Sustainable mortar production using volcanic ash and crushed laterite as partial cement replacements

CEMENT Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.cement.2025.100162
Bahiru Bewket Mitikie , Demelash Leyekun Kebede , Walied A. Elsaigh
{"title":"Sustainable mortar production using volcanic ash and crushed laterite as partial cement replacements","authors":"Bahiru Bewket Mitikie ,&nbsp;Demelash Leyekun Kebede ,&nbsp;Walied A. Elsaigh","doi":"10.1016/j.cement.2025.100162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cement is a critical construction material globally and particularly in Ethiopia, where its production is energy-intensive, costly, and a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. This study explores the partial replacement of Portland cement with volcanic ash and crushed laterite powder in cement mortar as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative. Preliminary mix designs were prepared with varying proportions of volcanic ash and laterite powder to determine optimal combinations which is equal percentage of volcanic ash and laterite powder as selected based the compressive strength result. Subsequent experimental mixes replaced cement with equal proportion of volcanic ash and laterite soil at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% by weight, following ASTM C109 standards. The study assessed characterization, mechanical (compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity), durability (sulfate resistance, porosity, and water absorption), and microstructural properties using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential thermal analysis (DTA) analyses. Characterization results showed that volcanic ash and crushed laterite are finer than cement and are predominantly pozzolanic. Bernauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis confirmed their fine particle sizes, contributing to the dense packing of the mortar. At 10% of replacement of cement by equal amount of volcanic ash and laterite soil, the highest compressive strength was recorded 33.1 MPa at 28 days and 46.2 MPa at 56 days. Water absorption decreased with increasing the replacement percentage up to 15%, indicating improved durability. Microstructural analysis revealed a denser morphology due to secondary C-S-H formation and filler effects. Overall, volcanic ash and laterite powder improved both mechanical and durability properties of mortar up to 15% replacement, with optimal performance at 10%. This shows the potential of those pozzolanic as a viable partial cement substitute, promoting sustainable construction practices in Ethiopia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100225,"journal":{"name":"CEMENT","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666549225000350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cement is a critical construction material globally and particularly in Ethiopia, where its production is energy-intensive, costly, and a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. This study explores the partial replacement of Portland cement with volcanic ash and crushed laterite powder in cement mortar as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative. Preliminary mix designs were prepared with varying proportions of volcanic ash and laterite powder to determine optimal combinations which is equal percentage of volcanic ash and laterite powder as selected based the compressive strength result. Subsequent experimental mixes replaced cement with equal proportion of volcanic ash and laterite soil at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% by weight, following ASTM C109 standards. The study assessed characterization, mechanical (compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity), durability (sulfate resistance, porosity, and water absorption), and microstructural properties using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential thermal analysis (DTA) analyses. Characterization results showed that volcanic ash and crushed laterite are finer than cement and are predominantly pozzolanic. Bernauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis confirmed their fine particle sizes, contributing to the dense packing of the mortar. At 10% of replacement of cement by equal amount of volcanic ash and laterite soil, the highest compressive strength was recorded 33.1 MPa at 28 days and 46.2 MPa at 56 days. Water absorption decreased with increasing the replacement percentage up to 15%, indicating improved durability. Microstructural analysis revealed a denser morphology due to secondary C-S-H formation and filler effects. Overall, volcanic ash and laterite powder improved both mechanical and durability properties of mortar up to 15% replacement, with optimal performance at 10%. This shows the potential of those pozzolanic as a viable partial cement substitute, promoting sustainable construction practices in Ethiopia.
使用火山灰和红土碎石作为部分水泥替代品的可持续砂浆生产
水泥在全球范围内都是一种重要的建筑材料,尤其是在埃塞俄比亚,水泥的生产是能源密集型的,成本高昂,也是温室气体排放的主要来源。本研究探讨了火山灰和红土粉在水泥砂浆中的部分替代波特兰水泥,作为一种可持续和经济的替代方案。采用不同比例的火山灰和红土粉进行初步配合比设计,根据抗压强度结果确定火山灰和红土粉配比等的最佳配合比。随后的试验混合物按照ASTM C109标准,用同等比例的火山灰和红土代替水泥,重量分别为0%、5%、10%、15%、20%、25%和30%。该研究利用傅里叶变换红外(FT-IR)、热重分析(TGA)和差热分析(DTA)分析评估了表征、机械(抗压强度和超声脉冲速度)、耐久性(抗硫酸盐、孔隙率和吸水性)和微观结构性能。表征结果表明,火山灰和红土碎屑比水泥细,以火山灰为主。伯瑙尔-埃米特-泰勒(BET)分析证实了它们的细颗粒尺寸,有助于砂浆的致密堆积。等量火山灰和红土替代水泥量为10%时,28天抗压强度最高,为33.1 MPa, 56天抗压强度最高,为46.2 MPa。吸水率随着更换率的增加而下降,最高可达15%,这表明耐久性得到了提高。显微结构分析表明,由于二次C-S-H的形成和填料的作用,其形貌更加致密。总的来说,火山灰和红土粉末可使砂浆的机械性能和耐久性提高15%,最佳性能为10%。这显示了这些火山灰作为一种可行的部分水泥替代品的潜力,促进了埃塞俄比亚的可持续建筑实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书