A comparative analysis of setup accuracy between 6D and 3D treatment couches in radiotherapy for lung cancer with brain metastases

Q1 Health Professions
Radiation Medicine and Protection Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.radmp.2025.11.004
Wei Zhang, Shirui Qin, Lu Hou, Wenbo Zhang, Bofei Liu, Yingwei Wu, Kun Zhang, Fan Liu, Shiyu Wu, Fukui Huan, Wenyang Liu
{"title":"A comparative analysis of setup accuracy between 6D and 3D treatment couches in radiotherapy for lung cancer with brain metastases","authors":"Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Shirui Qin,&nbsp;Lu Hou,&nbsp;Wenbo Zhang,&nbsp;Bofei Liu,&nbsp;Yingwei Wu,&nbsp;Kun Zhang,&nbsp;Fan Liu,&nbsp;Shiyu Wu,&nbsp;Fukui Huan,&nbsp;Wenyang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2025.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy of six-dimensional (6D) treatment couches in minimizing setup errors compared with three-dimensional (3D) treatment couches during radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 lung cancer patients with brain metastases who received stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the availability of treatment units at the time of planning: 20 patients were treated using a 3D couch, and 20 patients with a 6D couch. Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) registration was used to measure residual setup errors in the <em>x</em>, <em>y</em>, and <em>z</em> axes at two key cranial anatomical landmarks, specifically the internal acoustic meatus (IAM) and crista galli (CG), for both groups. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to assess the normality of the data, and the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test was performed to determine statistical differences between the two groups, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline data indicated that the two groups were well-balanced in terms of gender, age, and distribution of pathological types, number of brain metastases, maximum metastases volume, and relative distance between metastases and isocenter (<em>P</em> ​&gt; ​0.05). Setup error data in all directions (IAM_<em>x</em>/<em>y</em>/<em>z</em>, CG_<em>x</em>/<em>y</em>/<em>z</em>) did not follow a normal distribution (<em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). The Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test revealed that setup errors in the 6D group were significantly smaller than those in the 3D group across all directions (IAM_<em>x</em>/<em>y</em>/<em>z</em>, CG_<em>x</em>/<em>y</em>/<em>z</em>, all <em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.001). The mean error reduction exceeded 1 ​mm in all directions, with the most significant difference observed in the CG_X direction: 2.2 (1.3, 3.3) mm in the 3D group versus 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) mm in the 6D group, representing a difference of 1.9 ​mm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The six-dimensional (6D) treatment couch effectively minimizes residual setup errors, especially rotational ones, in radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 332-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555725001467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of six-dimensional (6D) treatment couches in minimizing setup errors compared with three-dimensional (3D) treatment couches during radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 lung cancer patients with brain metastases who received stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the availability of treatment units at the time of planning: 20 patients were treated using a 3D couch, and 20 patients with a 6D couch. Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) registration was used to measure residual setup errors in the x, y, and z axes at two key cranial anatomical landmarks, specifically the internal acoustic meatus (IAM) and crista galli (CG), for both groups. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to assess the normality of the data, and the Mann-Whitney U test was performed to determine statistical differences between the two groups, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

Results

Baseline data indicated that the two groups were well-balanced in terms of gender, age, and distribution of pathological types, number of brain metastases, maximum metastases volume, and relative distance between metastases and isocenter (P ​> ​0.05). Setup error data in all directions (IAM_x/y/z, CG_x/y/z) did not follow a normal distribution (P ​< ​0.05). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed that setup errors in the 6D group were significantly smaller than those in the 3D group across all directions (IAM_x/y/z, CG_x/y/z, all P ​< ​0.001). The mean error reduction exceeded 1 ​mm in all directions, with the most significant difference observed in the CG_X direction: 2.2 (1.3, 3.3) mm in the 3D group versus 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) mm in the 6D group, representing a difference of 1.9 ​mm.

Conclusion

The six-dimensional (6D) treatment couch effectively minimizes residual setup errors, especially rotational ones, in radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases.
肺癌脑转移放疗中6D与3D治疗仪设置精度的比较分析
目的评价六维(6D)治疗躺椅与三维(3D)治疗躺椅在肺癌脑转移患者放疗中减少设置误差的准确性。方法回顾性分析40例接受立体定向放疗(SRS/SRT)治疗的肺癌脑转移患者的临床资料。根据计划时治疗单位的可用性将队列分为两组:20名患者使用3D沙发治疗,20名患者使用6D沙发治疗。每日锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)配准用于测量两组在两个关键颅骨解剖标志,特别是内声道(IAM)和冠状嵴(CG)上x、y和z轴的残余设置误差。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验评估数据的正态性,采用Mann-Whitney U检验确定两组间的统计学差异,多组比较采用Bonferroni校正。结果基线资料显示,两组患者在性别、年龄、病理类型分布、脑转移数量、最大转移体积、转移灶与等中心的相对距离等方面均比较均衡(P > 0.05)。各方向(IAM_x/y/z, CG_x/y/z)的设置误差数据不服从正态分布(P < 0.05)。Mann-Whitney U检验显示,6D组的设置误差在所有方向上都明显小于3D组(IAM_x/y/z, CG_x/y/z,所有P <; 0.001)。所有方向的平均误差减小均超过1 mm,其中CG_X方向的误差减小最为显著:3D组为2.2 (1.3,3.3)mm, 6D组为0.3 (0.2,0.5)mm,差异为1.9 mm。结论六维(6D)治疗床可有效减少肺癌脑转移患者放射治疗中的残留设置误差,特别是旋转设置误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书