{"title":"Victorian Women and the Gendering of Mountaineering in the Alps","authors":"William Bainbridge","doi":"10.1111/1468-0424.12849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the gendered segregation of Victorian mountaineering, highlighting how societal norms sought to confine women to passive roles within the alpine landscape. As Elizabeth Le Blond declared, ‘there is no manlier sport in the world than mountaineering’, encapsulating the pervasive attitudes of the era. Despite such views, several women like her navigated these constraints, forging spaces of resilience and agency. Victorian guidebooks and literature often advised women to avoid strenuous terrains and instead focus on more gentle activities, reinforcing a narrative that segregated their participation. Yet, through travel narratives, artistic depictions and personal accounts, many women subtly subverted these boundaries. This paper also examines the complex relationships between female climbers and local male guides, as evidenced in the writings of Amelia B. Edwards, revealing how these interactions both challenged and reinforced societal expectations. By uncovering these nuanced dynamics, the study argues that while mountaineering was predominantly male-dominated, women played a significant, yet deliberately overlooked, role in its history, negotiating and redefining their place within the mountains.</p>","PeriodicalId":46382,"journal":{"name":"Gender and History","volume":"37 3","pages":"864-874"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-0424.12849","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and History","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0424.12849","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article explores the gendered segregation of Victorian mountaineering, highlighting how societal norms sought to confine women to passive roles within the alpine landscape. As Elizabeth Le Blond declared, ‘there is no manlier sport in the world than mountaineering’, encapsulating the pervasive attitudes of the era. Despite such views, several women like her navigated these constraints, forging spaces of resilience and agency. Victorian guidebooks and literature often advised women to avoid strenuous terrains and instead focus on more gentle activities, reinforcing a narrative that segregated their participation. Yet, through travel narratives, artistic depictions and personal accounts, many women subtly subverted these boundaries. This paper also examines the complex relationships between female climbers and local male guides, as evidenced in the writings of Amelia B. Edwards, revealing how these interactions both challenged and reinforced societal expectations. By uncovering these nuanced dynamics, the study argues that while mountaineering was predominantly male-dominated, women played a significant, yet deliberately overlooked, role in its history, negotiating and redefining their place within the mountains.
这篇文章探讨了维多利亚时代登山运动中的性别隔离,强调了社会规范如何试图将女性限制在高山景观中的被动角色。正如伊丽莎白·勒·布隆德所说,“世界上没有比登山运动更有男子气概的运动了”,这概括了那个时代普遍存在的态度。尽管有这样的观点,但还是有几位像她一样的女性克服了这些限制,打造了弹性和能动性的空间。维多利亚时代的旅游指南和文学作品经常建议女性避开艰苦的地形,而是专注于更温和的活动,强化了一种将女性参与隔离开来的叙事。然而,通过旅行叙述、艺术描绘和个人叙述,许多女性巧妙地颠覆了这些界限。本文还研究了女性登山者和当地男性导游之间的复杂关系,正如Amelia B. Edwards的著作所证明的那样,揭示了这些互动如何挑战和加强社会期望。通过揭示这些微妙的动态,该研究认为,虽然登山运动主要是男性主导的,但女性在其历史上扮演了重要的角色,但却被故意忽视了,她们在山上协商和重新定义了自己的位置。
期刊介绍:
Gender & History is now established as the major international journal for research and writing on the history of femininity and masculinity and of gender relations. Spanning epochs and continents, Gender & History examines changing conceptions of gender, and maps the dialogue between femininities, masculinities and their historical contexts. The journal publishes rigorous and readable articles both on particular episodes in gender history and on broader methodological questions which have ramifications for the discipline as a whole.