Beyond the undermining effect: Extrinsic rewards preserve neural intrinsic reward

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioural Brain Research Pub Date : 2026-03-12 Epub Date: 2025-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115996
Hiroaki Ayabe , Takahiko Koike , Ayumi Yoshioka , Satoshi Izuno , Kanae Ogasawara , Shohei Tsuchimoto , Norihiro Sadato
{"title":"Beyond the undermining effect: Extrinsic rewards preserve neural intrinsic reward","authors":"Hiroaki Ayabe ,&nbsp;Takahiko Koike ,&nbsp;Ayumi Yoshioka ,&nbsp;Satoshi Izuno ,&nbsp;Kanae Ogasawara ,&nbsp;Shohei Tsuchimoto ,&nbsp;Norihiro Sadato","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Self-Determination Theory posits that extrinsic reward withdrawal often undermines intrinsic motivation. This undermining effect varies according to the reward category (e.g., monetary vs. praise). However, the mechanism underlying this variability remains unclear, partly because previous studies have conceptualized intrinsic motivation as a single construct without distinguishing <em>liking</em> (intrinsic value) from <em>wanting</em> (motivational drive). Failure to make this distinction may obscure the effects of rewards on each component. We hypothesized that extrinsic reward withdrawal would differentially affect intrinsic value and motivational drive. To test this hypothesis, we conducted functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on 54 participants who were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: control (no rewards), monetary reward, or social reward. Participants in the monetary and social reward groups played a stopwatch game twice, first with and then without extrinsic rewards. The control group received no extrinsic rewards during the task. We assessed intrinsic value through fMRI-measured activation of the reward system and motivational drive through voluntary engagement during the task intermission. Intrinsic value, measured by activation in predefined reward-related regions, declined in the control group but was preserved in both extrinsic reward groups after withdrawal. Thus, both monetary and social rewards were associated with preserved intrinsic value. However, intrinsic behavioral motivation declined in the monetary group but was maintained in the social group. These findings suggest that extrinsic reward withdrawal differentially influences intrinsic value and motivational drive across reward categories, thereby clarifying the variability of the undermining effect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"501 ","pages":"Article 115996"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825005832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Self-Determination Theory posits that extrinsic reward withdrawal often undermines intrinsic motivation. This undermining effect varies according to the reward category (e.g., monetary vs. praise). However, the mechanism underlying this variability remains unclear, partly because previous studies have conceptualized intrinsic motivation as a single construct without distinguishing liking (intrinsic value) from wanting (motivational drive). Failure to make this distinction may obscure the effects of rewards on each component. We hypothesized that extrinsic reward withdrawal would differentially affect intrinsic value and motivational drive. To test this hypothesis, we conducted functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on 54 participants who were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: control (no rewards), monetary reward, or social reward. Participants in the monetary and social reward groups played a stopwatch game twice, first with and then without extrinsic rewards. The control group received no extrinsic rewards during the task. We assessed intrinsic value through fMRI-measured activation of the reward system and motivational drive through voluntary engagement during the task intermission. Intrinsic value, measured by activation in predefined reward-related regions, declined in the control group but was preserved in both extrinsic reward groups after withdrawal. Thus, both monetary and social rewards were associated with preserved intrinsic value. However, intrinsic behavioral motivation declined in the monetary group but was maintained in the social group. These findings suggest that extrinsic reward withdrawal differentially influences intrinsic value and motivational drive across reward categories, thereby clarifying the variability of the undermining effect.
超越破坏效应:外在奖励保护神经内在奖励。
自我决定理论认为,外在奖励的退缩往往会破坏内在动机。这种破坏效应因奖励类别而异(例如,金钱vs.赞美)。然而,这种差异背后的机制尚不清楚,部分原因是先前的研究将内在动机概念化为单一结构,没有区分喜欢(内在价值)和想要(动机驱动)。如果不能区分这一点,奖励对每个组成部分的影响就会变得模糊。我们假设外在奖励退缩会对内在价值和动机驱动产生不同的影响。为了验证这一假设,我们对54名参与者进行了功能性磁共振成像(fMRI),他们被随机分配到三种情况中的一种:控制(没有奖励)、金钱奖励或社会奖励。金钱奖励组和社会奖励组的参与者玩了两次秒表游戏,第一次有外部奖励,然后没有。对照组在任务过程中没有获得任何外部奖励。我们通过fmri测量奖励系统的激活和任务间歇期间自愿参与的动机驱动来评估内在价值。内在价值,通过预先定义的奖励相关区域的激活来测量,在对照组中下降,但在退出后,两个外在奖励组都保持不变。因此,货币和社会奖励都与保留的内在价值有关。然而,内在行为动机在货币组中有所下降,而在社会组中则保持不变。这些研究结果表明,外在奖励退缩对不同奖励类别的内在价值和动机驱动的影响是不同的,从而阐明了破坏效应的可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书