Patient Satisfaction in Primary Healthcare Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Peruvian Amazon.

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2025-12-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329251405984
Wendy Ramos-Huanca, Cesar Copaja-Corzo, Guimel Palomino-Guerra, Rodrigo Vargas-Joaquin, Tomás N Santana-Téllez, Edgar Parihuana-Travezaño, Orietta M Barriga-Soto, Renza L Gambetta-Quelopana
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction in Primary Healthcare Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Peruvian Amazon.","authors":"Wendy Ramos-Huanca, Cesar Copaja-Corzo, Guimel Palomino-Guerra, Rodrigo Vargas-Joaquin, Tomás N Santana-Téllez, Edgar Parihuana-Travezaño, Orietta M Barriga-Soto, Renza L Gambetta-Quelopana","doi":"10.1177/11786329251405984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluating user satisfaction and its associated factors in two primary healthcare centers in Ucayali, Peru.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was cross-sectional analytical study conducted in April 2025 among patients who received care at two primary healthcare centers located in Ucayali, Peru. To assess their satisfaction with the care received, we used the Ambulatory Medical Consultation Satisfaction Scale (ESCOMA). To identify the factors associated with the ESCOMA satisfaction score, we used linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 465 patients were included; 66.5% of those surveyed were women, and the median age was 40 years (IQR 31-52). Of these, 74.8% lived in the same city as the healthcare center. The median ESCOMA score was 7 points (range 6.17-8.28). Medical care received the highest dimensional score (mean: 7.94 ± 1.5), while facility infrastructure recorded the lowest (mean: 6.37 ± 1.9). The questions with the highest and lowest scores were \"How would you rate this facility regarding the treatment by medical staff?\" (mean: 8.33, SD ± 1.7) and \"How would you rate this facility regarding the equipment?\" (mean: 5.71, SD ± 2.7), respectively. Age ⩾ 47 years (β = .34; 95% CI: 0.02-0.67) was the main factor associated with a higher ESCOMA satisfaction score; on the other hand, patients who lived 2 hours from the health center had lower satisfaction (β = -.68; 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>User satisfaction with primary healthcare centers in Ucayali is favorable regarding medical care and staff treatment. However, perception is significantly lower concerning infrastructure and equipment availability. As the distance from homes to the health centers increases, satisfaction with medical care decreases. These findings highlight the need to improve physical conditions and equipment to optimize the quality of care in these institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251405984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12717362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251405984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluating user satisfaction and its associated factors in two primary healthcare centers in Ucayali, Peru.

Methods: The study was cross-sectional analytical study conducted in April 2025 among patients who received care at two primary healthcare centers located in Ucayali, Peru. To assess their satisfaction with the care received, we used the Ambulatory Medical Consultation Satisfaction Scale (ESCOMA). To identify the factors associated with the ESCOMA satisfaction score, we used linear regression models.

Results: A total of 465 patients were included; 66.5% of those surveyed were women, and the median age was 40 years (IQR 31-52). Of these, 74.8% lived in the same city as the healthcare center. The median ESCOMA score was 7 points (range 6.17-8.28). Medical care received the highest dimensional score (mean: 7.94 ± 1.5), while facility infrastructure recorded the lowest (mean: 6.37 ± 1.9). The questions with the highest and lowest scores were "How would you rate this facility regarding the treatment by medical staff?" (mean: 8.33, SD ± 1.7) and "How would you rate this facility regarding the equipment?" (mean: 5.71, SD ± 2.7), respectively. Age ⩾ 47 years (β = .34; 95% CI: 0.02-0.67) was the main factor associated with a higher ESCOMA satisfaction score; on the other hand, patients who lived 2 hours from the health center had lower satisfaction (β = -.68; 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.28).

Conclusion: User satisfaction with primary healthcare centers in Ucayali is favorable regarding medical care and staff treatment. However, perception is significantly lower concerning infrastructure and equipment availability. As the distance from homes to the health centers increases, satisfaction with medical care decreases. These findings highlight the need to improve physical conditions and equipment to optimize the quality of care in these institutions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

初级卫生保健中心的患者满意度:秘鲁亚马逊地区的横断面研究
目的:评价秘鲁乌卡亚利两个初级卫生保健中心的用户满意度及其相关因素。方法:该研究是一项横断面分析研究,于2025年4月在秘鲁乌卡亚利的两个初级卫生保健中心接受治疗的患者中进行。为了评估他们对所接受护理的满意度,我们使用了门诊医疗咨询满意度量表(ESCOMA)。为了确定与ESCOMA满意度得分相关的因素,我们使用线性回归模型。结果:共纳入465例患者;66.5%的被调查者为女性,年龄中位数为40岁(IQR 31-52)。其中,74.8%的人与医疗中心住在同一个城市。ESCOMA评分中位数为7分(范围6.17-8.28)。医疗服务维度得分最高(平均:7.94±1.5),设施基础设施维度得分最低(平均:6.37±1.9)。得分最高和最低的问题是“你如何评价这家机构的医务人员的治疗?”(平均值:8.33,标准差±1.7)和“您如何评价该设施的设备?”(平均:5.71,SD±2.7)。年龄大于或等于47岁(β = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.02-0.67)是与较高的ESCOMA满意度评分相关的主要因素;另一方面,距离医疗中心2小时路程的患者满意度较低(β = - 0.68; 95% CI: -1.09 ~ -0.28)。结论:乌卡亚利市初级卫生保健中心在医疗服务和工作人员待遇方面,用户满意度较高。然而,对基础设施和设备可用性的看法明显较低。随着从家到保健中心的距离增加,对医疗保健的满意度降低。这些发现强调需要改善这些机构的物理条件和设备,以优化护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书