1,3,5-Triazine-benzenesulfonamide hybrids: are they cytotoxic?

IF 5.1 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mária Bodnár Mikulová , Jana Hricovíniová , Michal Hanko , Gabriela Greifová
{"title":"1,3,5-Triazine-benzenesulfonamide hybrids: are they cytotoxic?","authors":"Mária Bodnár Mikulová ,&nbsp;Jana Hricovíniová ,&nbsp;Michal Hanko ,&nbsp;Gabriela Greifová","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In contemporary pharmaceutical research, cytotoxicity assays constitute an indispensable tool in the systematic evaluation of drug candidates. The identification of cytotoxic effects at early stages of development is critical, as it allows for the elimination of compounds with unfavourable toxicological properties prior to their advancement into preclinical and clinical testing. Despite the essential role of cytotoxicity studies, the relationship between chemical structure and cytotoxic outcome remains insufficiently defined for many classes of compounds. In this context, 1,3,5-triazine derivatives have emerged as a particularly promising scaffold due to their broad spectrum of biological activities, with notable emphasis on anticancer potential. However, the absence of a comprehensive structure–cytotoxicity correlation highlights the need for systematic evaluation and consolidation of findings. In this review, we provide an overview of triazine-benzenesulfonamide hybrid molecules, including their synthesis and purification procedures, as well as their biological activity and cytotoxicity. The novel strategies in new candidate drug development and structure modifications related to their effects on investigated protein and/or non-protein targets, as well as various cell lines, are included to demonstrate a relationship between structure and antiproliferative activity, as well as cytotoxicity. Moreover, the literature reveals substantial variability in the methods used to assess antiproliferative and cytotoxic activity, which hinders comparisons and the interpretation of structure–activity relationships. Adoption of a standardized framework—particularly consistent reporting of IC₅₀ values—would improve reproducibility, facilitate meaningful cross-study comparisons, and provide a stronger foundation for linking molecular design with biological response. Ultimately, such standardisation may advance drug discovery and support the rational modification of chemical structures to enhance therapeutic potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 107416"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098725004130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contemporary pharmaceutical research, cytotoxicity assays constitute an indispensable tool in the systematic evaluation of drug candidates. The identification of cytotoxic effects at early stages of development is critical, as it allows for the elimination of compounds with unfavourable toxicological properties prior to their advancement into preclinical and clinical testing. Despite the essential role of cytotoxicity studies, the relationship between chemical structure and cytotoxic outcome remains insufficiently defined for many classes of compounds. In this context, 1,3,5-triazine derivatives have emerged as a particularly promising scaffold due to their broad spectrum of biological activities, with notable emphasis on anticancer potential. However, the absence of a comprehensive structure–cytotoxicity correlation highlights the need for systematic evaluation and consolidation of findings. In this review, we provide an overview of triazine-benzenesulfonamide hybrid molecules, including their synthesis and purification procedures, as well as their biological activity and cytotoxicity. The novel strategies in new candidate drug development and structure modifications related to their effects on investigated protein and/or non-protein targets, as well as various cell lines, are included to demonstrate a relationship between structure and antiproliferative activity, as well as cytotoxicity. Moreover, the literature reveals substantial variability in the methods used to assess antiproliferative and cytotoxic activity, which hinders comparisons and the interpretation of structure–activity relationships. Adoption of a standardized framework—particularly consistent reporting of IC₅₀ values—would improve reproducibility, facilitate meaningful cross-study comparisons, and provide a stronger foundation for linking molecular design with biological response. Ultimately, such standardisation may advance drug discovery and support the rational modification of chemical structures to enhance therapeutic potential.

Abstract Image

1,3,5-三嗪-苯磺酰胺杂合体:它们有细胞毒性吗?
在当代药物研究中,细胞毒性试验是对候选药物进行系统评价不可或缺的工具。在开发的早期阶段识别细胞毒性作用是至关重要的,因为它允许在进入临床前和临床试验之前消除具有不利毒理学特性的化合物。尽管细胞毒性研究的重要作用,化学结构和细胞毒性结果之间的关系仍然没有充分定义的许多类别的化合物。在这种情况下,1,3,5-三嗪衍生物由于其广泛的生物活性而成为一种特别有前途的支架,特别是抗癌潜力。然而,缺乏全面的结构-细胞毒性相关性突出了系统评估和巩固研究结果的必要性。本文综述了三嗪-苯磺酰胺杂化分子的合成和纯化方法,以及它们的生物活性和细胞毒性。新候选药物开发的新策略和结构修饰与它们对所研究的蛋白质和/或非蛋白质靶点以及各种细胞系的影响有关,包括结构与抗增殖活性以及细胞毒性之间的关系。此外,文献揭示了用于评估抗增殖和细胞毒性活性的方法的实质性差异,这阻碍了结构-活性关系的比较和解释。采用标准化框架-特别是IC₅0值的一致报告-将提高可重复性,促进有意义的交叉研究比较,并为将分子设计与生物反应联系起来提供更坚实的基础。最终,这种标准化可以促进药物发现,并支持化学结构的合理修改,以提高治疗潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.20%
发文量
248
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development. More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making. Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书