Living alone and adult loneliness: The buffering role of neighbourhood social interaction and attachment

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Public Health Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.106098
Andreas Lindegaard Jakobsen
{"title":"Living alone and adult loneliness: The buffering role of neighbourhood social interaction and attachment","authors":"Andreas Lindegaard Jakobsen","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.106098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to examine the association between living alone and adult loneliness, and the buffering role of neighbourhood social interaction and attachment on this association.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Survey data encompassing 15,044 adults aged 35 and older from the North Denmark Region Health Survey 2017 were linked to Danish population register data. Loneliness was assessed using the Three-Item Loneliness Scale (T-ILS). Neighbourhood social interaction, attachment and living arrangements were measured through survey-based indicators. Register data provided information on sociodemographic covariates including sex, age, own/parental country of birth, education, income, and employment status. Multilevel linear probability models, with individuals nested within small area neighbourhoods, were used to test the hypotheses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After adjusting for covariates, living alone was significantly associated with an 8.72 percentage point higher probability of loneliness. Individuals reporting frequent neighbourhood social interactions or high levels of neighbourhood attachment had an 8.18 and 5.06 percentage point lower probability of loneliness, respectively. Moderation analyses indicated that both neighbourhood social interaction and attachment significantly buffered the negative impact of living alone, as living alone was less strongly associated with loneliness among individuals who reported high levels of neighbourhood social interaction and attachment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings suggest that neighbourhood social interaction and attachment may buffer the negative impact of living alone on loneliness. Strengthening neighbourhood attachment and fostering local social interactions could be valuable public health strategies to mitigate loneliness among individuals living alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106098"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003335062500544X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to examine the association between living alone and adult loneliness, and the buffering role of neighbourhood social interaction and attachment on this association.

Study design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

Survey data encompassing 15,044 adults aged 35 and older from the North Denmark Region Health Survey 2017 were linked to Danish population register data. Loneliness was assessed using the Three-Item Loneliness Scale (T-ILS). Neighbourhood social interaction, attachment and living arrangements were measured through survey-based indicators. Register data provided information on sociodemographic covariates including sex, age, own/parental country of birth, education, income, and employment status. Multilevel linear probability models, with individuals nested within small area neighbourhoods, were used to test the hypotheses.

Results

After adjusting for covariates, living alone was significantly associated with an 8.72 percentage point higher probability of loneliness. Individuals reporting frequent neighbourhood social interactions or high levels of neighbourhood attachment had an 8.18 and 5.06 percentage point lower probability of loneliness, respectively. Moderation analyses indicated that both neighbourhood social interaction and attachment significantly buffered the negative impact of living alone, as living alone was less strongly associated with loneliness among individuals who reported high levels of neighbourhood social interaction and attachment.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that neighbourhood social interaction and attachment may buffer the negative impact of living alone on loneliness. Strengthening neighbourhood attachment and fostering local social interactions could be valuable public health strategies to mitigate loneliness among individuals living alone.
独居与成人孤独:邻里社会互动与依恋的缓冲作用。
目的:本研究旨在探讨独居与成人孤独感的关系,以及邻里社会交往和依恋在这一关系中的缓冲作用。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:来自2017年北丹麦地区健康调查的15044名35岁及以上成年人的调查数据与丹麦人口登记数据相关联。孤独感采用三项孤独感量表(T-ILS)进行评估。通过基于调查的指标来衡量邻里社会互动、依恋和生活安排。登记数据提供了社会人口学协变量的信息,包括性别、年龄、自己/父母出生的国家、教育程度、收入和就业状况。使用多层线性概率模型,将个体嵌套在小区域的社区中,来检验这些假设。结果:调整协变量后,独居与8.72个百分点的孤独概率显著相关。报告频繁的邻里社交活动或高水平的邻里依恋的个体,孤独的可能性分别降低了8.18%和5.06个百分点。适度分析表明,邻里社会互动和依恋都显著缓冲了独居的负面影响,因为在报告邻里社会互动和依恋水平较高的个体中,独居与孤独感的相关性较弱。结论:邻里社会交往和依恋可以缓冲独居对孤独感的负面影响。加强邻里关系和促进当地社会互动可能是减轻独居者孤独感的宝贵公共卫生战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书