A review of reservoir stimulation technologies for enhanced geothermal systems

IF 18 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.116618
Kaiyun Lei , Youliang Chen , Xi Du , Yungui Pan , Bo Lu , Pengjiao Jia , Tomas Manuel Fernandez-Steegerc , Rafig Azzamb
{"title":"A review of reservoir stimulation technologies for enhanced geothermal systems","authors":"Kaiyun Lei ,&nbsp;Youliang Chen ,&nbsp;Xi Du ,&nbsp;Yungui Pan ,&nbsp;Bo Lu ,&nbsp;Pengjiao Jia ,&nbsp;Tomas Manuel Fernandez-Steegerc ,&nbsp;Rafig Azzamb","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) are a critical technology for the global low-carbon energy transition, yet their widespread commercialization is hindered by the core challenge of deep reservoir stimulation. To address this, we propose a unified analytical framework centered on the “Engineering Trilemma\": the conflicting objectives of ensuring effective connectivity, achieving sustainable heat extraction, and managing induced seismicity. A systematic assessment of the three primary stimulation paradigms—hydraulic, chemical, and thermal—reveals a crucial insight: no single technology can independently resolve its inherent trade-offs. While hydraulic stimulation is most potent for creating macroscopic connectivity, it poses the highest seismic and environmental risks. Chemical stimulation offers precise, micro-scale control but is constrained by a limited radius of influence and applicability to specific mineralogies. Thermal stimulation presents a less invasive, endogenous energy-driven approach, yet its efficacy is highly contingent on specific geological settings. This central insight reframes EGS engineering as the continuous management of these trade-offs and points to an inevitable paradigm shift. Future development must move beyond reliance on any single technology toward a data-driven, integrated, and adaptive reservoir management philosophy. This evolution will ultimately pave the way for a fundamental transition from speculative geological exploration to deterministic subsurface engineering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 116618"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125012912","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) are a critical technology for the global low-carbon energy transition, yet their widespread commercialization is hindered by the core challenge of deep reservoir stimulation. To address this, we propose a unified analytical framework centered on the “Engineering Trilemma": the conflicting objectives of ensuring effective connectivity, achieving sustainable heat extraction, and managing induced seismicity. A systematic assessment of the three primary stimulation paradigms—hydraulic, chemical, and thermal—reveals a crucial insight: no single technology can independently resolve its inherent trade-offs. While hydraulic stimulation is most potent for creating macroscopic connectivity, it poses the highest seismic and environmental risks. Chemical stimulation offers precise, micro-scale control but is constrained by a limited radius of influence and applicability to specific mineralogies. Thermal stimulation presents a less invasive, endogenous energy-driven approach, yet its efficacy is highly contingent on specific geological settings. This central insight reframes EGS engineering as the continuous management of these trade-offs and points to an inevitable paradigm shift. Future development must move beyond reliance on any single technology toward a data-driven, integrated, and adaptive reservoir management philosophy. This evolution will ultimately pave the way for a fundamental transition from speculative geological exploration to deterministic subsurface engineering.
增强型地热系统储层增产技术综述
增强型地热系统(EGS)是全球低碳能源转型的一项关键技术,但其广泛商业化受到深层油藏增产的核心挑战的阻碍。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个以“工程三难困境”为中心的统一分析框架:确保有效连通性、实现可持续的热量提取和管理诱发地震活动的相互冲突的目标。对三种主要增产方式(水力增产、化学增产和热增产)的系统评估揭示了一个关键的观点:没有一种技术可以独立解决其固有的权衡。虽然水力增产对于建立宏观连通性是最有效的,但它也带来了最大的地震和环境风险。化学增产能够提供精确的微尺度控制,但受限于影响范围和对特定矿物学的适用性。热增产是一种侵入性较小、内源性能量驱动的方法,但其效果在很大程度上取决于特定的地质环境。这一核心见解将EGS工程重新定义为对这些权衡的持续管理,并指出了不可避免的范式转变。未来的开发必须超越对任何单一技术的依赖,转向数据驱动、集成和自适应的油藏管理理念。这种演变最终将为从投机性地质勘探到确定性地下工程的根本转变铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书