Retrospective validation study of a large language model approach to screening for intraabdominal surgical site infections for quality and safety reporting.

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Logan Pierce, Christy Pak, Kim Stanley, Lusha Wang, Caroline Erickson, Deborah S Yokoe, Elizabeth Wick
{"title":"Retrospective validation study of a large language model approach to screening for intraabdominal surgical site infections for quality and safety reporting.","authors":"Logan Pierce, Christy Pak, Kim Stanley, Lusha Wang, Caroline Erickson, Deborah S Yokoe, Elizabeth Wick","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical site infections (SSIs), particularly intra-abdominal (IAB) infections, are challenging to identify and remain a resource-intensive focus of infection prevention programmes. Current automated screening measures rely on discrete data from the electronic health record (EHR), such as microbiology results, diagnosis codes and/or return to the operating room. This approach has poor specificity, and therefore surveillance methods depend heavily on additional manual chart review by trained infection preventionists. Large language models (LLMs) offer an opportunity to improve surveillance by synthesising complex clinical documentation alongside structured data elements.We evaluated the performance of a locally hosted LLM (gpt-35-turbo-16k) to improve IAB SSI screening using perioperative clinical notes and microbiology results. The model analysed documentation across the perioperative period (3 days before through 30 days after surgery) to generate case-level SSI summaries and likelihood assessments. We compared the performance of this tool against the current EHR-based screening workflow.Among 1977 abdominal surgical cases, including 56 with confirmed IAB SSIs, the LLM screened 104 cases as high risk, identifying all infections (negative predictive value (NPV) 100%) and achieving a positive predictive value (PPV) of 53.8%. In contrast, the EHR-based workflow identified 288 cases for further review, with a PPV of only 19.4% and the same NPV of 100%. Analysis of 57 224 notes required ~107 million tokens, translating to approximately USD 0.05 per case.An LLM-based approach to SSI surveillance has the potential to substantially improve efficiency while remaining highly accurate and cost-effective. By reducing reliance on manual chart review, this strategy could allow infection preventionists to shift their attention from surveillance toward quality improvement and patient safety initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"424-427"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019493","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSIs), particularly intra-abdominal (IAB) infections, are challenging to identify and remain a resource-intensive focus of infection prevention programmes. Current automated screening measures rely on discrete data from the electronic health record (EHR), such as microbiology results, diagnosis codes and/or return to the operating room. This approach has poor specificity, and therefore surveillance methods depend heavily on additional manual chart review by trained infection preventionists. Large language models (LLMs) offer an opportunity to improve surveillance by synthesising complex clinical documentation alongside structured data elements.We evaluated the performance of a locally hosted LLM (gpt-35-turbo-16k) to improve IAB SSI screening using perioperative clinical notes and microbiology results. The model analysed documentation across the perioperative period (3 days before through 30 days after surgery) to generate case-level SSI summaries and likelihood assessments. We compared the performance of this tool against the current EHR-based screening workflow.Among 1977 abdominal surgical cases, including 56 with confirmed IAB SSIs, the LLM screened 104 cases as high risk, identifying all infections (negative predictive value (NPV) 100%) and achieving a positive predictive value (PPV) of 53.8%. In contrast, the EHR-based workflow identified 288 cases for further review, with a PPV of only 19.4% and the same NPV of 100%. Analysis of 57 224 notes required ~107 million tokens, translating to approximately USD 0.05 per case.An LLM-based approach to SSI surveillance has the potential to substantially improve efficiency while remaining highly accurate and cost-effective. By reducing reliance on manual chart review, this strategy could allow infection preventionists to shift their attention from surveillance toward quality improvement and patient safety initiatives.

大语言模型方法筛选腹内手术部位感染的质量和安全性报告的回顾性验证研究。
手术部位感染(ssi),特别是腹腔内感染(IAB),是识别具有挑战性的,并且仍然是感染预防规划的资源密集型重点。目前的自动筛查措施依赖于来自电子健康记录(EHR)的离散数据,如微生物学结果、诊断代码和/或返回手术室。这种方法的特异性较差,因此监测方法在很大程度上依赖于训练有素的感染预防学家额外的手工图表审查。大型语言模型(llm)提供了一个机会,通过综合复杂的临床文件和结构化数据元素来改善监测。我们评估了本地托管LLM (gpt-35-turbo-16k)的性能,以改善IAB SSI筛查,并使用围手术期临床记录和微生物学结果。该模型分析了围手术期(术前3天至术后30天)的文献,以生成病例级SSI总结和可能性评估。我们将该工具的性能与当前基于ehr的筛选工作流程进行了比较。在1977例腹部手术病例中,包括56例确诊为IAB ssi的病例,LLM筛选了104例高危病例,识别出所有感染(阴性预测值(NPV) 100%),阳性预测值(PPV)为53.8%。相比之下,基于电子病历的工作流程确定了288例病例进行进一步审查,PPV仅为19.4%,NPV为100%。对57 224张纸币的分析需要约1.07亿代币,折合每份约0.05美元。基于llm的SSI监测方法有可能大幅提高效率,同时保持高度准确和成本效益。通过减少对手动图表审查的依赖,该策略可以使感染预防学家将注意力从监测转移到质量改进和患者安全举措上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书