Characterizing endotypes in chronic rhinosinusitis: emerging research and clinical applications.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Steven Chun-Kang Liao, Brooke N Gleason, Bruce K Tan
{"title":"Characterizing endotypes in chronic rhinosinusitis: emerging research and clinical applications.","authors":"Steven Chun-Kang Liao, Brooke N Gleason, Bruce K Tan","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000001105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of this study is to describe why this review is timely and relevant. Endotyping, the organization of rhinologic inflammation around immunologic precepts, has evolved from a research subject to a clinically relevant tool with the advent of targeted biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This review highlights recent progress but also the challenges to implementing endotype-based care into routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Describe the main themes in the literature covered by the article. Recent literature demonstrates organization of patients around multiple endotypes, most prominently Type 2, Type 1/3, pauci-inflammation, and mixed inflammatory profiles. Three principal approaches to endotyping have been widely utilized: cellular (histology-based) analysis, single-biomarker, and multibiomarkers assays. Emerging machine-learning models further enhance data-driven multibiomarkers classification. Importantly, developed endotypes demonstrate correlates with key clinical features, postoperative outcomes, and responsiveness to sinus surgery and biologic therapy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Describe the implications of the findings for clinical practice or research. Increase use of precision biologics necessitates developing well validated endotypes to better select therapy for patients. Three major approaches - histology-based, single-biomarker, and multibiomarker strategies - are commonly employed, each with distinct advantages and limitations. Moving forward, standardization of methods, development of cost-effective testing, and rigorous clinical validation remain essential steps.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"16-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000001105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this study is to describe why this review is timely and relevant. Endotyping, the organization of rhinologic inflammation around immunologic precepts, has evolved from a research subject to a clinically relevant tool with the advent of targeted biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This review highlights recent progress but also the challenges to implementing endotype-based care into routine clinical practice.

Recent findings: Describe the main themes in the literature covered by the article. Recent literature demonstrates organization of patients around multiple endotypes, most prominently Type 2, Type 1/3, pauci-inflammation, and mixed inflammatory profiles. Three principal approaches to endotyping have been widely utilized: cellular (histology-based) analysis, single-biomarker, and multibiomarkers assays. Emerging machine-learning models further enhance data-driven multibiomarkers classification. Importantly, developed endotypes demonstrate correlates with key clinical features, postoperative outcomes, and responsiveness to sinus surgery and biologic therapy.

Summary: Describe the implications of the findings for clinical practice or research. Increase use of precision biologics necessitates developing well validated endotypes to better select therapy for patients. Three major approaches - histology-based, single-biomarker, and multibiomarker strategies - are commonly employed, each with distinct advantages and limitations. Moving forward, standardization of methods, development of cost-effective testing, and rigorous clinical validation remain essential steps.

表征慢性鼻窦炎的内源性:新兴研究和临床应用。
综述的目的:本研究的目的是描述为什么本综述是及时和相关的。随着慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)靶向生物制剂的出现,鼻内分型(Endotyping)已经从一项研究课题发展成为一种临床相关工具。这篇综述强调了最近的进展,但也强调了在常规临床实践中实施内源性护理的挑战。最近的发现:描述文章所涵盖的文献中的主要主题。最近的文献表明,患者围绕多种内型组织,最突出的是2型、1/3型、囊性炎症和混合炎症。内皮分型的三种主要方法已被广泛应用:细胞(基于组织的)分析,单一生物标志物和多生物标志物分析。新兴的机器学习模型进一步增强了数据驱动的多生物标志物分类。重要的是,发达的内窥镜类型与关键的临床特征、术后结果以及对鼻窦手术和生物治疗的反应性相关。摘要:描述研究结果对临床实践或研究的意义。增加精密生物制剂的使用需要开发良好验证的内型,以更好地为患者选择治疗。三种主要的方法-基于组织,单一生物标志物和多生物标志物策略-通常被采用,每一种都有不同的优点和局限性。展望未来,方法标准化、开发具有成本效益的检测和严格的临床验证仍然是必不可少的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including maxillofacial surgery, head and neck oncology and speech therapy and rehabilitation – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书