Prompt engineering and creative pedagogical thinking: Insights from a qualitative study with teacher candidates

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102105
Seçil Tümen Akyıldız
{"title":"Prompt engineering and creative pedagogical thinking: Insights from a qualitative study with teacher candidates","authors":"Seçil Tümen Akyıldız","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This qualitative study explores how pre-service EFL teachers perceive and engage with prompt engineering as a tool to foster creative pedagogical thinking. Over the course of seven weeks, participants collaborated with the researcher to develop lesson materials using ChatGPT. The study draws on data collected through semi-structured interviews with ten participants and employs reflexive thematic analysis to interpret their experiences. Findings indicate that most teacher candidates transitioned from using simple prompts to designing more structured and purposeful ones, gradually developing both prompt literacy and confidence in AI-supported lesson planning. Three major themes emerged: conceptual understanding of prompt engineering, prompt design as a catalyst for creativity, and evolving skills through iterative practice. Participants highlighted the pedagogical benefits of AI in saving time, adapting content, and generating innovative ideas, though challenges such as evaluating AI output and formulating effective prompts were also noted. While the findings are context-specific, they suggest that prompt engineering—when supported by guided practice—can be a meaningful component in teacher education programs, contributing to the cultivation of digital literacy, reflective practice, and creative thinking in future educators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102105"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125003529","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study explores how pre-service EFL teachers perceive and engage with prompt engineering as a tool to foster creative pedagogical thinking. Over the course of seven weeks, participants collaborated with the researcher to develop lesson materials using ChatGPT. The study draws on data collected through semi-structured interviews with ten participants and employs reflexive thematic analysis to interpret their experiences. Findings indicate that most teacher candidates transitioned from using simple prompts to designing more structured and purposeful ones, gradually developing both prompt literacy and confidence in AI-supported lesson planning. Three major themes emerged: conceptual understanding of prompt engineering, prompt design as a catalyst for creativity, and evolving skills through iterative practice. Participants highlighted the pedagogical benefits of AI in saving time, adapting content, and generating innovative ideas, though challenges such as evaluating AI output and formulating effective prompts were also noted. While the findings are context-specific, they suggest that prompt engineering—when supported by guided practice—can be a meaningful component in teacher education programs, contributing to the cultivation of digital literacy, reflective practice, and creative thinking in future educators.
提示工程和创造性教学思维:来自教师候选人定性研究的见解
本质性研究探讨职前英语教师如何看待并参与将即时工程作为培养创造性教学思维的工具。在七周的课程中,参与者与研究人员合作,使用ChatGPT开发课程材料。该研究通过对10名参与者的半结构化访谈收集数据,并采用反身性主题分析来解释他们的经历。研究结果表明,大多数教师候选人从使用简单的提示过渡到设计更有结构和有目的的提示,逐渐培养了对人工智能支持的课程规划的快速读写能力和信心。三个主要主题出现了:对提示工程的概念理解,作为创造力催化剂的提示设计,以及通过迭代实践不断发展的技能。与会者强调了人工智能在节省时间、调整内容和产生创新想法方面的教学优势,但也指出了评估人工智能产出和制定有效提示等挑战。虽然研究结果是针对具体情况的,但它们表明,在指导实践的支持下,提示工程可以成为教师教育计划中有意义的组成部分,有助于培养未来教育工作者的数字素养、反思实践和创造性思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书