From waste to worth: How environmental accounting translates sustainability practices into organizational value

IF 3.9
Cleaner Waste Systems Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100456
Mohammad Main Uddin , M. Meherul Islam Khan , Md. Tazul Islam , Md. Asaduzzaman Babu
{"title":"From waste to worth: How environmental accounting translates sustainability practices into organizational value","authors":"Mohammad Main Uddin ,&nbsp;M. Meherul Islam Khan ,&nbsp;Md. Tazul Islam ,&nbsp;Md. Asaduzzaman Babu","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental accounting and reporting address public environmental issues and demonstrate a company's commitment to sustainability, which is highly susceptible to the effects of climate change, especially in Bangladesh. Despite the increasing focus on sustainability reporting, there is a lack of research on the systematic translation of specific environmental management practices into organizational value through environmental accounting and reporting. These practices include solid waste, wastewater, energy, emissions, and monitoring. Accordingly, the study's primary aim is to identify the factors that influence an organization's environmental accounting and reporting and how these factors impact its goodwill, reputation, financial performance, and environmental sustainability. After gathering the data, several discrepancies were identified in the questionnaire, and 400 participants were selected following the data-cleaning process of 450 respondents. The research employed Smart PLS (4.1.0.0) with a PLS-SEM approach. The results support most of the hypothesized relationships. Specifically, SWM has a significant influence on EAR (β = 0.128), as do WWM (β = 0.256), EC (β = 0.568), and EA (β = 0.152). However, the relationship between PIM and EAR was not statistically significant (β = 0.053, p = 0.289), indicating that internal monitoring does not always translate into external environmental disclosures. Likewise, EAR was found to significantly enhance organizational outcomes, as it positively impacts OGR (β = 0.186), OFP (β = 0.139), and OES (β = 0.586). These findings underscore the importance of environmental initiatives and transparent reporting in achieving both reputational and financial benefits, as well as sustainability benefits. This research extends the legitimacy and stakeholder theory by demonstrating how strategic environmental practices and disclosure behaviors converge to enhance corporate performance, particularly in developing country contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100456"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525002544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental accounting and reporting address public environmental issues and demonstrate a company's commitment to sustainability, which is highly susceptible to the effects of climate change, especially in Bangladesh. Despite the increasing focus on sustainability reporting, there is a lack of research on the systematic translation of specific environmental management practices into organizational value through environmental accounting and reporting. These practices include solid waste, wastewater, energy, emissions, and monitoring. Accordingly, the study's primary aim is to identify the factors that influence an organization's environmental accounting and reporting and how these factors impact its goodwill, reputation, financial performance, and environmental sustainability. After gathering the data, several discrepancies were identified in the questionnaire, and 400 participants were selected following the data-cleaning process of 450 respondents. The research employed Smart PLS (4.1.0.0) with a PLS-SEM approach. The results support most of the hypothesized relationships. Specifically, SWM has a significant influence on EAR (β = 0.128), as do WWM (β = 0.256), EC (β = 0.568), and EA (β = 0.152). However, the relationship between PIM and EAR was not statistically significant (β = 0.053, p = 0.289), indicating that internal monitoring does not always translate into external environmental disclosures. Likewise, EAR was found to significantly enhance organizational outcomes, as it positively impacts OGR (β = 0.186), OFP (β = 0.139), and OES (β = 0.586). These findings underscore the importance of environmental initiatives and transparent reporting in achieving both reputational and financial benefits, as well as sustainability benefits. This research extends the legitimacy and stakeholder theory by demonstrating how strategic environmental practices and disclosure behaviors converge to enhance corporate performance, particularly in developing country contexts.
从浪费到价值:环境会计如何将可持续性实践转化为组织价值
环境会计和报告解决公共环境问题,并展示公司对可持续发展的承诺,这极易受到气候变化的影响,特别是在孟加拉国。尽管越来越关注可持续发展报告,但缺乏通过环境会计和报告将具体环境管理实践系统地转化为组织价值的研究。这些做法包括固体废物、废水、能源、排放和监测。因此,本研究的主要目的是确定影响组织环境会计和报告的因素,以及这些因素如何影响其商誉、声誉、财务绩效和环境可持续性。在收集数据后,在问卷中发现了一些差异,并在450名受访者的数据清理过程中选择了400名参与者。本研究采用Smart PLS(4.1.0.0)和PLS- sem方法。研究结果支持了大部分的假设关系。具体而言,SWM对EAR有显著影响(β = 0.128), WWM (β = 0.256)、EC (β = 0.568)和EA (β = 0.152)也有显著影响。然而,PIM和EAR之间的关系并不具有统计学意义(β = 0.053, p = 0.289),这表明内部监测并不总是转化为外部环境披露。同样,我们发现EAR显著提高了组织成果,因为它正影响OGR (β = 0.186)、OFP (β = 0.139)和OES (β = 0.586)。这些发现强调了环境倡议和透明报告在实现声誉和财务效益以及可持续发展效益方面的重要性。本研究扩展了合法性和利益相关者理论,展示了战略环境实践和信息披露行为如何融合以提高公司绩效,特别是在发展中国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书