Using point dendrometers to improve forest transpiration estimation accuracy at stand scales

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110986
Ryan M. Bright , Danielle Creek , Holger Lange , Helge Meissner , Morgane Merlin , Junbin Zhao
{"title":"Using point dendrometers to improve forest transpiration estimation accuracy at stand scales","authors":"Ryan M. Bright ,&nbsp;Danielle Creek ,&nbsp;Holger Lange ,&nbsp;Helge Meissner ,&nbsp;Morgane Merlin ,&nbsp;Junbin Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest transpiration is often quantified by scaling up stem sap flow measured on a few trees within a stand. This procedure carries uncertainty related to the (ill)representativeness of the sampled trees for the entire stand, often comprising several thousand transpiring trees. Here, we explored the uncertainty reduction potential afforded by increasing the number of sampled trees within the stand – not by costly sap flow monitoring equipment – but by point dendrometers measuring sub-daily fluctuations in stem radii which partially correlate with xylem water movement (i.e., sap flow). Using measurements collected in a forest dominated by even-aged spruce trees over two growing seasons, we built an empirical model for estimating hourly sap flow from individual trees equipped with point dendrometers, then applied it to estimate the daily transpiration of the stand both with and without trees equipped with point dendrometers. We found that the expanded tree sample size reduced the uncertainty of the stand-level estimate by 31–37 %, suggesting that the benefit afforded by increasing the stand representativeness outweighed the cost of introducing modeling error. Given their relative simplicity and affordability, we encourage additional investigations into the use of point dendrometers for studying tree water relations and water consumption patterns of entire forested stands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 110986"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325006057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest transpiration is often quantified by scaling up stem sap flow measured on a few trees within a stand. This procedure carries uncertainty related to the (ill)representativeness of the sampled trees for the entire stand, often comprising several thousand transpiring trees. Here, we explored the uncertainty reduction potential afforded by increasing the number of sampled trees within the stand – not by costly sap flow monitoring equipment – but by point dendrometers measuring sub-daily fluctuations in stem radii which partially correlate with xylem water movement (i.e., sap flow). Using measurements collected in a forest dominated by even-aged spruce trees over two growing seasons, we built an empirical model for estimating hourly sap flow from individual trees equipped with point dendrometers, then applied it to estimate the daily transpiration of the stand both with and without trees equipped with point dendrometers. We found that the expanded tree sample size reduced the uncertainty of the stand-level estimate by 31–37 %, suggesting that the benefit afforded by increasing the stand representativeness outweighed the cost of introducing modeling error. Given their relative simplicity and affordability, we encourage additional investigations into the use of point dendrometers for studying tree water relations and water consumption patterns of entire forested stands.
利用点树木计提高林分尺度森林蒸腾估算精度
森林蒸腾作用通常是通过在一个林分内的几棵树上按比例测量茎液流来量化的。这一过程具有与整个林分(通常包括数千棵蒸腾树)取样树木的(不良)代表性相关的不确定性。在这里,我们探索了通过增加林分内采样树木的数量来减少不确定性的潜力——不是通过昂贵的液流监测设备——而是通过测量与木质部水分运动(即液流)部分相关的茎半径次日波动的点树木计。利用两个生长季节在均龄云杉为主的森林中采集的数据,我们建立了一个经验模型来估算每小时的树液流量,然后将其应用于估算有树和没有树的林分的日蒸腾。我们发现,扩大的树木样本量将林分水平估算的不确定性降低了31 - 37%,这表明增加林分代表性所带来的好处超过了引入建模误差的成本。鉴于点树木密度计相对简单和可负担,我们鼓励进一步研究点树木密度计的使用,以研究树木的水分关系和整个林分的水消耗模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书