Kaiyun Lei , Youliang Chen , Xi Du , Yungui Pan , Bo Lu , Pengjiao Jia , Tomas Manuel Fernandez-Steegerc , Rafig Azzamb
{"title":"A review of reservoir stimulation technologies for enhanced geothermal systems","authors":"Kaiyun Lei , Youliang Chen , Xi Du , Yungui Pan , Bo Lu , Pengjiao Jia , Tomas Manuel Fernandez-Steegerc , Rafig Azzamb","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) are a critical technology for the global low-carbon energy transition, yet their widespread commercialization is hindered by the core challenge of deep reservoir stimulation. To address this, we propose a unified analytical framework centered on the “Engineering Trilemma\": the conflicting objectives of ensuring effective connectivity, achieving sustainable heat extraction, and managing induced seismicity. A systematic assessment of the three primary stimulation paradigms—hydraulic, chemical, and thermal—reveals a crucial insight: no single technology can independently resolve its inherent trade-offs. While hydraulic stimulation is most potent for creating macroscopic connectivity, it poses the highest seismic and environmental risks. Chemical stimulation offers precise, micro-scale control but is constrained by a limited radius of influence and applicability to specific mineralogies. Thermal stimulation presents a less invasive, endogenous energy-driven approach, yet its efficacy is highly contingent on specific geological settings. This central insight reframes EGS engineering as the continuous management of these trade-offs and points to an inevitable paradigm shift. Future development must move beyond reliance on any single technology toward a data-driven, integrated, and adaptive reservoir management philosophy. This evolution will ultimately pave the way for a fundamental transition from speculative geological exploration to deterministic subsurface engineering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 116618"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125012912","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) are a critical technology for the global low-carbon energy transition, yet their widespread commercialization is hindered by the core challenge of deep reservoir stimulation. To address this, we propose a unified analytical framework centered on the “Engineering Trilemma": the conflicting objectives of ensuring effective connectivity, achieving sustainable heat extraction, and managing induced seismicity. A systematic assessment of the three primary stimulation paradigms—hydraulic, chemical, and thermal—reveals a crucial insight: no single technology can independently resolve its inherent trade-offs. While hydraulic stimulation is most potent for creating macroscopic connectivity, it poses the highest seismic and environmental risks. Chemical stimulation offers precise, micro-scale control but is constrained by a limited radius of influence and applicability to specific mineralogies. Thermal stimulation presents a less invasive, endogenous energy-driven approach, yet its efficacy is highly contingent on specific geological settings. This central insight reframes EGS engineering as the continuous management of these trade-offs and points to an inevitable paradigm shift. Future development must move beyond reliance on any single technology toward a data-driven, integrated, and adaptive reservoir management philosophy. This evolution will ultimately pave the way for a fundamental transition from speculative geological exploration to deterministic subsurface engineering.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.