Disaster risk reduction and resilience building in vulnerable communities: the role of community participation in Jordan

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Disasters Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI:10.1111/disa.70038
Luay Jum'a, Sudki Hamdan
{"title":"Disaster risk reduction and resilience building in vulnerable communities: the role of community participation in Jordan","authors":"Luay Jum'a,&nbsp;Sudki Hamdan","doi":"10.1111/disa.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explored disaster risk reduction (DRR) and resilience building in vulnerable communities in Jordan. It focused on four key areas: perceived environmental and human-made risks; the effectiveness of national DRR strategies at the local level; factors influencing community participation in DRR planning; and perceptions of infrastructure and preparedness. A mixed-methods design was used, combining 10 focus-group discussions and a structured survey of 512 respondents in Madaba and Jerash Governorates. The results revealed major gaps in infrastructure readiness, public awareness, and community involvement in DRR efforts. Although some participants acknowledged national DRR policies and early warning systems, local implementation was weak. Barriers to community engagement included poor communication, inconvenient meeting times, and institutional limitations. Nonetheless, the involvement of local associations and inclusive mechanisms showed potential for improving participation. The study underscores the importance of context-sensitive, locally-driven DRR strategies that strengthen infrastructure and empower communities. It recommends better alignment between national policies and local realities, enhanced communication, and greater community engagement. Limitations include the use of self-reported data and a cross-sectional design. Future research should adopt longitudinal approaches and examine the role of specific demographic groups in shaping DRR outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.70038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored disaster risk reduction (DRR) and resilience building in vulnerable communities in Jordan. It focused on four key areas: perceived environmental and human-made risks; the effectiveness of national DRR strategies at the local level; factors influencing community participation in DRR planning; and perceptions of infrastructure and preparedness. A mixed-methods design was used, combining 10 focus-group discussions and a structured survey of 512 respondents in Madaba and Jerash Governorates. The results revealed major gaps in infrastructure readiness, public awareness, and community involvement in DRR efforts. Although some participants acknowledged national DRR policies and early warning systems, local implementation was weak. Barriers to community engagement included poor communication, inconvenient meeting times, and institutional limitations. Nonetheless, the involvement of local associations and inclusive mechanisms showed potential for improving participation. The study underscores the importance of context-sensitive, locally-driven DRR strategies that strengthen infrastructure and empower communities. It recommends better alignment between national policies and local realities, enhanced communication, and greater community engagement. Limitations include the use of self-reported data and a cross-sectional design. Future research should adopt longitudinal approaches and examine the role of specific demographic groups in shaping DRR outcomes.

弱势社区减少灾害风险和建设复原力:约旦社区参与的作用。
本研究探讨了约旦脆弱社区的灾害风险减少和复原力建设。它侧重于四个关键领域:感知到的环境和人为风险;国家减少灾害风险战略在地方一级的有效性;影响社区参与减灾规划的因素;以及对基础设施和准备的看法。采用混合方法设计,结合了10个焦点小组讨论和对Madaba省和Jerash省512名受访者的结构化调查。结果显示,在基础设施准备、公众意识和社区参与减灾工作方面存在重大差距。尽管一些与会者承认国家的减灾政策和早期预警系统,但地方执行不力。社区参与的障碍包括沟通不畅、会议时间不方便和制度限制。尽管如此,地方协会和包容性机制的参与显示出改善参与的潜力。该研究强调了因地制宜、以地方为导向的减少灾害风险战略的重要性,这些战略可以加强基础设施建设,增强社区能力。报告建议更好地协调国家政策和地方实际情况,加强沟通,加强社区参与。局限性包括使用自我报告的数据和横断面设计。未来的研究应采用纵向方法,并检查特定人口群体在形成DRR结果中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书