Faria Shahid, Muhammad Adeel Razzaq, Ayesha Sajid, Yasameen Hameed Jasim, Salam Adil Ahmed, Muhammad Umair, Awais Ali, Aida Albadawy, Hazem Golshany, Zakir Hidayatallah
{"title":"Chemical Characterization and Comparative Biological Activities of <i>Spinacia oleracea</i> and <i>Basella rubra</i> Leaf Extracts.","authors":"Faria Shahid, Muhammad Adeel Razzaq, Ayesha Sajid, Yasameen Hameed Jasim, Salam Adil Ahmed, Muhammad Umair, Awais Ali, Aida Albadawy, Hazem Golshany, Zakir Hidayatallah","doi":"10.1155/bri/7140041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the in vitro <b>biological activities</b> of aqueous leaf extracts from <i>Spinacia oleracea</i> and <i>Basella rubra</i>. Extraction was performed using the maceration method, yielding 25% and 14%, respectively. Phytochemical analysis revealed that <i>S. oleracea</i> had higher total phenolic content (6.2 ± 0.4 mg GAE/g) and flavonoid content (3.8 ± 0.3 mg CE/g) compared to <i>B. rubra</i>. Conversely, <i>B. rubra</i> exhibited stronger antioxidant activity with 79.6% DPPH inhibition versus 64.2% in <i>S. oleracea</i>. In the α-amylase inhibition assay, <i>B. rubra</i> again showed higher enzyme inhibition (72.3%) compared to <i>S. oleracea</i> (51.1%), indicating greater antidiabetic potential. Both extracts displayed <b>no antibacterial activity</b> against <i>E. coli</i> and <i>S. aureus</i>. Hemolysis assays indicated low cytotoxicity: 8.1% for <i>S. oleracea</i> and 5.4% for <i>B. rubra</i>. FTIR analysis identified bioactive functional groups, including phenols, carboxylic acids, glycosides, esters, and alkanes. These findings suggest that both plants possess antioxidant and enzyme-inhibitory potential, warranting further in vivo and phytochemical investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8826,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry Research International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7140041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12717431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/bri/7140041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the in vitro biological activities of aqueous leaf extracts from Spinacia oleracea and Basella rubra. Extraction was performed using the maceration method, yielding 25% and 14%, respectively. Phytochemical analysis revealed that S. oleracea had higher total phenolic content (6.2 ± 0.4 mg GAE/g) and flavonoid content (3.8 ± 0.3 mg CE/g) compared to B. rubra. Conversely, B. rubra exhibited stronger antioxidant activity with 79.6% DPPH inhibition versus 64.2% in S. oleracea. In the α-amylase inhibition assay, B. rubra again showed higher enzyme inhibition (72.3%) compared to S. oleracea (51.1%), indicating greater antidiabetic potential. Both extracts displayed no antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus. Hemolysis assays indicated low cytotoxicity: 8.1% for S. oleracea and 5.4% for B. rubra. FTIR analysis identified bioactive functional groups, including phenols, carboxylic acids, glycosides, esters, and alkanes. These findings suggest that both plants possess antioxidant and enzyme-inhibitory potential, warranting further in vivo and phytochemical investigations.