Shored bullet entry wounds: key practical insights in aid of shooting investigations

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Science & Justice Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.scijus.2025.101375
Bandula Nishshanka , Chris Shepherd , Randika Ariyarathna
{"title":"Shored bullet entry wounds: key practical insights in aid of shooting investigations","authors":"Bandula Nishshanka ,&nbsp;Chris Shepherd ,&nbsp;Randika Ariyarathna","doi":"10.1016/j.scijus.2025.101375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>“Foreshoring” is a rarely examined phenomenon in shooting incidents and occurs when a bullet traverses an intermediate surface that is firmly pressed against the body prior to skin penetration. Building upon the only experimental study available to date, published in 1980, this empirical investigation systematically evaluated the macroscopic features of shored bullet entry wounds produced using a range of commonly encountered shoring materials and bullet types relevant to forensic casework. Porcine skin samples mounted in a custom-designed experimental apparatus were used to generate shored entry wounds, which were subsequently compared with control wounds created in the absence of a shoring surface. The influence of varying downward forces on wound morphology was also assessed. Statistically significant macroscopic differences between shored and standard bullet entry wounds have been identified, revealing novel wound profiles and underlying mechanisms. Findings demonstrate that downward force does not alter the macroscopic morphology of shored-entry wounds, and even minimal separation between the skin and the supporting surface produces wound characteristics distinct from those of true shoring. The study also clarifies previous misconceptions, including a masking effect in close-range shots where gunshot residue may obscure key wound features. While presenting novel insights concerning shored gunshot entry wounds for practical forensic caseworks, the findings of this study highlight that the accurate recognition of shored-entry wounds is essential for reconstructing shooting incidents, interpreting wound patterns, and preventing misclassification in medicolegal investigations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49565,"journal":{"name":"Science & Justice","volume":"66 1","pages":"Article 101375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355030625001595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Foreshoring” is a rarely examined phenomenon in shooting incidents and occurs when a bullet traverses an intermediate surface that is firmly pressed against the body prior to skin penetration. Building upon the only experimental study available to date, published in 1980, this empirical investigation systematically evaluated the macroscopic features of shored bullet entry wounds produced using a range of commonly encountered shoring materials and bullet types relevant to forensic casework. Porcine skin samples mounted in a custom-designed experimental apparatus were used to generate shored entry wounds, which were subsequently compared with control wounds created in the absence of a shoring surface. The influence of varying downward forces on wound morphology was also assessed. Statistically significant macroscopic differences between shored and standard bullet entry wounds have been identified, revealing novel wound profiles and underlying mechanisms. Findings demonstrate that downward force does not alter the macroscopic morphology of shored-entry wounds, and even minimal separation between the skin and the supporting surface produces wound characteristics distinct from those of true shoring. The study also clarifies previous misconceptions, including a masking effect in close-range shots where gunshot residue may obscure key wound features. While presenting novel insights concerning shored gunshot entry wounds for practical forensic caseworks, the findings of this study highlight that the accurate recognition of shored-entry wounds is essential for reconstructing shooting incidents, interpreting wound patterns, and preventing misclassification in medicolegal investigations.
支撑子弹射入伤:帮助射击调查的关键实践见解
在射击事件中,“前冲”是一种很少被研究的现象,发生在子弹在穿透皮肤之前穿过紧贴身体的中间表面时。在1980年发表的迄今为止唯一可用的实验研究的基础上,本实证研究系统地评估了使用一系列常见的支撑材料和与法医案件相关的子弹类型产生的支撑子弹射入伤的宏观特征。将猪皮肤样本安装在定制设计的实验装置中,用于产生有支撑的进入伤口,随后将其与没有支撑表面的对照伤口进行比较。不同的向下作用力对创面形态的影响也进行了评估。统计上显著的宏观差异在支撑和标准子弹射入伤口之间已经被确定,揭示了新的伤口特征和潜在的机制。研究结果表明,向下的力不会改变支撑伤口的宏观形态,即使皮肤和支撑表面之间的最小分离也会产生与真正支撑伤口不同的伤口特征。该研究还澄清了之前的误解,包括近距离射击时的掩蔽效应,其中射击残留物可能会掩盖关键的伤口特征。本研究的结果在为实际法医案件提供有关枪弹射入伤的新见解的同时,强调了准确识别枪弹射入伤对于重建枪击事件、解释伤口模式和防止法医调查中的错误分类至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Justice
Science & Justice 医学-病理学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
98
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Science & Justice provides a forum to promote communication and publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that spark debates within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector. The journal provides a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed. Science & Justice is published six times a year, and will be of interest primarily to practising forensic scientists and their colleagues in related fields. It is chiefly concerned with the publication of formal scientific papers, in keeping with its international learned status, but will not accept any article describing experimentation on animals which does not meet strict ethical standards. Promote communication and informed debate within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector. To promote the publication of learned and original research findings from all areas of the forensic sciences and by so doing to advance the profession. To promote the publication of case based material by way of case reviews. To promote the publication of conference proceedings which are of interest to the forensic science community. To provide a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed. To appeal to all those with an interest in the forensic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书