Wei Zhang, Shirui Qin, Lu Hou, Wenbo Zhang, Bofei Liu, Yingwei Wu, Kun Zhang, Fan Liu, Shiyu Wu, Fukui Huan, Wenyang Liu
{"title":"A comparative analysis of setup accuracy between 6D and 3D treatment couches in radiotherapy for lung cancer with brain metastases","authors":"Wei Zhang, Shirui Qin, Lu Hou, Wenbo Zhang, Bofei Liu, Yingwei Wu, Kun Zhang, Fan Liu, Shiyu Wu, Fukui Huan, Wenyang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2025.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy of six-dimensional (6D) treatment couches in minimizing setup errors compared with three-dimensional (3D) treatment couches during radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 lung cancer patients with brain metastases who received stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the availability of treatment units at the time of planning: 20 patients were treated using a 3D couch, and 20 patients with a 6D couch. Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) registration was used to measure residual setup errors in the <em>x</em>, <em>y</em>, and <em>z</em> axes at two key cranial anatomical landmarks, specifically the internal acoustic meatus (IAM) and crista galli (CG), for both groups. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to assess the normality of the data, and the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test was performed to determine statistical differences between the two groups, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline data indicated that the two groups were well-balanced in terms of gender, age, and distribution of pathological types, number of brain metastases, maximum metastases volume, and relative distance between metastases and isocenter (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Setup error data in all directions (IAM_<em>x</em>/<em>y</em>/<em>z</em>, CG_<em>x</em>/<em>y</em>/<em>z</em>) did not follow a normal distribution (<em>P</em> < 0.05). The Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test revealed that setup errors in the 6D group were significantly smaller than those in the 3D group across all directions (IAM_<em>x</em>/<em>y</em>/<em>z</em>, CG_<em>x</em>/<em>y</em>/<em>z</em>, all <em>P</em> < 0.001). The mean error reduction exceeded 1 mm in all directions, with the most significant difference observed in the CG_X direction: 2.2 (1.3, 3.3) mm in the 3D group versus 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) mm in the 6D group, representing a difference of 1.9 mm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The six-dimensional (6D) treatment couch effectively minimizes residual setup errors, especially rotational ones, in radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 332-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555725001467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the accuracy of six-dimensional (6D) treatment couches in minimizing setup errors compared with three-dimensional (3D) treatment couches during radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 lung cancer patients with brain metastases who received stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the availability of treatment units at the time of planning: 20 patients were treated using a 3D couch, and 20 patients with a 6D couch. Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) registration was used to measure residual setup errors in the x, y, and z axes at two key cranial anatomical landmarks, specifically the internal acoustic meatus (IAM) and crista galli (CG), for both groups. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to assess the normality of the data, and the Mann-Whitney U test was performed to determine statistical differences between the two groups, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Results
Baseline data indicated that the two groups were well-balanced in terms of gender, age, and distribution of pathological types, number of brain metastases, maximum metastases volume, and relative distance between metastases and isocenter (P > 0.05). Setup error data in all directions (IAM_x/y/z, CG_x/y/z) did not follow a normal distribution (P < 0.05). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed that setup errors in the 6D group were significantly smaller than those in the 3D group across all directions (IAM_x/y/z, CG_x/y/z, all P < 0.001). The mean error reduction exceeded 1 mm in all directions, with the most significant difference observed in the CG_X direction: 2.2 (1.3, 3.3) mm in the 3D group versus 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) mm in the 6D group, representing a difference of 1.9 mm.
Conclusion
The six-dimensional (6D) treatment couch effectively minimizes residual setup errors, especially rotational ones, in radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases.