The Internal Otic Region of Oromerycids (Artiodactyla, Oromerycidae), Early Camelids (Artiodactyla, Camelidae), and the Vicuña (Artiodactyla, Camelidae), Including Notes on Intraspecific and Subadult Ontogenetic Variation.

IF 2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Integrative Organismal Biology Pub Date : 2025-11-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/iob/obaf043
S V Robson, A Prokop, C N Baird, J A Ludtke, S T Tucker, J M Theodor
{"title":"The Internal Otic Region of Oromerycids (Artiodactyla, Oromerycidae), Early Camelids (Artiodactyla, Camelidae), and the Vicuña (Artiodactyla, Camelidae), Including Notes on Intraspecific and Subadult Ontogenetic Variation.","authors":"S V Robson, A Prokop, C N Baird, J A Ludtke, S T Tucker, J M Theodor","doi":"10.1093/iob/obaf043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The taxonomic composition of the suborder Tylopoda is an ongoing debate. Recently, the internal otic region (petrosal and bony labyrinth) has been intensively studied as a source of additional morphological data, but the morphology of this region in extinct tylopods is not well documented. To remedy this, we used µCT scanning to image and describe the petrosal and bony labyrinth of two oromerycids (<i>Protylopus, Eotylopus</i>), four early camelids (<i>Poebrotherium wilsoni, Poebrotherium eximium, Paratylopus primaevus, Stevenscamelus franki</i>), and the living vicuña (<i>Vicugna vicugna</i>). Several early camelid specimens also preserved the ear ossicles (malleus, incus, stapes), enabling us to describe their morphology for the first time. Our sample allows us to not only compare among taxa, but to also examine variation within taxa and during ontogeny. We found that the morphology of the petrosal is far more variable than that of the bony labyrinth, both within and across taxa. There is no notable ontogenetic variation between the juveniles and adults in our sample. <i>Protylopus</i> has an unusual petrosal morphology, and its bony labyrinth is somewhat reminiscent of early dichobunoid artiodactyls. Conversely, <i>Eotylopus</i> has a transitional morphology that seemingly links it to camelids. <i>Poebrotherium wilsoni</i> and <i>Po. eximium</i> do not noticeably differ in their morphology, but there are identifiable differences in <i>Pa. primaevus</i> and <i>S. franki</i>, suggesting that the petrosal of camelids is diagnostic at a genus level. The early camelids were distinct from the vicuña in petrosal, bony labyrinth, and ossicular chain morphology, highlighting the importance of examining basally branching members to resolve evolutionary relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":13666,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Organismal Biology","volume":"7 1","pages":"obaf043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12713648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Organismal Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obaf043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The taxonomic composition of the suborder Tylopoda is an ongoing debate. Recently, the internal otic region (petrosal and bony labyrinth) has been intensively studied as a source of additional morphological data, but the morphology of this region in extinct tylopods is not well documented. To remedy this, we used µCT scanning to image and describe the petrosal and bony labyrinth of two oromerycids (Protylopus, Eotylopus), four early camelids (Poebrotherium wilsoni, Poebrotherium eximium, Paratylopus primaevus, Stevenscamelus franki), and the living vicuña (Vicugna vicugna). Several early camelid specimens also preserved the ear ossicles (malleus, incus, stapes), enabling us to describe their morphology for the first time. Our sample allows us to not only compare among taxa, but to also examine variation within taxa and during ontogeny. We found that the morphology of the petrosal is far more variable than that of the bony labyrinth, both within and across taxa. There is no notable ontogenetic variation between the juveniles and adults in our sample. Protylopus has an unusual petrosal morphology, and its bony labyrinth is somewhat reminiscent of early dichobunoid artiodactyls. Conversely, Eotylopus has a transitional morphology that seemingly links it to camelids. Poebrotherium wilsoni and Po. eximium do not noticeably differ in their morphology, but there are identifiable differences in Pa. primaevus and S. franki, suggesting that the petrosal of camelids is diagnostic at a genus level. The early camelids were distinct from the vicuña in petrosal, bony labyrinth, and ossicular chain morphology, highlighting the importance of examining basally branching members to resolve evolutionary relationships.

金刚猴属(偶蹄目,金刚猴科)、早期骆驼属(偶蹄目,Camelidae)和Vicuña(偶蹄目,Camelidae)的内耳区,包括种内和亚成虫个体发育变异的注释。
趾足亚目的分类组成一直是一个争论不休的问题。最近,内部耳区(岩质和骨迷路)作为额外形态学数据的来源得到了深入的研究,但该区域在已灭绝的类脚类动物中的形态学并没有很好的记录。为了解决这个问题,我们使用微CT扫描成像和描述了2种oromeryids (protoylopus, Eotylopus), 4种早期骆驼科(Poebrotherium wilsoni, Poebrotherium eximium, Paratylopus primaevus, Stevenscamelus franki)和活的vicuña (Vicugna Vicugna)的岩石和骨迷路。一些早期的骆驼标本也保留了耳听骨(踝、砧骨、镫骨),使我们能够第一次描述它们的形态。我们的样本不仅可以让我们在分类群之间进行比较,还可以检查分类群内部和个体发生过程中的变异。我们发现岩石的形态比骨迷宫的形态变化更大,无论是在分类群内部还是在分类群之间。在我们的样本中,幼鱼和成鱼之间没有显著的个体发生差异。原龙具有不寻常的岩状形态,其骨迷宫有点像早期的双爪类偶蹄动物。相反,原始兽的过渡形态似乎将其与骆驼类动物联系起来。威尔逊兄弟和阿宝。它们在形态上没有明显的差异,但在Pa中有可识别的差异。这表明骆驼科的岩栖在属水平上具有诊断性。早期的骆驼科动物在岩石、骨迷路和听骨链形态上与vicuña不同,这突出了研究基本分支成员以解决进化关系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书