Selective Industrial Policy and Innovation Efficiency in Chinese Listed Companies

IF 1.6 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Xiulu Huang, Rui Zhu
{"title":"Selective Industrial Policy and Innovation Efficiency in Chinese Listed Companies","authors":"Xiulu Huang,&nbsp;Rui Zhu","doi":"10.1111/ecot.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>For a long time, selective industrial policy has been widely used by governments around the world as a key tool for economic intervention. But how do these policies affect corporate innovation efficiency? This paper examines the Ten Industry Revitalisation Plan (TIRP), an emergency policy response by the Chinese government to the global economic downturn of 2008, treating it as an exogenous shock. The empirical analysis shows that the TIRP significantly reduced innovation efficiency, with this effect proving persistent even after the policy period ended. Mechanism analysis reveals that the policy decreased treated firm innovation efficiency by increasing government subsidies, impairing investment efficiency and exacerbating capital misallocation. Further investigation indicates that the TIRP has a stronger pushing-up effect on the innovative capital input of firms state-owned and firms with low productivity and diverts innovation resources to less productive or innovative firms, yielding nonachievement of the expected innovation outcomes. This study concludes that selective industrial policy poses a significant barrier to improving innovation efficiency, offering valuable insights for enhancing economic innovation performance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":40265,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","volume":"34 1","pages":"117-136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecot.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For a long time, selective industrial policy has been widely used by governments around the world as a key tool for economic intervention. But how do these policies affect corporate innovation efficiency? This paper examines the Ten Industry Revitalisation Plan (TIRP), an emergency policy response by the Chinese government to the global economic downturn of 2008, treating it as an exogenous shock. The empirical analysis shows that the TIRP significantly reduced innovation efficiency, with this effect proving persistent even after the policy period ended. Mechanism analysis reveals that the policy decreased treated firm innovation efficiency by increasing government subsidies, impairing investment efficiency and exacerbating capital misallocation. Further investigation indicates that the TIRP has a stronger pushing-up effect on the innovative capital input of firms state-owned and firms with low productivity and diverts innovation resources to less productive or innovative firms, yielding nonachievement of the expected innovation outcomes. This study concludes that selective industrial policy poses a significant barrier to improving innovation efficiency, offering valuable insights for enhancing economic innovation performance.

选择性产业政策与中国上市公司创新效率
长期以来,选择性产业政策被世界各国政府广泛用作经济干预的重要工具。但是这些政策是如何影响企业创新效率的呢?本文将“十大产业振兴计划”作为中国政府应对2008年全球经济衰退的应急政策,将其视为外生冲击。实证分析表明,税收优惠政策显著降低了创新效率,即使在政策期结束后,这种影响仍然存在。机制分析表明,该政策通过增加政府补贴、损害投资效率和加剧资本错配来降低企业创新效率。进一步的研究表明,技术创新计划对国有企业和低生产率企业的创新资本投入有较强的推动作用,并将创新资源转移到生产率较低的企业或创新企业,导致创新成果未达到预期。研究发现,选择性产业政策对创新效率的提高存在显著的阻碍,为提高经济创新绩效提供了有价值的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书