Chemical Characterization and Comparative Biological Activities of Spinacia oleracea and Basella rubra Leaf Extracts.

IF 2.9 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Biochemistry Research International Pub Date : 2025-12-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/bri/7140041
Faria Shahid, Muhammad Adeel Razzaq, Ayesha Sajid, Yasameen Hameed Jasim, Salam Adil Ahmed, Muhammad Umair, Awais Ali, Aida Albadawy, Hazem Golshany, Zakir Hidayatallah
{"title":"Chemical Characterization and Comparative Biological Activities of <i>Spinacia oleracea</i> and <i>Basella rubra</i> Leaf Extracts.","authors":"Faria Shahid, Muhammad Adeel Razzaq, Ayesha Sajid, Yasameen Hameed Jasim, Salam Adil Ahmed, Muhammad Umair, Awais Ali, Aida Albadawy, Hazem Golshany, Zakir Hidayatallah","doi":"10.1155/bri/7140041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the in vitro <b>biological activities</b> of aqueous leaf extracts from <i>Spinacia oleracea</i> and <i>Basella rubra</i>. Extraction was performed using the maceration method, yielding 25% and 14%, respectively. Phytochemical analysis revealed that <i>S. oleracea</i> had higher total phenolic content (6.2 ± 0.4 mg GAE/g) and flavonoid content (3.8 ± 0.3 mg CE/g) compared to <i>B. rubra</i>. Conversely, <i>B. rubra</i> exhibited stronger antioxidant activity with 79.6% DPPH inhibition versus 64.2% in <i>S. oleracea</i>. In the α-amylase inhibition assay, <i>B. rubra</i> again showed higher enzyme inhibition (72.3%) compared to <i>S. oleracea</i> (51.1%), indicating greater antidiabetic potential. Both extracts displayed <b>no antibacterial activity</b> against <i>E. coli</i> and <i>S. aureus</i>. Hemolysis assays indicated low cytotoxicity: 8.1% for <i>S. oleracea</i> and 5.4% for <i>B. rubra</i>. FTIR analysis identified bioactive functional groups, including phenols, carboxylic acids, glycosides, esters, and alkanes. These findings suggest that both plants possess antioxidant and enzyme-inhibitory potential, warranting further in vivo and phytochemical investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8826,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry Research International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7140041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12717431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/bri/7140041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the in vitro biological activities of aqueous leaf extracts from Spinacia oleracea and Basella rubra. Extraction was performed using the maceration method, yielding 25% and 14%, respectively. Phytochemical analysis revealed that S. oleracea had higher total phenolic content (6.2 ± 0.4 mg GAE/g) and flavonoid content (3.8 ± 0.3 mg CE/g) compared to B. rubra. Conversely, B. rubra exhibited stronger antioxidant activity with 79.6% DPPH inhibition versus 64.2% in S. oleracea. In the α-amylase inhibition assay, B. rubra again showed higher enzyme inhibition (72.3%) compared to S. oleracea (51.1%), indicating greater antidiabetic potential. Both extracts displayed no antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus. Hemolysis assays indicated low cytotoxicity: 8.1% for S. oleracea and 5.4% for B. rubra. FTIR analysis identified bioactive functional groups, including phenols, carboxylic acids, glycosides, esters, and alkanes. These findings suggest that both plants possess antioxidant and enzyme-inhibitory potential, warranting further in vivo and phytochemical investigations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

马齿苋和红底草叶提取物的化学特性及比较生物学活性研究。
本研究旨在比较菠菜叶水提液和红底草叶水提液的体外生物活性。采用浸渍法提取,提取率分别为25%和14%。植物化学分析表明,甘蓝总酚含量(6.2±0.4 mg GAE/g)和类黄酮含量(3.8±0.3 mg CE/g)高于红草。相反,红草对DPPH的抑制率为79.6%,而马齿苋对DPPH的抑制率为64.2%。在α-淀粉酶抑制实验中,红毛茛的α-淀粉酶抑制率为72.3%,高于甘蓝(51.1%),显示出更强的降糖潜力。两种提取物对大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌均无抑菌活性。溶血试验表明,马齿苋的细胞毒性较低,为8.1%,红草为5.4%。FTIR分析鉴定出生物活性官能团,包括酚类、羧酸类、糖苷类、酯类和烷烃。这些发现表明,这两种植物都具有抗氧化和酶抑制的潜力,需要进一步的体内和植物化学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biochemistry Research International
Biochemistry Research International BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书