeriodicalId":14923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","volume":"67 6","pages":"1285-1301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12715450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2024.e119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eggshell waste and Schisandra chinensis by-products are natural sources rich in beneficial nutrients and bioactive compounds. However, their combined effects with multi-probiotics on poultry productivity and health remain unexplored. This study assessed the immediate effects of a feed additive-eggshell waste (ES), Schisandra chinensis by-product (SC), and multi-probiotics (M)-administered for four weeks to aged laying hens before slaughter, evaluating the improvements of laying performance, egg quality, blood characteristics, visceral organs, tibia, and cecal microbiota. A total of 216 Hy-line Brown laying hens (70-week-old) were assigned to four dietary treatments consisting of 9 replicates of 6 birds in a completely randomized design. The combination of eggshell waste, Schisandra chinensis by-product, and multi-probiotics (ESM) of feed additive consisted of 40% eggshell, 5% SC, and 109-1011 CFU/g of multi-probiotic strains including Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lactobacillus plantarum, and supplemental nutrient premix. The treatment groups were as follows: corn-soybean meal-based basal diet (control); basal diet + 0.1% ESM; basal diet + 0.2% ESM, basal diet + 0.4% ESM. The total egg productivity rate during the experiment period tended to improve in ESM 0.2%, as compared with the control. The ESM 0.1% group increased egg weight (p < 0.05) while ESM 0.1% and ESM 0.2% tended to increase egg mass, compared to the control (p = 0.051). However, there was no significant difference in egg weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and egg quality among the treatments. Furthermore, blood characteristics did not differ between the treatments, except for the total cholesterol contents, which was higher in ESM 0.4% treatment than the control (p < 0.05). ESM 0.4% supplementation showed a tendency for higher calcium, compared to the control. ESM 0.4% supplementation showed higher bone mineral density (BMD) of the tibia neck than the control (p < 0.01). All three ESM groups demonstrated a significant decrease in the abundance of Bacteroidaceae (p < 0.05), and an increase in the abundance of Lactobaillaceae at the family level (p < 0.01). In conclusion, ESM fed hens showed beneficial effects on the egg weight, egg mass, BMD of tibia neck, and cecal microbiota in laying hens.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

含蛋壳、五味子副产物复合多种益生菌饲料添加剂对蛋鸡的补充效果。
蛋壳废料和五味子副产品是富含有益营养物质和生物活性化合物的天然来源。然而,它们与多种益生菌联合使用对家禽生产和健康的影响尚不清楚。本研究评估了屠宰前饲喂4周的蛋鸡饲料添加剂——蛋壳废料(ES)、五味子副产物(SC)和多种益生菌(M)的直接效果,评估了产蛋性能、蛋品质、血液特征、内脏器官、胫骨和盲肠微生物群的改善情况。选用216只70周龄海兰褐蛋鸡,采用完全随机设计,分为4个饲粮处理,共9个重复,每重复6只鸡。蛋壳废弃物、五味子副产物与饲料添加剂复合益生菌(ESM)的组合为:蛋壳40%、SC 5%、枯草芽孢杆菌、地衣芽孢杆菌、啤酒酵母菌、植物乳杆菌109 ~ 1011 CFU/g,添加营养预混料。各处理组分别为:以玉米-豆粕为基础日粮(对照组);基础日粮+ 0.1% ESM;基础饲粮+ 0.2% ESM,基础饲粮+ 0.4% ESM。试验期总产蛋率在ESM处理下较对照有提高0.2%的趋势。与对照组相比,ESM 0.1%组蛋重增加(p < 0.05),而ESM 0.1%和ESM 0.2%组有增加蛋重的趋势(p = 0.051)。但在蛋重、采食量、饲料系数和蛋品质方面,各处理差异不显著。此外,除总胆固醇含量(0.4% ESM组高于对照组)外,各组血液指标无显著差异(p < 0.05)。与对照组相比,添加0.4%的ESM有较高钙含量的趋势。添加0.4% ESM后,胫骨颈骨密度显著高于对照组(p < 0.01)。3个ESM组的拟杆菌科(Bacteroidaceae)丰度均显著降低(p < 0.05),乳杆菌科(Lactobaillaceae)丰度均显著升高(p < 0.01)。综上所述,ESM饲粮对蛋鸡的蛋重、蛋质量、胫骨颈骨密度和盲肠菌群均有有益影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Journal of Animal Science and Technology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Sci. Technol. or JAST) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, review articles and notes in all fields of animal science. Topics covered by the journal include: genetics and breeding, physiology, nutrition of monogastric animals, nutrition of ruminants, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, grasslands and roughages, livestock environment, animal biotechnology, animal behavior and welfare. Articles generally report research involving beef cattle, dairy cattle, pigs, companion animals, goats, horses, and sheep. However, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will also be considered for publication. The Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Technol. or JAST) has been the official journal of The Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) since 2000, formerly known as The Korean Journal of Animal Sciences (launched in 1956).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书