Population-based screening colonoscopy in Korea: balancing benefits and limitations.

IF 4.7 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Intestinal Research Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-02 DOI:10.5217/ir.2025.00188
Hyoung Il Choi, Jae Myung Cha
{"title":"Population-based screening colonoscopy in Korea: balancing benefits and limitations.","authors":"Hyoung Il Choi, Jae Myung Cha","doi":"10.5217/ir.2025.00188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Population-based colonoscopy screening is considered one of the most effective strategies for reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Its major strength lies in its dual benefits: early detection of colorectal cancer and prevention via the removal of precancerous lesions. Colonoscopy has a high sensitivity and provides a full colonic evaluation in a single session, thereby reducing the need for frequent testing. However, this approach has notable limitations. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure associated with rare but serious complications such as perforation and bleeding. Participation rates tend to be lower than those of noninvasive methods like fecal immunochemical tests. Additionally, implementing colonoscopy as a populationbased tool requires significant resources, including trained endoscopists, endoscopy facilities, and financial investments. The quality of colonoscopy may also vary depending on the operator's skill and adherence to guidelines. Given these trade-offs, population-based colonoscopy screening must be carefully evaluated in terms of cost-effectiveness, feasibility, and public acceptance within each country's healthcare system. Therefore, population-based colonoscopy screening should be approached with a balanced understanding of its benefits and limitations to ensure cost-effectiveness, feasibility, alignment with each country's healthcare infrastructure, and integration with existing screening programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14481,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Research","volume":" ","pages":"417-427"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13434517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intestinal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population-based colonoscopy screening is considered one of the most effective strategies for reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Its major strength lies in its dual benefits: early detection of colorectal cancer and prevention via the removal of precancerous lesions. Colonoscopy has a high sensitivity and provides a full colonic evaluation in a single session, thereby reducing the need for frequent testing. However, this approach has notable limitations. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure associated with rare but serious complications such as perforation and bleeding. Participation rates tend to be lower than those of noninvasive methods like fecal immunochemical tests. Additionally, implementing colonoscopy as a populationbased tool requires significant resources, including trained endoscopists, endoscopy facilities, and financial investments. The quality of colonoscopy may also vary depending on the operator's skill and adherence to guidelines. Given these trade-offs, population-based colonoscopy screening must be carefully evaluated in terms of cost-effectiveness, feasibility, and public acceptance within each country's healthcare system. Therefore, population-based colonoscopy screening should be approached with a balanced understanding of its benefits and limitations to ensure cost-effectiveness, feasibility, alignment with each country's healthcare infrastructure, and integration with existing screening programs.

韩国基于人群的结肠镜筛查:利弊平衡。
以人群为基础的结肠镜筛查被认为是降低结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的最有效策略之一。它的主要优势在于它的双重好处:早期发现结直肠癌和通过切除癌前病变进行预防。结肠镜检查具有高灵敏度,可在一次检查中提供完整的结肠评估,从而减少了频繁检查的需要。然而,这种方法有明显的局限性。结肠镜检查是一种侵入性手术,其并发症罕见但严重,如穿孔和出血。参与率往往低于非侵入性方法,如粪便免疫化学测试。此外,将结肠镜检查作为一种基于人群的工具来实施需要大量的资源,包括训练有素的内窥镜医生、内窥镜检查设备和财政投资。结肠镜检查的质量也可能因操作人员的技能和对指南的遵守而有所不同。考虑到这些权衡,必须仔细评估基于人群的结肠镜筛查的成本效益、可行性和每个国家医疗保健系统的公众接受度。因此,在进行基于人群的结肠镜筛查时,应平衡地了解其益处和局限性,以确保成本效益、可行性、与每个国家的医疗基础设施保持一致,并与现有筛查计划相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intestinal Research
Intestinal Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.20%
发文量
69
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Intestinal Research (Intest Res) is the joint official publication of the Asian Organization for Crohn''s and Colitis (AOCC), Chinese Society of IBD (CSIBD), Japanese Society for IBD (JSIBD), Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID), Taiwan Society of IBD (TSIBD) and Colitis Crohn''s Foundation (India) (CCF, india). The aim of the Journal is to provide broad and in-depth analysis of intestinal diseases, especially inflammatory bowel disease, which shows increasing tendency and significance. As a Journal specialized in clinical and translational research in gastroenterology, it encompasses multiple aspects of diseases originated from the small and large intestines. The Journal also seeks to propagate and exchange useful innovations, both in ideas and in practice, within the research community. As a mode of scholarly communication, it encourages scientific investigation through the rigorous peer-review system and constitutes a qualified and continual platform for sharing studies of researchers and practitioners. Specifically, the Journal presents up-to-date coverage of medical researches on the physiology, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic interventions of the intestinal diseases. General topics of interest include inflammatory bowel disease, colon and small intestine cancer or polyp, endoscopy, irritable bowel syndrome and other motility disorders, infectious enterocolitis, intestinal tuberculosis, and so forth. The Journal publishes diverse types of academic materials such as editorials, clinical and basic reviews, original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, brief communications, perspective, statement or commentary, and images that are useful to clinicians and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书