The Added Value of Cascaded Plane Wave Imaging for Autocorrelation- and Cross-Correlation-Based Velocity Vector Imaging

IF 1.8
Joosje M. K. De Bakker;Ingvild K. Ekroll;Anne E. C. M. Saris;Jørgen Avdal
{"title":"The Added Value of Cascaded Plane Wave Imaging for Autocorrelation- and Cross-Correlation-Based Velocity Vector Imaging","authors":"Joosje M. K. De Bakker;Ingvild K. Ekroll;Anne E. C. M. Saris;Jørgen Avdal","doi":"10.1109/OJUFFC.2025.3639374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Velocity vector imaging (VVI) can suffer from poor signal-to-noise (SNR) conditions, eventually restricting the estimation of velocities at low SNRs. Cascaded dual-polarity wave (CDW) imaging has been shown to enhance blood-SNR, thereby improving cross-correlation-based VVI. However, the CDW decoding process is sensitive to motion, where imperfect summation and cancellation of pulses can lead to reduced amplitude gain and ghost pulses outside the main pulse. Multi/dual-angle transmits, combined with either autocorrelation- or cross-correlation-based axial velocity estimation, are commonly used for VVI. Both techniques have intrinsic limitations, such as speckle decorrelation and aliasing, and strengths, where autocorrelation is known to be more resistant to noise and cross-correlation results in more accurate estimates in high SNR conditions. This study evaluates the benefits of CDW imaging for both autocorrelation- and cross-correlation-based VVI using the FLUST simulation toolbox and experiments, including parabolic and rotational flow scenarios. The results indicate that autocorrelation performs consistently across the entire SNR range, while cross-correlation is more accurate and precise in high SNR conditions. CDW improves estimation performance in low SNR conditions, particularly for estimation of low velocities, with a more substantial performance boost for cross-correlation compared to autocorrelation. In general, CDW imaging shows to be beneficial for VVI, independent of the used velocity estimator.","PeriodicalId":73301,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","volume":"5 ","pages":"281-285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11272879","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11272879/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Velocity vector imaging (VVI) can suffer from poor signal-to-noise (SNR) conditions, eventually restricting the estimation of velocities at low SNRs. Cascaded dual-polarity wave (CDW) imaging has been shown to enhance blood-SNR, thereby improving cross-correlation-based VVI. However, the CDW decoding process is sensitive to motion, where imperfect summation and cancellation of pulses can lead to reduced amplitude gain and ghost pulses outside the main pulse. Multi/dual-angle transmits, combined with either autocorrelation- or cross-correlation-based axial velocity estimation, are commonly used for VVI. Both techniques have intrinsic limitations, such as speckle decorrelation and aliasing, and strengths, where autocorrelation is known to be more resistant to noise and cross-correlation results in more accurate estimates in high SNR conditions. This study evaluates the benefits of CDW imaging for both autocorrelation- and cross-correlation-based VVI using the FLUST simulation toolbox and experiments, including parabolic and rotational flow scenarios. The results indicate that autocorrelation performs consistently across the entire SNR range, while cross-correlation is more accurate and precise in high SNR conditions. CDW improves estimation performance in low SNR conditions, particularly for estimation of low velocities, with a more substantial performance boost for cross-correlation compared to autocorrelation. In general, CDW imaging shows to be beneficial for VVI, independent of the used velocity estimator.
级联平面波成像在基于自相关和相互相关的速度矢量成像中的附加价值
速度矢量成像(VVI)可能会受到较低信噪比(SNR)条件的影响,最终限制了低信噪比下的速度估计。级联双极性波(CDW)成像已被证明可以增强血液信噪比,从而改善基于互相关的VVI。然而,CDW解码过程对运动很敏感,其中脉冲的不完美叠加和抵消会导致幅度增益降低和主脉冲外的鬼脉冲。多/双角度传输,结合基于自相关或相互相关的轴向速度估计,通常用于VVI。这两种技术都有固有的局限性,例如散斑去相关和混叠,以及优点,其中自相关被认为更能抵抗噪声,而相互关联在高信噪比条件下可以更准确地估计。本研究使用FLUST模拟工具箱和实验,包括抛物线和旋转流场景,评估了CDW成像对基于自相关和相互相关的VVI的好处。结果表明,自相关在整个信噪比范围内表现一致,而互相关在高信噪比条件下更为准确和精确。CDW提高了低信噪比条件下的估计性能,特别是对低速的估计,与自相关相比,交叉相关的性能提升更大。一般来说,CDW成像对VVI是有益的,与使用的速度估计器无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书