Deepak Menon, Jan-Herman Kuiper, Andrea Bailey, Michael Murphy, Yumna Ladha, Peter Gallacher, Paul Jermin, Andrew Roberts, Geraint Thomas, Charlotte H Hulme, Karina T Wright
{"title":"Evaluating the utility of a patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) end-of-trial event to re-engage with cell-based therapy participants.","authors":"Deepak Menon, Jan-Herman Kuiper, Andrea Bailey, Michael Murphy, Yumna Ladha, Peter Gallacher, Paul Jermin, Andrew Roberts, Geraint Thomas, Charlotte H Hulme, Karina T Wright","doi":"10.1080/17460751.2025.2601546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Although research in cell-based therapy is expanding, little is known about patient experience in cell therapy trials to-date. This study explores the experience and attitudes of participants involved in the ASCOT randomized controlled trial, a long-term orthopedic study comparing different cell therapies for the treatment of knee articular cartilage defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical and rehabilitation experience of participants, and their attitudes relating to i) patient and public involvement (PPIE) in research and ii) future research on cellular therapy and clinical trials were explored through questionnaires. To gather this information, the utility of an end-of-trial event to reengage participants was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the anticipated high burden, overall trial experience was reported as highly positive. Communication and ongoing engagement between patients and both the clinical and research teams may have contributed to this. Key challenges identified for future research include the need for early and transparent communication regarding trial results, and greater support to facilitate active PPIE involvement. The end-of-trial engagement event demonstrated feasibility and value as a model to gather this important PPIE data for future studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the importance of integrating participant perspectives to optimize trial design and delivery in future cell therapy research.</p>","PeriodicalId":21043,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"673-687"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12915861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460751.2025.2601546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Although research in cell-based therapy is expanding, little is known about patient experience in cell therapy trials to-date. This study explores the experience and attitudes of participants involved in the ASCOT randomized controlled trial, a long-term orthopedic study comparing different cell therapies for the treatment of knee articular cartilage defects.
Methods: The clinical and rehabilitation experience of participants, and their attitudes relating to i) patient and public involvement (PPIE) in research and ii) future research on cellular therapy and clinical trials were explored through questionnaires. To gather this information, the utility of an end-of-trial event to reengage participants was evaluated.
Results: Despite the anticipated high burden, overall trial experience was reported as highly positive. Communication and ongoing engagement between patients and both the clinical and research teams may have contributed to this. Key challenges identified for future research include the need for early and transparent communication regarding trial results, and greater support to facilitate active PPIE involvement. The end-of-trial engagement event demonstrated feasibility and value as a model to gather this important PPIE data for future studies.
Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of integrating participant perspectives to optimize trial design and delivery in future cell therapy research.
期刊介绍:
Regenerative medicine replaces or regenerates human cells, tissue or organs, to restore or establish normal function*. Since 2006, Regenerative Medicine has been at the forefront of publishing the very best papers and reviews covering the entire regenerative medicine sector. The journal focusses on the entire spectrum of approaches to regenerative medicine, including small molecule drugs, biologics, biomaterials and tissue engineering, and cell and gene therapies – it’s all about regeneration and not a specific platform technology. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of the sector ranging from discovery research, through to clinical development, through to commercialization. Regenerative Medicine uniquely supports this important area of biomedical science and healthcare by providing a peer-reviewed journal totally committed to publishing the very best regenerative medicine research, clinical translation and commercialization.
Regenerative Medicine provides a specialist forum to address the important challenges and advances in regenerative medicine, delivering this essential information in concise, clear and attractive article formats – vital to a rapidly growing, multidisciplinary and increasingly time-constrained community.
Despite substantial developments in our knowledge and understanding of regeneration, the field is still in its infancy. However, progress is accelerating. The next few decades will see the discovery and development of transformative therapies for patients, and in some cases, even cures. Regenerative Medicine will continue to provide a critical overview of these advances as they progress, undergo clinical trials, and eventually become mainstream medicine.