Assessing the efficacy of systemic antibiotics for biofilm-associated infection in an ovine model of simulated fracture-related infection.

IF 2.7 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection Pub Date : 2025-12-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5194/jbji-10-511-2025
Robert Falconer, David Rothberg, Walker Kay, Connor Hunt, Richard Tyler Epperson, Brooke Kawaguchi, Nicholas Ashton, Dustin Williams
{"title":"Assessing the efficacy of systemic antibiotics for biofilm-associated infection in an ovine model of simulated fracture-related infection.","authors":"Robert Falconer, David Rothberg, Walker Kay, Connor Hunt, Richard Tyler Epperson, Brooke Kawaguchi, Nicholas Ashton, Dustin Williams","doi":"10.5194/jbji-10-511-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Infection remains a major complication of open fractures, with rates reaching up to 70 % after severe injury. Systemic antibiotics often fail to achieve the therapeutic levels needed to disrupt biofilm at the wound site due to compromised blood flow and systemic dilution. This study investigates the efficacy of systemic antibiotics against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> monomicrobial biofilms in an ovine model of simulated fracture-related infection (FRI). <b>Methods</b>: An established model of long-bone FRI in the right hind limb of mature Rambouillet sheep was adapted. Local soft tissue trauma was induced, the periosteum was stripped from the tibial surface, and a simulated fracture was created on the bone surface. The site was inoculated with mature biofilm grown on fracture fixation plates. Sheep were assigned to a treatment group receiving 10 d of systemic antibiotic therapy or a positive control group that received no treatment. All animals were sacrificed at 21 d, and microbiological and histological analysis was performed. <b>Results</b>: Systemic antibiotics failed to produce a statistically significant reduction in <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm compared to the positive control. Systemic therapy significantly reduced <i>P. aeruginosa</i> bioburden compared to the positive control, but levels remained above the clinical threshold for infection. The histological analysis revealed moderate improvement from systemic treatment. <b>Conclusions</b>: This investigation established the limitations of systemic antibiotic therapy in this model of long-bone FRI against <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> biofilms. Microbiological and histological analyses revealed hallmark features of recalcitrance to systemic treatment, validating the utility of this model to study anti-infective therapies. These findings highlight the need for new antibiotic delivery strategies to manage biofilm-associated infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"10 6","pages":"511-524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12707314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-511-2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Infection remains a major complication of open fractures, with rates reaching up to 70 % after severe injury. Systemic antibiotics often fail to achieve the therapeutic levels needed to disrupt biofilm at the wound site due to compromised blood flow and systemic dilution. This study investigates the efficacy of systemic antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa monomicrobial biofilms in an ovine model of simulated fracture-related infection (FRI). Methods: An established model of long-bone FRI in the right hind limb of mature Rambouillet sheep was adapted. Local soft tissue trauma was induced, the periosteum was stripped from the tibial surface, and a simulated fracture was created on the bone surface. The site was inoculated with mature biofilm grown on fracture fixation plates. Sheep were assigned to a treatment group receiving 10 d of systemic antibiotic therapy or a positive control group that received no treatment. All animals were sacrificed at 21 d, and microbiological and histological analysis was performed. Results: Systemic antibiotics failed to produce a statistically significant reduction in S. aureus biofilm compared to the positive control. Systemic therapy significantly reduced P. aeruginosa bioburden compared to the positive control, but levels remained above the clinical threshold for infection. The histological analysis revealed moderate improvement from systemic treatment. Conclusions: This investigation established the limitations of systemic antibiotic therapy in this model of long-bone FRI against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms. Microbiological and histological analyses revealed hallmark features of recalcitrance to systemic treatment, validating the utility of this model to study anti-infective therapies. These findings highlight the need for new antibiotic delivery strategies to manage biofilm-associated infections.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在模拟骨折相关感染的羊模型中评估全身抗生素对生物膜相关感染的疗效。
感染仍然是开放性骨折的主要并发症,严重损伤后感染的发生率高达70%。由于血流受损和全身稀释,全身性抗生素通常无法达到破坏伤口部位生物膜所需的治疗水平。本研究在模拟骨折相关感染(FRI)的绵羊模型中研究了全身抗生素对金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌单微生物生物膜的疗效。方法:采用已建立的成熟朗布依羊右后肢长骨FRI模型。局部软组织损伤诱导,骨膜剥离胫骨表面,骨表面模拟骨折。在该部位接种生长在骨折固定板上的成熟生物膜。将绵羊分为两组,一组接受10 d的全身抗生素治疗,另一组为阳性对照组,未接受任何治疗。21 d处死所有动物,进行微生物学和组织学分析。结果:与阳性对照相比,系统抗生素未能产生具有统计学意义的金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜减少。与阳性对照相比,全身治疗显著降低了铜绿假单胞菌的生物负荷,但水平仍高于临床感染阈值。组织学分析显示全身治疗有中度改善。结论:本研究确定了在长骨FRI模型中对金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌生物膜进行全身抗生素治疗的局限性。微生物学和组织学分析揭示了对全身治疗抵抗的标志性特征,验证了该模型在研究抗感染治疗方面的实用性。这些发现强调需要新的抗生素递送策略来管理生物膜相关感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书