Nature-based health initiatives: A governance assessment tool based on indicators

IF 5.5 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Alessandra Rigo, Laura Secco, Elena Pisani
{"title":"Nature-based health initiatives: A governance assessment tool based on indicators","authors":"Alessandra Rigo,&nbsp;Laura Secco,&nbsp;Elena Pisani","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.101085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature-based health initiatives (NbHIs) are emerging as innovative approaches to promoting human well-being and environmental sustainability. However, a standardised method to evaluate the multi-actor, multi-level, and multi-sector governance required for their implementation is lacking. This study addresses this gap by presenting an evaluation tool empirically tested through a multi-case study involving three NbHIs at different stages of development in North-Eastern Italy. Data were collected through 20 in-depth structured interviews with experts and 27 online questionnaires completed by the initiative participants. A total of 152 governance indicators were derived and hierarchically aggregated into a composite index, designed to capture the multidimensional and context-sensitive nature of NbHI governance, based on a purpose-built conceptual framework. The findings highlight that overall governance performance does not align uniformly across all dimensions and components of the framework. This variability is shaped by governance-related and contextual factors, such as the composition of the actor network and the maturity stage of each initiative. The proposed methodology provides a practical and adaptable tool for monitoring and evaluating the governance of NbHIs, helping to identify strengths and weaknesses and offering guidance for targeted improvements. It enhances understanding of how these initiatives can generate meaningful environmental and health outcomes through stronger cross-sectoral collaboration, providing evidence to support their integration into both health and environmental policy agendas. Finally, the study illustrates the application of the tool by offering case-specific recommendations and actionable insights for practitioners involved in the design and implementation of NbHIs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101085"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725005069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based health initiatives (NbHIs) are emerging as innovative approaches to promoting human well-being and environmental sustainability. However, a standardised method to evaluate the multi-actor, multi-level, and multi-sector governance required for their implementation is lacking. This study addresses this gap by presenting an evaluation tool empirically tested through a multi-case study involving three NbHIs at different stages of development in North-Eastern Italy. Data were collected through 20 in-depth structured interviews with experts and 27 online questionnaires completed by the initiative participants. A total of 152 governance indicators were derived and hierarchically aggregated into a composite index, designed to capture the multidimensional and context-sensitive nature of NbHI governance, based on a purpose-built conceptual framework. The findings highlight that overall governance performance does not align uniformly across all dimensions and components of the framework. This variability is shaped by governance-related and contextual factors, such as the composition of the actor network and the maturity stage of each initiative. The proposed methodology provides a practical and adaptable tool for monitoring and evaluating the governance of NbHIs, helping to identify strengths and weaknesses and offering guidance for targeted improvements. It enhances understanding of how these initiatives can generate meaningful environmental and health outcomes through stronger cross-sectoral collaboration, providing evidence to support their integration into both health and environmental policy agendas. Finally, the study illustrates the application of the tool by offering case-specific recommendations and actionable insights for practitioners involved in the design and implementation of NbHIs.
基于自然的卫生举措:基于指标的治理评估工具
基于自然的健康倡议(NbHIs)正在成为促进人类福祉和环境可持续性的创新方法。然而,缺乏一种标准化的方法来评估其实施所需的多参与者、多层次和多部门治理。本研究提出了一种评估工具,通过对意大利东北部处于不同发展阶段的三家NbHIs的多案例研究进行了实证检验,从而解决了这一差距。数据是通过与专家的20次深度结构化访谈和由倡议参与者完成的27份在线问卷收集的。根据专门构建的概念框架,共推导出152项治理指标,并按层次将其汇总为一个复合指数,旨在捕捉NbHI治理的多维性和上下文敏感性。研究结果强调,总体治理绩效在框架的所有维度和组件之间并不一致。这种可变性是由治理相关的和上下文因素形成的,例如参与者网络的组成和每个计划的成熟阶段。所建议的方法为监测和评估NbHIs的治理提供了一种实用且适应性强的工具,有助于确定优势和劣势,并为有针对性的改进提供指导。它增进了对这些举措如何能够通过更强有力的跨部门合作产生有意义的环境和健康成果的理解,并提供证据支持将这些举措纳入卫生和环境政策议程。最后,该研究通过为参与NbHIs设计和实施的从业者提供具体案例建议和可操作的见解来说明该工具的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书