How teachers’ creative pedagogies shape students’ creative thinking skills: a multilevel moderated mediation analysis from East Asia

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102112
Chunjin Chen , Hongbiao Yin
{"title":"How teachers’ creative pedagogies shape students’ creative thinking skills: a multilevel moderated mediation analysis from East Asia","authors":"Chunjin Chen ,&nbsp;Hongbiao Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>East Asian teachers’ pedagogical practices, rooted in Confucian heritage cultures, have sparked enduring debates about whether these pedagogies foster or impede creative thinking skills. This study addresses the debate by employing a multilevel moderated mediation model to examine how teachers’ creative pedagogies shape students’ creative thinking skills, with creative self-efficacy serving as the mediator and school openness to creativity as the moderator. Data were collected from 20,824 15-year-old students, who participated in PISA 2022, across 501 secondary schools in Hong Kong (China), Macao (China), Singapore, and South Korea. The results revealed some striking regional disparities. In Hong Kong (China) and Macao (China), creative pedagogies exhibited a significant positive direct effect on creative thinking skills, while negative effects were observed in Singapore and South Korea. Notably, creative self-efficacy consistently exerted a partial mediating role across all regions, with this mediating effect amplified in schools with higher openness to creativity in Hong Kong (China) and Singapore, but attenuated in Macao (China) and South Korea. The findings have implications for tailoring policies to reconcile creative pedagogies with regional norms and inspire future research on Confucian cultural variations in these mechanisms within East Asian educational contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102112"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125003591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

East Asian teachers’ pedagogical practices, rooted in Confucian heritage cultures, have sparked enduring debates about whether these pedagogies foster or impede creative thinking skills. This study addresses the debate by employing a multilevel moderated mediation model to examine how teachers’ creative pedagogies shape students’ creative thinking skills, with creative self-efficacy serving as the mediator and school openness to creativity as the moderator. Data were collected from 20,824 15-year-old students, who participated in PISA 2022, across 501 secondary schools in Hong Kong (China), Macao (China), Singapore, and South Korea. The results revealed some striking regional disparities. In Hong Kong (China) and Macao (China), creative pedagogies exhibited a significant positive direct effect on creative thinking skills, while negative effects were observed in Singapore and South Korea. Notably, creative self-efficacy consistently exerted a partial mediating role across all regions, with this mediating effect amplified in schools with higher openness to creativity in Hong Kong (China) and Singapore, but attenuated in Macao (China) and South Korea. The findings have implications for tailoring policies to reconcile creative pedagogies with regional norms and inspire future research on Confucian cultural variations in these mechanisms within East Asian educational contexts.
教师的创造性教学法如何塑造学生的创造性思维能力:来自东亚的多层次调节中介分析
植根于儒家传统文化的东亚教师的教学实践引发了关于这些教学方法是培养还是阻碍创造性思维技能的持久争论。本研究采用多层次有调节的中介模型,考察教师的创造性教学法如何塑造学生的创造性思维技能,其中创造性自我效能感是中介,学校对创造性的开放程度是中介。数据收集自20,824名参加PISA 2022的15岁学生,他们来自香港(中国)、澳门(中国)、新加坡和韩国的501所中学。结果显示出一些显著的地区差异。在香港(中国)和澳门(中国),创造性教学法对创造性思维技能有显著的正面直接影响,而在新加坡和韩国则有负面影响。值得注意的是,创造性自我效能感在所有地区都发挥了部分中介作用,这种中介作用在香港(中国)和新加坡对创造力开放程度较高的学校中被放大,但在澳门(中国)和韩国被减弱。研究结果对调整政策,使创造性教学法与地区规范相协调具有启示意义,并对东亚教育背景下这些机制中的儒家文化差异的未来研究产生启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书