Facilitators and barriers to planning integration: Insights from Multi-plan Integration in China

IF 7 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Cities Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2025.106741
Min Cai , Jurian Edelenbos , Lasse Gerrits , Xiaopeng Sun
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers to planning integration: Insights from Multi-plan Integration in China","authors":"Min Cai ,&nbsp;Jurian Edelenbos ,&nbsp;Lasse Gerrits ,&nbsp;Xiaopeng Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integration in spatial planning remains a persistent challenge, especially amid growing environmental and societal complexities that demand coordinated solutions. While much research highlights facilitating factors for integration, less attention has been given to barriers that hinder cohesive planning, particularly within centralized governance contexts. This paper addresses this gap by investigating how Multi-Plan Integration (MPI) operates in practice within Chinas spatial planning system. Through a comparative case study of three MPI projects and one non-MPI project, we identify the effects, facilitators, and inhibitors of integration. Findings reveal that MPI can improve integration outcomes when supported by enabling institutional, instrumental, and contextual conditions, such as collaborative networks, effective process management, and adequate resources, but it does not guarantee success due to persistent challenges including fragmented expertise, low capacity of connective actors, and limited collaborative culture. Importantly, integration emerges not solely from top-down mandates but through bottom-up coordination, informal communication, and adaptive governance practices. This study contributes to spatial planning literature by highlighting pathways to integration in hybrid governance systems and provides an analytical framework for understanding the complex dynamics shaping planning integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 106741"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125010443","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integration in spatial planning remains a persistent challenge, especially amid growing environmental and societal complexities that demand coordinated solutions. While much research highlights facilitating factors for integration, less attention has been given to barriers that hinder cohesive planning, particularly within centralized governance contexts. This paper addresses this gap by investigating how Multi-Plan Integration (MPI) operates in practice within Chinas spatial planning system. Through a comparative case study of three MPI projects and one non-MPI project, we identify the effects, facilitators, and inhibitors of integration. Findings reveal that MPI can improve integration outcomes when supported by enabling institutional, instrumental, and contextual conditions, such as collaborative networks, effective process management, and adequate resources, but it does not guarantee success due to persistent challenges including fragmented expertise, low capacity of connective actors, and limited collaborative culture. Importantly, integration emerges not solely from top-down mandates but through bottom-up coordination, informal communication, and adaptive governance practices. This study contributes to spatial planning literature by highlighting pathways to integration in hybrid governance systems and provides an analytical framework for understanding the complex dynamics shaping planning integration.
规划整合的促进因素与障碍:来自中国多规划整合的洞察
空间规划的整合仍然是一个持续的挑战,特别是在日益复杂的环境和社会需要协调解决方案的情况下。虽然许多研究强调了促进集成的因素,但是很少注意到阻碍内聚计划的障碍,特别是在集中治理环境中。本文通过研究多规划一体化(MPI)在中国空间规划体系中的实际运行情况来解决这一差距。通过对三个MPI项目和一个非MPI项目的比较案例研究,我们确定了整合的效果、促进因素和抑制因素。研究结果表明,在协作网络、有效的流程管理和充足的资源等有利的制度、工具和背景条件的支持下,MPI可以改善整合结果,但由于专业知识碎片化、关联行为者能力低下和协作文化有限等持续存在的挑战,MPI并不能保证成功。重要的是,集成不仅来自自顶向下的命令,还来自自底向上的协调、非正式沟通和适应性治理实践。本研究通过强调混合治理系统中整合的途径,为空间规划文献做出了贡献,并为理解形成规划整合的复杂动态提供了分析框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书