Steven Chun-Kang Liao, Brooke N Gleason, Bruce K Tan
{"title":"Characterizing endotypes in chronic rhinosinusitis: emerging research and clinical applications.","authors":"Steven Chun-Kang Liao, Brooke N Gleason, Bruce K Tan","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000001105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of this study is to describe why this review is timely and relevant. Endotyping, the organization of rhinologic inflammation around immunologic precepts, has evolved from a research subject to a clinically relevant tool with the advent of targeted biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This review highlights recent progress but also the challenges to implementing endotype-based care into routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Describe the main themes in the literature covered by the article. Recent literature demonstrates organization of patients around multiple endotypes, most prominently Type 2, Type 1/3, pauci-inflammation, and mixed inflammatory profiles. Three principal approaches to endotyping have been widely utilized: cellular (histology-based) analysis, single-biomarker, and multibiomarkers assays. Emerging machine-learning models further enhance data-driven multibiomarkers classification. Importantly, developed endotypes demonstrate correlates with key clinical features, postoperative outcomes, and responsiveness to sinus surgery and biologic therapy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Describe the implications of the findings for clinical practice or research. Increase use of precision biologics necessitates developing well validated endotypes to better select therapy for patients. Three major approaches - histology-based, single-biomarker, and multibiomarker strategies - are commonly employed, each with distinct advantages and limitations. Moving forward, standardization of methods, development of cost-effective testing, and rigorous clinical validation remain essential steps.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"16-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000001105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: The purpose of this study is to describe why this review is timely and relevant. Endotyping, the organization of rhinologic inflammation around immunologic precepts, has evolved from a research subject to a clinically relevant tool with the advent of targeted biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This review highlights recent progress but also the challenges to implementing endotype-based care into routine clinical practice.
Recent findings: Describe the main themes in the literature covered by the article. Recent literature demonstrates organization of patients around multiple endotypes, most prominently Type 2, Type 1/3, pauci-inflammation, and mixed inflammatory profiles. Three principal approaches to endotyping have been widely utilized: cellular (histology-based) analysis, single-biomarker, and multibiomarkers assays. Emerging machine-learning models further enhance data-driven multibiomarkers classification. Importantly, developed endotypes demonstrate correlates with key clinical features, postoperative outcomes, and responsiveness to sinus surgery and biologic therapy.
Summary: Describe the implications of the findings for clinical practice or research. Increase use of precision biologics necessitates developing well validated endotypes to better select therapy for patients. Three major approaches - histology-based, single-biomarker, and multibiomarker strategies - are commonly employed, each with distinct advantages and limitations. Moving forward, standardization of methods, development of cost-effective testing, and rigorous clinical validation remain essential steps.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including maxillofacial surgery, head and neck oncology and speech therapy and rehabilitation – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.