N. Shigeta, J. Hagiwara, D. Custodio, N. Kimura, T. Asahi, K. Ozawa, T. Yamaguchi, G. Fukushima, Y. Nakamura, A. Sasoh
{"title":"Experimental investigation of the Chester problem with weak shock waves propagating in converging ducts with quasi-steady flow","authors":"N. Shigeta, J. Hagiwara, D. Custodio, N. Kimura, T. Asahi, K. Ozawa, T. Yamaguchi, G. Fukushima, Y. Nakamura, A. Sasoh","doi":"10.1007/s00193-025-01244-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Chester problem (Adv. Appl. Mech. 6:119–152, 1960) introduces a quasi-one-dimensional (quasi-1D) analytical solution developed by Chester based on Chester–Chisnell–Whitham (CCW) theory (Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 232:350–370, 1955; Lond. Edinb. Philos. Mag. 45:1293–1301, 1954; J. Fluid Mech. 2:286–298, 1957; J. Fluid Mech. 4:337–360, 1958) addressing the interaction between a steady flow within a converging–diverging duct and a shock wave entering from the converging section. Although Chester’s solution provided approximate results for both weak and strong shock waves, this study derives a solution without limitations on the shock Mach number. Additionally, experiments were conducted using a <i>three-channel shock tube</i>, equipped with two diaphragms with adjustable relative rupture timings, to investigate the interaction between the flow and weak shock waves (shock Mach number 1.01–1.10) in the converging section, where the lower wall is flat. The shock wave reflects off the converging upper wall; however, at particularly low shock Mach numbers, the arrival of the reflected wave at the lower wall is delayed. In such cases, the shock wave near the lower wall, which remains unaffected by duct compression, diverges from the quasi-1D solution, and the pressure behind the shock wave is reduced by the upstream co-directional flow. These findings confirm that the shock wave can be attenuated by the non-turbulent, steady upstream flow.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":"35 6","pages":"721 - 737"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00193-025-01244-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-025-01244-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Chester problem (Adv. Appl. Mech. 6:119–152, 1960) introduces a quasi-one-dimensional (quasi-1D) analytical solution developed by Chester based on Chester–Chisnell–Whitham (CCW) theory (Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 232:350–370, 1955; Lond. Edinb. Philos. Mag. 45:1293–1301, 1954; J. Fluid Mech. 2:286–298, 1957; J. Fluid Mech. 4:337–360, 1958) addressing the interaction between a steady flow within a converging–diverging duct and a shock wave entering from the converging section. Although Chester’s solution provided approximate results for both weak and strong shock waves, this study derives a solution without limitations on the shock Mach number. Additionally, experiments were conducted using a three-channel shock tube, equipped with two diaphragms with adjustable relative rupture timings, to investigate the interaction between the flow and weak shock waves (shock Mach number 1.01–1.10) in the converging section, where the lower wall is flat. The shock wave reflects off the converging upper wall; however, at particularly low shock Mach numbers, the arrival of the reflected wave at the lower wall is delayed. In such cases, the shock wave near the lower wall, which remains unaffected by duct compression, diverges from the quasi-1D solution, and the pressure behind the shock wave is reduced by the upstream co-directional flow. These findings confirm that the shock wave can be attenuated by the non-turbulent, steady upstream flow.
期刊介绍:
Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization.
The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine.
Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community.
The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.