Breaking the Intergenerational Cycle of Abuse - a Randomized Controlled Prevention Trial in Parents with Serious Mental Illness.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Sabine C Herpertz,Corinne Neukel,Katharina Williams,Anna Georg,Judith von Schönfeld,Nikola Schoofs,Catherine Hindi Attar,Dorota Buczylowska,Katja Boedeker,Theresa Dankowski,Michael Kalab,Marc Wenigmann,Jaqueline Scharf,Tabea von der Lühe,Michael Kaess,Steffen Luntz,Astrid Dempfle,Felix Bermpohl,Svenja Taubner
{"title":"Breaking the Intergenerational Cycle of Abuse - a Randomized Controlled Prevention Trial in Parents with Serious Mental Illness.","authors":"Sabine C Herpertz,Corinne Neukel,Katharina Williams,Anna Georg,Judith von Schönfeld,Nikola Schoofs,Catherine Hindi Attar,Dorota Buczylowska,Katja Boedeker,Theresa Dankowski,Michael Kalab,Marc Wenigmann,Jaqueline Scharf,Tabea von der Lühe,Michael Kaess,Steffen Luntz,Astrid Dempfle,Felix Bermpohl,Svenja Taubner","doi":"10.1159/000549647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nAlthough children of parents with mental illness (MI) are at increased risk of adverse childhood experiences and parental maltreatment, prevention trials targeting parents with MI are scarce. In addition, meta-analyses highlight significant methodological shortcomings in the current research.\r\n\r\nTRIAL DESIGN\r\nTo investigate real-world efficacy of a 12-hours mentalization-based parenting counselling program (MB-PC) compared to a psychoeducation workshop (SCC+) as supplements to standard clinical care (SCC).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis large-scale, cluster-randomized, open-label (partially observer-blind), active-controlled bicentre superiority trial was conducted at German psychiatric hospitals. It included 252 patients undergoing psychiatric treatment for various serious MIs. MB-PC subsumed five individual sessions including video feedback, five group sessions that guided parents to better understand and respond to their child's mental states, and two sessions of social counselling, all provided by an interprofessional hospital team of non-psychothera¬pists.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPatients in the MB-PC arm reported improved parenting practices - measured by the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ) total score as primary outcome - at post-intervention compared to those from the SSC+ arm (effect size (ES) = 0.43, 95% CI (0.13, 0.73), p=0.004), but group difference decreased at 3-months follow-up (ES = 0.25, 95% CI (-0.04, 0.53), p=0.085). All secondary outcomes were in favour of the MB-PC intervention, such as parental stress, child abuse potential, and child emotional well-being.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nImplementing a mentalisation-based parenting programme in routine psychiatric hospital care may represent an important step forward in reducing the risk of child maltreatment and neglect among offspring of parents affected by severe mental disorders.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"155 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Although children of parents with mental illness (MI) are at increased risk of adverse childhood experiences and parental maltreatment, prevention trials targeting parents with MI are scarce. In addition, meta-analyses highlight significant methodological shortcomings in the current research. TRIAL DESIGN To investigate real-world efficacy of a 12-hours mentalization-based parenting counselling program (MB-PC) compared to a psychoeducation workshop (SCC+) as supplements to standard clinical care (SCC). METHODS This large-scale, cluster-randomized, open-label (partially observer-blind), active-controlled bicentre superiority trial was conducted at German psychiatric hospitals. It included 252 patients undergoing psychiatric treatment for various serious MIs. MB-PC subsumed five individual sessions including video feedback, five group sessions that guided parents to better understand and respond to their child's mental states, and two sessions of social counselling, all provided by an interprofessional hospital team of non-psychothera¬pists. RESULTS Patients in the MB-PC arm reported improved parenting practices - measured by the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ) total score as primary outcome - at post-intervention compared to those from the SSC+ arm (effect size (ES) = 0.43, 95% CI (0.13, 0.73), p=0.004), but group difference decreased at 3-months follow-up (ES = 0.25, 95% CI (-0.04, 0.53), p=0.085). All secondary outcomes were in favour of the MB-PC intervention, such as parental stress, child abuse potential, and child emotional well-being. CONCLUSION Implementing a mentalisation-based parenting programme in routine psychiatric hospital care may represent an important step forward in reducing the risk of child maltreatment and neglect among offspring of parents affected by severe mental disorders.
打破虐待的代际循环——在患有严重精神疾病的父母中进行的随机对照预防试验。
虽然父母患有精神疾病(MI)的孩子在不良童年经历和父母虐待的风险增加,但针对MI父母的预防试验很少。此外,荟萃分析突出了当前研究中方法论上的重大缺陷。试验设计:研究作为标准临床护理(SCC)补充的12小时基于心理的育儿咨询项目(MB-PC)与心理教育研讨会(SCC+)的现实效果。方法在德国精神病院进行大规模、集群随机、开放标签(部分观察者盲)、主动对照的双中心优势试验。其中包括252名因各种严重MIs接受精神治疗的患者。MB-PC包括五个包括视频反馈的个人会议,五个指导父母更好地了解和应对孩子精神状态的小组会议,以及两个社会咨询会议,所有这些会议都由非心理治疗师组成的跨专业医院团队提供。结果与SSC+组相比,MB-PC组的患者在干预后报告了父母教养方式的改善(以阿拉巴马父母教养问卷(APQ)总分作为主要结果测量)(效应量(ES) = 0.43, 95% CI (0.13, 0.73), p=0.004),但在3个月的随访中,组间差异减小(ES = 0.25, 95% CI (-0.04, 0.53), p=0.085)。所有次要结果均支持MB-PC干预,如父母压力、儿童虐待潜力和儿童情绪健康。结论在精神病院的常规护理中实施以精神化为基础的养育方案,可能是降低父母患有严重精神障碍的子女遭受虐待和忽视的风险的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
29.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field. As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers. The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书