Artificial lures to reduce bait use in the artisanal Octopus maya fishery of the Campeche Bank, Mexico

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100377
Polo Barajas-Girón , Miguel Á. Gamboa-Álvarez , Daniel Peñalosa-Martinell , Unai Markaida , Saul Pensamiento-Villarauz , José F. Chávez-Villegas , Lorena Rocha-Tejeda , Alesa Flores-Guzmán , Carlos E. Novelo-Villanueva , Francisco J. Vergara-Solana
{"title":"Artificial lures to reduce bait use in the artisanal Octopus maya fishery of the Campeche Bank, Mexico","authors":"Polo Barajas-Girón ,&nbsp;Miguel Á. Gamboa-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Daniel Peñalosa-Martinell ,&nbsp;Unai Markaida ,&nbsp;Saul Pensamiento-Villarauz ,&nbsp;José F. Chávez-Villegas ,&nbsp;Lorena Rocha-Tejeda ,&nbsp;Alesa Flores-Guzmán ,&nbsp;Carlos E. Novelo-Villanueva ,&nbsp;Francisco J. Vergara-Solana","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates artificial lures as a sustainable alternative to natural bait in the small-scale red octopus (<em>Octopus maya</em>) fishery of the Campeche Bank, Mexico. An experiment with 21 fishing trips compared both methods. Lures yielded 26.5 octopuses and 13.7 kg per trip, versus 23.9 octopuses and 12.6 kg with bait. No differences in weight (p = 0.6) or number (p = 0.54) were found, indicating lures are as effective as bait. Based on operational data from three fishing seasons (2021–2023) and interviews with experienced fishers, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of both strategies. Lures are more cost-efficient, mainly due to their reusability. Lure-based operations had an average daily lure cost of 2.12 USD, representing a cost of 0.013USD per kg of octopus. In contrast, bait costs were estimated at USD 31.8 per day per vessel, and USD 0.46 per kg of octopus. Using artificial lures could save approximately half a ton of crabs per vessel, as each vessel typically requires around 6 kg of bait per fishing day over the 90 days commonly fished in a season, thereby significantly reducing fishing pressure on crab populations. Additional benefits of lures include improved hygiene, and no need for refrigeration for bait storing. Although made of plastic, lures contribute to reducing waste by lowering the frequency of line replacement, as bait is often discarded with the tying line. Although potential negative externalities are recognized—requiring monitoring and intervention when justified—lures present a viable solution aligned with broader local fisheries sustainability initiatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100377"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789425001230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates artificial lures as a sustainable alternative to natural bait in the small-scale red octopus (Octopus maya) fishery of the Campeche Bank, Mexico. An experiment with 21 fishing trips compared both methods. Lures yielded 26.5 octopuses and 13.7 kg per trip, versus 23.9 octopuses and 12.6 kg with bait. No differences in weight (p = 0.6) or number (p = 0.54) were found, indicating lures are as effective as bait. Based on operational data from three fishing seasons (2021–2023) and interviews with experienced fishers, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of both strategies. Lures are more cost-efficient, mainly due to their reusability. Lure-based operations had an average daily lure cost of 2.12 USD, representing a cost of 0.013USD per kg of octopus. In contrast, bait costs were estimated at USD 31.8 per day per vessel, and USD 0.46 per kg of octopus. Using artificial lures could save approximately half a ton of crabs per vessel, as each vessel typically requires around 6 kg of bait per fishing day over the 90 days commonly fished in a season, thereby significantly reducing fishing pressure on crab populations. Additional benefits of lures include improved hygiene, and no need for refrigeration for bait storing. Although made of plastic, lures contribute to reducing waste by lowering the frequency of line replacement, as bait is often discarded with the tying line. Although potential negative externalities are recognized—requiring monitoring and intervention when justified—lures present a viable solution aligned with broader local fisheries sustainability initiatives.
在墨西哥坎佩切河岸的手工章鱼玛雅渔业中,人工诱饵减少了诱饵的使用
本研究评估了在墨西哥坎佩切河岸的小型红章鱼渔业中,人工诱饵作为天然诱饵的可持续替代品。一项涉及21次钓鱼的实验比较了这两种方法。鱼饵每次捕获26.5只章鱼,每次捕获13.7公斤,而鱼饵每次捕获23.9只章鱼,每次捕获12.6公斤。鱼饵的重量(p = 0.6)和数量(p = 0.54)均无差异,表明鱼饵的效果与饵料相同。基于三个捕鱼季节(2021-2023)的运营数据和对经验丰富的渔民的访谈,我们估计了这两种策略的成本效益。鱼饵更具成本效益,主要是由于它们的可重用性。诱鱼饵作业的平均日诱鱼饵成本为2.12美元,每公斤章鱼的成本为0.013美元。相比之下,每艘船每天的诱饵成本估计为31.8美元,每公斤章鱼的诱饵成本估计为0.46美元。使用人工诱饵可以为每艘船节省约半吨螃蟹,因为每艘船在一个季节通常捕鱼的90天内,每个捕鱼日通常需要约6公斤诱饵,从而大大减少对螃蟹种群的捕捞压力。鱼饵的其他好处包括改善卫生,不需要冷藏鱼饵储存。虽然鱼饵是塑料制成的,但由于鱼饵经常随系绳一起被丢弃,因此可以降低更换鱼线的频率,从而有助于减少浪费。虽然潜在的负面外部性是公认的,需要在合理的情况下进行监测和干预,但诱饵是与更广泛的当地渔业可持续性倡议相一致的可行解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书