Optimizing Gamma Knife radiosurgery: Analysis of gains achieved through upgradation of technology.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Arun Thimmarayappa, Nishanth Sadashiva, Subhas Kanti Konar, Abhinith Shashidhar, Vikas Vazhayil, A R Prabhuraj, Manish Beniwal, Arivazhagan Arimappamagan, Dwarakanath Srinivas, Harsh Deora, Bhanumathy Govindaswamy, Gyani Jail Singh Birua, Ponnusamy Natesan, Jeeva Balakrishnan, Nandakarthik Govindarajan
{"title":"Optimizing Gamma Knife radiosurgery: Analysis of gains achieved through upgradation of technology.","authors":"Arun Thimmarayappa, Nishanth Sadashiva, Subhas Kanti Konar, Abhinith Shashidhar, Vikas Vazhayil, A R Prabhuraj, Manish Beniwal, Arivazhagan Arimappamagan, Dwarakanath Srinivas, Harsh Deora, Bhanumathy Govindaswamy, Gyani Jail Singh Birua, Ponnusamy Natesan, Jeeva Balakrishnan, Nandakarthik Govindarajan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) using the 4C system faces challenges with treatment cancellations due to clearance issues, frame complications, and limited treatment space. Understanding cancellation factors is crucial for optimizing patient selection and workflow, particularly with technological advancements in newer systems.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This study analyzed the factors associated with treatment feasibility and cancellation in Gamma Knife 4C (GK4C) radiosurgery and explored potential benefits of upgrading to Gamma Knife Icon (GKI) technology, incorporating evidence on clearance mechanisms and treatment improvements.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 108 consecutive patients planned for GK4C treatment between 2006 and 2020. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment parameters, and reasons for cancellation were collected. Statistical analyses examined associations between variables and treatment feasibility. Hypothetical GKI plans assessed potential improvements. A PubMed review identified 69 studies that addressed treatment cancellation and technological improvements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main reasons for GK4C cancellation were clearance issues (41.7%), high organ-at-risk doses (35.2%), and large target volumes (23.1%). Associations were found between reason for cancellation and tumor volume, diagnosis, location, and prescribed dose. Multivariate analysis showed skull base and peripheral lesions had higher odds of clearance issues. Literature confirms that frame distortion, limited space, and inadequate collision detection are primary GK4C system limitations. GKI plans demonstrated improved target coverage and reduced organ-at-risk doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clearance is a major limitation of GK4C radiosurgery, particularly for certain tumor locations and volumes. Literature supports that GKI technology improves treatment feasibility through frameless options, cone-beam CT guidance, enhanced collision detection, and improved stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 ","pages":"295-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12708000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) using the 4C system faces challenges with treatment cancellations due to clearance issues, frame complications, and limited treatment space. Understanding cancellation factors is crucial for optimizing patient selection and workflow, particularly with technological advancements in newer systems.

Aims and objectives: This study analyzed the factors associated with treatment feasibility and cancellation in Gamma Knife 4C (GK4C) radiosurgery and explored potential benefits of upgrading to Gamma Knife Icon (GKI) technology, incorporating evidence on clearance mechanisms and treatment improvements.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 108 consecutive patients planned for GK4C treatment between 2006 and 2020. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment parameters, and reasons for cancellation were collected. Statistical analyses examined associations between variables and treatment feasibility. Hypothetical GKI plans assessed potential improvements. A PubMed review identified 69 studies that addressed treatment cancellation and technological improvements.

Results: The main reasons for GK4C cancellation were clearance issues (41.7%), high organ-at-risk doses (35.2%), and large target volumes (23.1%). Associations were found between reason for cancellation and tumor volume, diagnosis, location, and prescribed dose. Multivariate analysis showed skull base and peripheral lesions had higher odds of clearance issues. Literature confirms that frame distortion, limited space, and inadequate collision detection are primary GK4C system limitations. GKI plans demonstrated improved target coverage and reduced organ-at-risk doses.

Conclusion: Clearance is a major limitation of GK4C radiosurgery, particularly for certain tumor locations and volumes. Literature supports that GKI technology improves treatment feasibility through frameless options, cone-beam CT guidance, enhanced collision detection, and improved stability.

优化伽玛刀放射外科:通过技术升级获得的收益分析。
使用4C系统的伽玛刀放射外科(GKRS)面临着由于清除问题、框架并发症和治疗空间有限而取消治疗的挑战。了解取消因素对于优化患者选择和工作流程至关重要,特别是随着新系统的技术进步。目的和目的:本研究分析了影响伽玛刀4C (GK4C)放射手术治疗可行性和取消的相关因素,并探讨了升级到伽玛刀Icon (GKI)技术的潜在益处,包括清除机制和治疗改进的证据。材料与方法:对2006 - 2020年计划连续治疗的108例GK4C患者进行回顾性分析。收集了人口统计学、肿瘤特征、治疗参数和取消治疗的原因等数据。统计分析检验了变量与治疗可行性之间的关联。假设的GKI计划评估了潜在的改进。PubMed的一篇综述确定了69项涉及取消治疗和技术改进的研究。结果:GK4C取消的主要原因是清除问题(41.7%)、高器官危险剂量(35.2%)和大靶体积(23.1%)。发现切除的原因与肿瘤体积、诊断、部位和处方剂量有关。多变量分析显示颅底和周围病变有更高的清除问题的几率。文献证实,帧失真、有限的空间和不充分的碰撞检测是GK4C系统的主要限制。GKI计划表明提高了目标覆盖率并减少了器官危险剂量。结论:清除是GK4C放射手术的主要限制,特别是对于某些肿瘤位置和体积。文献支持GKI技术通过无框架选择、锥束CT引导、增强的碰撞检测和提高的稳定性提高了治疗的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书