Elderly confidants in geriatric assessment.

E C Clipp, G H Elder
{"title":"Elderly confidants in geriatric assessment.","authors":"E C Clipp,&nbsp;G H Elder","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study focuses on patterns of consensus between linked samples (focal person and confidant; total n = 124) for the purpose of explaining divergent reports and of assessing this design's utility in geriatric case assessment. Correlations, difference scores and group contrasts suggest that elderly informants who are also confidants can describe most internal states of their partners as these states are self-reported. Partners differed however, on ratings of self-esteem; confidant scores were significantly higher than self-ratings. Under certain conditions self-other discrepancy also occurs on spouse ratings of functional health: in early stages of decline and in marriages judged by clinicians to be of poor quality. This pattern is absent in pairs with women friends. The findings suggest that losses and age-related limitations have the potential to erode the self-esteem of older people and that linked samples would strengthen the process of functional assessment by bringing special information to the clinician.</p>","PeriodicalId":77914,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive gerontology. Section B, Behavioural, social, and applied sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive gerontology. Section B, Behavioural, social, and applied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on patterns of consensus between linked samples (focal person and confidant; total n = 124) for the purpose of explaining divergent reports and of assessing this design's utility in geriatric case assessment. Correlations, difference scores and group contrasts suggest that elderly informants who are also confidants can describe most internal states of their partners as these states are self-reported. Partners differed however, on ratings of self-esteem; confidant scores were significantly higher than self-ratings. Under certain conditions self-other discrepancy also occurs on spouse ratings of functional health: in early stages of decline and in marriages judged by clinicians to be of poor quality. This pattern is absent in pairs with women friends. The findings suggest that losses and age-related limitations have the potential to erode the self-esteem of older people and that linked samples would strengthen the process of functional assessment by bringing special information to the clinician.

老年评估中的老年知己。
本研究侧重于关联样本之间的共识模式(焦点人和知己;总n = 124),目的是解释不同的报告,并评估该设计在老年病例评估中的实用性。相关性、差异分数和群体对比表明,同样是密友的老年告密者可以描述他们伴侣的大多数内部状态,因为这些状态是他们自己报告的。然而,伴侣们在自尊的评分上存在差异;知己评分明显高于自我评分。在某些条件下,配偶对功能健康的评价也出现自我-他人差异:在早期阶段下降和临床医生认为质量差的婚姻中。这种模式在女性朋友中是不存在的。研究结果表明,失物和年龄相关的限制有可能侵蚀老年人的自尊,而相关样本将通过向临床医生提供特殊信息来加强功能评估的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信